#LTCtalks 2024 Dialogue 3: Fueling the Future: Advancing Hydrogen Technology & Infrastructure in IE

#LTCtalks 2024 Dialogue 3: Fueling the Future: Advancing Hydrogen Technology & Infrastructure in IE

Show Video

good afternoon everybody it is almost afternoon  I am Kimberly Collins I am the director of the   Leonard Transportation Center it's great to see  you all here we're trying something new going   out and doing destination dialogues we've always  just had them lately at Omnitrans but now we're   thinking of going out on the road and showing  folks looks a lot of the different transportation   realities that exist within the Inland Empire  give people a give of how transportation   is developing and moving forward within our  communities so I think we have a really great   program today we're going to have a welcoming  remarks and then we will have our speakers and   a tour and we're going to look at the hydrogen  facilities and I believe we're going to ride a   hydrogen bus so first I’d like to welcome josh welcome everyone my name is Joshua Landis I’m   the planning manager at Foothill transit  this is our Pomona operating facility we   have two facilities our other facilities  in the cities in Arcadia Urbandale it's   actually split right down the middle Doran unfortunately couldn't be here   today so we have a saying that blessed are  the flexible so I’m filling in I’ve actually   been part of the advisory council since some of  the earlier dialogue series in 2018 so happy to   welcome everybody to our Pomona facility all  of our facilities are contracted out so the   ones here is with Keolis our partner today at the  Pomona facility and then Arcadia is operated by   a company called Transdev so everyone here has a  welcome gift it's one of our double deck buses it   was actually the 1st all electric double deck bus  in North America we have two of those are operated   out of the Arcadia facility and they operate on  our silver streak line which goes from Montclair   to Downtown LA and then hopefully you can stick  around after the presentations for the tour   we do have our hydrogen fuel cell buses that  we'll take a tour on and we have 33 of those   right now and we are in the process of ordering  more as well as more double deck buses so looking   to expand our fleet and so that's so welcome to  Pomona and now I’d like to welcome up a great   supporter of the dialogues and really been a  partner also a mentor HNTB and we have a new   face from HNTB today Basem Muallem please hi good afternoon my name is Basem Muallem   so I am currently with HNTB and before I go into  HNTB and what we do at HNTB so I worked for this   lady right here when I was with ailPros working on  the Redlands passenger rail I worked for Parsons   I worked for WSP currently I’m with HNTB so when  I was asked you are you familiar with the Leonard   Transportation Center and so what you mean am  I familiar I was on the board for a few years   so one of the things that you do as a director of  CalTrans I was the director of CalTrans I ended   up my career as a director of CalTrans is to be  able to network with the community transportation   is very critical and that's where I saw a lot of  value with the Leonard Transportation Center the   looking at the congestion on the i-15 University  Ave Cal State San Bernardino but then looking at   the big picture how can we assist you guys getting  grants what is it that we can do to assist the   center I think it's a great center I’ve been there  are numerous numerous times and so I’m very very   excited to be here a little bit about HNTB we  are a big big firm so this is my fourth start   now as far as in consulting have been concerning  for almost 10 years they do a bit of everything   so they're really really known you know they do  planning airports rail construction management   project management all the biggest projects in  the east and here bridges we're very well known   for that so I’m very excited to be here and I look  forward to completely partnering with you on this   great thank you so much first I’d like to  also thank as we've noted HNTB is a great   sponsor partner and mentor really so they do  more than just sponsor our program but they   really provide a lot of input and assistance  which is greatly appreciated I’d also like to   note our other platinum sponsors the Ontario  International Airport down the street and the   San Bernardino International Airport who have  been great supporters of this program our gold   sponsors our Omnitrans SoCalGas the US National  Science Foundation and Woodruff and Smart our   silver sponsors our EXP Foothill Transit Global  Leadership Alliance LANE Metrolink SCAG the   Southern California Association of Governments  Syrusa Engineering and Theodora Oringher law   firm so it's great to have all of these again  supporters and we appreciate all of them for   their for their belief and their and their work  with us ok from here I’d like to start off we   these are dialogues so our expectation is that  people will engage you don't want to have just   a bunch of talking heads out there and experts  but we want individuals to really be part of   the conversation so just to get us thinking  and starting us off we have a poll that you   can go on if you're online you can click in  and if you're here in the room and so they're   questions they're not scientific they're just to  get folks to start thinking about the issues and   one of the issues is the hydrogen distribution  infrastructure it's fully developed pretty sure   yes no unsure I know what I would answer and we'll  see what folks are out there all right there we   go 100% no I knew that I was I was worried and  I thought we'd like get some unsures but yeah   the hydrogen distribution infrastructure is  just beginning to get developed and there's   a number of projects out there and we'll see  how our region and the Southern California   area works with that oh we have a yes ok so from  there I’d like to welcome our first speaker she   is online she'll be up on our screen and that's  Edith Moreno from SoCalGas and if we could bring   her up she's going to speak about advancing  California ’s clean energy transportation   I am really sorry I’m not was not able to join  you all this morning there was a little bit of   a scheduling conflict but I’m really bummed to be  missing out the tour of the hydrogen buses and so   I you know I’m a huge believer of just kind of the  hydrogen fuel cell technology and its applications   in the heavy duty sector and I actually drive  a Nexo myself which is one of the first like h2   fuel cell SUV but again I’m Edith Moreno I’m happy  to be here with you all and I support kind of on   a high level strategic stakeholder engagement for  the gas company and specifically my efforts have   been focused on the clean field space and more so  and Angeles Link so I’m here to talk to you all   a little bit about what SoCalGas is doing in this  space I know I only have a quick 15 minutes but we   can wait for the Q&A I'll just do a quick overview  on just SoCalGas if folks are not a customer   of ours but you know we've been in the game of  delivering energy to you know millions of Southern   Californians for over 150 years we are actually  the largest natural gas distribution utility in   the country right we cover about 24,000 square  miles of terrain so it's almost half of California   you'll see that kind of little thumbnail icon here  but again I'm just kind of happy to be here today   to just kind of describe, you know SoCalGas's  role in the in the clean energy transition so   next slide please I won't go into the nitty gritty  of each of these bills but I all I will say is,   you know, we live in a state that has very  aggressive climate goals and very aggressive clean   energy targets and it's really great that we live  in a state that takes climate change seriously   and that we are a leader in you know setting  very ambitious goals that will not only reduce   greenhouse gas emissions but would also reduce  criteria air pollutants right but if we can just   go on to the next slide I’ll just go ahead and  jump in here but you know I think what's happening   now is right we've adopted all of these very great  aggressive clean energy targets there's you know a   huge push for decarbonizing our economy but how  we're going to get there or how we're going to   decarbonize our economy will require essentially a  strategy where we have a broad portfolio of energy   sources including clean fuels I think the reality  is that you know battery electric technology is   really great and it works for end use applications  where it works and where it's it kind of makes   sense from a cost effective standpoint but the  reality is that not everything will be able to be   fully electrified and we will still need a clean  fuel specifically to power our economy whether   that's aviation right for complexes the heavy  duty sector the mobility sector heavy industry   and even power generation right you know today  you know we have abundant renewable resources   but at night what is powering and our economy and  keeping the lights on is natural gas and hopefully   in the future sure you know we'll be able to  have clean fuels like hydrogen that have scaled   up and readily deployed to support all of these  sectors and I think you know I’ve been working   in the hydrogen space for about several years  now probably 5 years or so and it was really   great to see that the department of energy right  at the federal level is really taking a look at   paying attention to the role that clean fuels and  specifically hydrogen would play in facilitating   the development of not only decarbonizing  California but decarbonizing the country and so if   folks are not aware of this you know the federal  government is investing about $7 billion in   developing hydrogen hubs and then also there was  some money that was set aside as well for carbon   management solutions so think of carbon capture or  direct air capture techno allergies and California   actually was one of those hubs so we are slated  to receive about $1.2 billion in federal funding   to facilitate the development of hydrogen hubs  in California which I think just speaks volume   to the amount of policy support there is rate and  the amount of momentum and I’m really hoping that   we can continue to ride you know this wave of you  know the support that we have for advancing the   clean fuels technology ok so what is SoCalGas  role in developing this I know some people you   know earlier I’m glad that we had that poll you  know that asked the audience whether we think   that our hydrogen distribution network is fully  developed and unfortunately it's not and I think   that's one of the biggest reasons why hydrogen  today is super expensive largely because it gets   trucked to those filling stations it gets produced  and then gets trucked but you know the most cost   effective way to transport hydrogen is via a  dedicated hydrogen pipeline and so that is what   SoCalGas is actively investing and studying today  and so we have a proposal to build what would be   hopefully the largest cleanable hydrogen pipeline  system that would deliver reliable hydrogen to   you know the LA Basin to power right the ports  to support the heavy duty transportation sector   and it could also and with you know providing  that fuel to power these sectors of the economy   we could hopefully see a significant improvement  in air quality and reduce our GHG emissions from   the hard to electrify sectors in the LA region so  where SoCalGas is with this project as we're about   a year and a half in to what we are calling  phase 1 so it's about 16 feasibility studies   that SoCalGas has executed ranging from number of  things in you know where is it that where is that   hydrogen would be produced who would be the off  takers what's the cost effectiveness of hydrogen   right does it make sense to build out a dedicated  hydrogen delivery infrastructure system or is it   more cost effective to potentially pursue other  technologies like maybe full electrification and   so I mentioned we're about a year and a half and  into the process since the commission authorized   SoCalGas to proceed with this work so we're  expecting to complete this first phase of   Angela’s link and all of these feasibility studies  will be available to the public by the end of the   year so it's a really exciting time for the gas  company and it's really great that you know we   have received authorization from the commission  to proceed with this work which again just speaks   volumes to just the support that we have in  California to figure out what whether we'll be   able to make the facilitation of the development  of a hydrogen economy in California work so next   slide so I talked about you know I guess I started  with the future with Angeles Link but I wanted to   highlight quickly what SoCalGas is actively  doing today in terms of a tangible project   with hydrogen so we have built what we're calling  the hydrogen innovation experience at our energy   resource center in Downey if folks have not had  the opportunity to visit our hydrogen home and our   hydrogen micro grid please feel free to reach out  to me and we can facilitate a tour of our hydrogen   home but essentially what it is it's a showcase of  how both the gas as in hydrogen and the electric   and the renewables just kind of all come together  to work and power essentially it's a small scale   microgrid demonstration project that we have  connected to so we have solar panels on site that   power the electrolyzer that electrolyzer produces  hydrogen on site it is stored the hydrogen is used   to power the fuel cell it's also used to blend so  we take a certain I think anywhere actually it's   20% blend of hydrogen that is blended into  the natural gas distribution system that is   connected to the home and that powers the powers  essentially all of the natural gas appliances with   no modifications today and so again it's just  off the shelf technology and it's really great   to see that you know we're able to demonstrate  this to the to the public right because I think   there's a lot of certainty with just hydrogen  you know what is it but I think a lot of folks   don't realize is that you know hydrogen is widely  used today there's about 1600 miles of dedicated   hydrogen pipeline right I think today it's largely  used in petrochemical applications and even some   steel and other heavy duty industrial applications  like the production of ammonia yeah but I think   having folks visit the hydrogen innovation  experience just really helps folks understand   what even an electrolyzer is and you'll see it  all come together to power this home and we have   a really great setup inside the home that is very  interactive and very educational so this so I know   I just mentioned the home and that's very much  just a test demonstration kind of pilot that we've   set up but right now we're in the process of  hopefully bringing this hydrogen blending project   into the real world environment and so at the  direction of the commission we were required to   join our other utilities including pacific gas and  electric San Diego gas and electric and southwest   gas to propose demonstration pilot projects  to collect the real world data that we need   to blend you know to develop a hydrogen blending  injection standard I think a lot of research today   shows that you know it's we're pretty safe to  blend hydrogen at low levels but as a prudent   operator of the gas system right we want to make  sure that we collect actual data and so what we   proposed with the commission are two projects  one with the city of orange cove which is kind   of located in the northernmost part of our service  territory and so we have an isolated system there   that we've identified and then we also have a  project at UC Irvine that will be serve their   recreation center and UC Irvine is actually a  really great leader in the hydrogen space and   so we're excited to partner with them and collect  additional data and work with alongside them to   hopefully to you know get the data that we need to  eventually inform the development of an injection   stand so again this is just an application that we  submitted to the commission just earlier this year   we're hopefully expecting to have approval from  the commission by early next year and hopefully   we can hit the ground running on these projects  and do live demonstrations to eventually inform   the development of an injection standard and  last thing I want to note is right why we need   an injection standard today is right we want to  be able you know we want to be able to have a   place where we can put the hydrogen that is being  produced in our state like again it's currently   only trucked in California to the hydrogen end  users specifically the hydrogen fueling stations   and as over time right we'll be able to build  out hydrogen dedicated hydrogen infrastructure   but in the meantime right hopefully we'll be  able to inject the hydrogen that is produced   into the system the existing system today so we  have a place you know to put it in and continue   to support that scale up of hydrogen like I  mentioned we've been in the energy delivery   space for over 150 years and you know SoCalGas  does have a really great workforce to leverage   right our bread and butter is pipelines today  and so the only difference of what would change   and how we operate is instead of delivering  natural gas today hopefully we'll be delivering   hydrogen to our customers in in the future so that's it ok thank you Edith that was great we can   take some questions if you have anybody has any  questions right now for Edith we have one question   from the audience very interesting project in your  overview of the project component is separating   the hydrogen and the gas there during the reverse  as blending I’m just curious what that component   is for so was the question is blending the project  injecting the hutch into the pipeline that's a   blend and then downstream eventually pulling the  hydrogen from the from the natural gas was that   the question yes so in your overview zero is one  component that you are doing the separation of   the blended gas back to the hydrogen gas I’m just  kind of curious what that component is for and why   you have that part oh yeah I’m sorry if I  might have misspoke of her it wasn't clear   but right now there's no proposal as part of our  hydrogen blending projects we are not planning   to separate the hydrogen I think what I was  trying to say is you know blending is a way   to not only lower the kind of carbon footprint  of the fuel that so how gas delivers today but   it's also a place where hydrogen producers can  put the hydrogen and while we work on dedicated   hydrogen infrastructure I know there are some  end users who might look at hydrogen separation   technologies right if they only want pure hydrogen  that is if they are not near the infrastructure   or not near a production area but I just want  to clarify and again I apologize if I misspoke   but we're not proposing hydrogen separation as  part of that pilot project so then I think the   question would be if it's in residential are  natural gas or appliances going to be able   to run with the hydrogen mix yes so yes and so  right now it's shown so we actually have been   testing at our own laboratories in it's called  an engineering analysis center or engineering   center and that's in Pico and so we've been able  to demonstrate there that our appliances work   up to with 30% blend but the one that we have in  Downey is operating at 20% so the tankless water   heater that if we installed on in the home is what  you would get at home depot or any other hardware   store where you where you would buy your appliance  and so that's working with no modification same   thing with the stove on site same thing with  the I think we have an outdoor fireplace and an   outdoor gas BBQ as well so no modifications to the  equipment would be required with up to 20% blend   all right that's great then we're going to get  on to our next poll question so we can bring up   our next speaker our next question hydrogen  is as safe as any other transportation fuel   energy source yes no unsure this is a question  of you need people ask how safe is hydrogen and   hopefully everyone has the vision that it's going  to be driving down the road and your car is going   to blow up that's what we know that's not true  and our next speaker has the expertise to tell   us all about that ok all right few unsure but  most people think it's just as safe as everyone   else which is good with that I’d like to bring  up our next speaker who's actually in the room   thank you so much I’m really happy to be here  today so yeah my name is Alejandra Hormaza and   I am working as an assistant professor at  Cal Poly Pomona so I’d like to start off by   talking about hydrogen leakage my past work and  my future work and to address the poll question   earlier because I feel like I get that question  a lot is hydrogen actually safe and I understand   like the uncertainty that some people might  have because it's unfamiliar and it has sort   of there's been myths about it that have been  proliferated throughout society but I like to   remind people that we are constantly surrounded  by fuel infrastructure that we cannot see it's   usually in our homes we also use devices like  our phones that have explosive parts and we   don't really think of them as being dangerous the  advantage about like there was the incident with   Samsung in like 2016 and like you couldn't even  take it to the airport and the other concern or   the other advantage about hydrogen too is that  because it's so much lighter than air if there   is a leak it's going to disperse much more quickly  than like a liquid fuel at the gas station where   it can pool and because it pools that poses a high  risk of combustion so I would my opinion is that   hydrogen can be safe with the right measures ok so  but a big concern is leaks right because hydrogen   it's very small and so there are concerns about  it leaking from our natural gas system so this was   the bulk of my masters work in like 2017 and we  really wanted to understand how existing natural   gas infrastructure would perform when full of  hydrogen so what are some of the potential blends   right so as you can see here we have all of this  infrastructure we were really focusing on after   the meter infrastructure so low pressure what you  might find in a residential setting or a business   with gas powered appliances with a lot of joints  and fittings and so in the literature and NREL   the gas technology institute everyone agrees  that hydrogen has these properties that suggest   it should leak much faster but this is based upon  the assumption that we're looking at flows through   typical channels right if we have just a very  large pipe here if we're flowing hydrogen should   flow much faster than methane because it's so much  more like it has qualities that make it much more   mobile and if we look at these different flow  regimes and different ways of modeling different   types of flows it should leak anywhere from like  1.3 to three times faster but until we actually   test this we don't really know if this is true  because what I often tell students in that class   especially in I think in any kind of setting  a lot of the way we use physics and science to   understand the world it's just the model of real  systems so we have to make really significant   simplifications to be able to come up with  reasonable analysis and sometimes the assumptions   that we make they don't apply which means our  models are invalid and so we wanted to understand   this experimentally to really see if this is  true this was over at UC Irvine so we separated   a section of the natural gas system as you can see  here highlighted in yellow with various different   properties this had been used previously for  combustion types of experiments where they   in fact we're looking at natural gas hydrogen  blends and so the literature does suggests that   up to about 20 I’ve seen like 10% to 20% you  can use existing natural gas appliances with   hydrogen mixtures so also note here that natural  gas combustion sensors at this time did not detect   any amount of gaseous fuel leakage ok so these  were the results so you can see along the y axis   it's the pressure and then along the x axis it's  the time and we tested natural gas we tested a   blend of 10% hydrogen 90% natural gas by volume  and then only hydrogen and you can see that well   first of all our system was leaking right because  if our system wasn't leaking the natural gas   system the natural gas pressure should have been  the same over the course of the week so one this   is indicative ok the system is leaking we don't  detect it the old factory sense like we don't   smell the sulfur in the gas but also our systems  aren't detecting this so this slide ok likely in   the discrepancy between the methane budget between  what's it like in the atmosphere versus how much   we measure there there's probably a lot of these  small leaks that are happening and methane is a   very powerful greenhouse gas so that's kind of a  bad sign and then second they even both the full   hydrogen bond and the 10% hydrogen they show the  same initial and final obviously the same initial   but the same final pressure the rate of leakage  is the same for the three blends and we tested   this over and over with various different types  of equipment because this didn't line up with   what was in the literature and then when we looked  more closely at where the leaks were happening we   realized that they were happening at the joints  right so at the elbows at the T connection that   there were any caps or any kinds of like valves it  was happening in those areas so then we actually   spoke with some people from SoCalGas that were  running experiments on 5% hydrogen blends and   they also found very similar behavior where the  5% blend was showing the same rate of leakage   as just the pure natural gas blend which I think  I need to update some of these labels yeah so we   went back into the literature and we found that  there was a same online paper by these I think   they're related these two brothers Swain and Swain  that was published in 1992 so a long long time ago   and they used fittings that were given to them by  a gas company because those fittings were faulty   and so they were just kind of like donated to do  some of these assessments on how different blends   of hydrogen methane and propane would leak and  their findings surprisingly suggested very similar   findings to our own so this is one leak a second  leak 3 and then four so you can see that methane   hydrogen and propane they all show the same  behavior if you look at the pressure versus the   flow rate so for the same pressure the flow rate  is the same but classical thermodynamics not the   classical fluid mechanics suggests that should not  be the case we should see something more like this   where there's a deviation and they attribute this  to entrance effects so they say it's happening   because the flow is not fully developed and  therefore the assumptions break down and so we   wanted to test this ourselves to see if actually  lowering that entrance length would impact to the   floor rate but if anything we found that it  actually makes it worse if we make the length   of the tube very very small the difference in  leakage is significant and even greater than what   these models would suggest so it was definitely  not these entrance affects yeah so we went back   to look at ok what is actually happening we know  that the leaks are happening in these areas where   the joints are so what about these joints and  these faulty fittings makes it so that we can't   approximate the flow as though it's a perfect  channel and we started to realize ok classical   fluid mechanics assumes that the flow is steady  that it would fall under these flow regimes that   are pretty ideal like laminar flow that we can  ignore density fluctuations that we can ignore   any changes in viscosity and also we can ignore  the behavior of the molecules at the wall boundary   well when you look at this more closely if you  think about a leak a leak is happening at the   boundary of the wall it's not like the molecules  there's some kind of interaction between the free   molecules that are flowing and the edges of  that pipe right so that's an assumption that   becomes quite significant and if one of the key  assumptions too in these macroscopic big flows   is that you ignore that the flow is made-up of  actual small particles but really when a leak   happens it's not that your entire gas leaks all  at once right you have like tiny molecules that   find their way and they separate from the bulk gas  and enter that wall that little crack in the wall   right so suddenly the molecular nature becomes  very important yeah so we were able to taking   those ideas especially about the importance of  the molecular nature and this deviation from these   perfect conditions at equilibrium we were able to  replicate these findings or these results so you   can see pressure versus flow rate for natural gas  and hydrogen using a capillary tube the capillary   tube is actually something that's typically used  in gas chromatography to measure concentrations   of various different types of gases but the  reason for why it was a successful replication   is because it closely resembles the tortuously  path that occurs in a leak with significant   wall interactions between the molecules escaping  and flowing through that crack so the leaks that   suggests that the leaks can't be represented as a  smooth channel where we have flow through a pipe   rather we have to account for the deviation from  equilibrium and the significant interactions with   the wall boundaries and so we proposed the two  step mechanism so the first step is that you have   molecules really moving around right like the air  in this room it's just kind of moving and bouncing   everywhere so first of all these molecules have  to enter the leak crack and so that's step one   and so it might be hydrogen is like still more  mobile right so it could be hydrogen is entering   and leaving but it's entering and and leaving at a  much faster rate but the net effect is still going   to be the same ok and then once the molecules  enter then they enter the very torturous path   right and these connections they mated connections  they're not perfect right sometimes there's edges   like roughness in the edges which is what causes  this thing to happen in the 1st place and there   isn't always perfect alignment so you have a path  that has a lot of changes in the diameter and that   means that you have differences in density that  suddenly become important and also differences   you suddenly the molecular interactions with the  wall boundaries become very significant and that   instead of the particle like the that for this  step 2 it's that the pressure is what's driving   the leak rate and so that is why this is our  hypothesis for why methane and hydrogen leak   at the same rate under these kinds of conditions  and so these were some of the conclusions so that   hydrogen and methane may leak at the same rate  from low pressure natural gas infrastructure   hydrogen doesn't preferentially leak so it's  not that the hydrogen if we have a blend the   hydrogen will not if we have a blend that's mixed  the hydrogen won't leak faster than the methane   typical leaks cannot be modeled in macroscopic  continuous flows we propose a 2 step mechanism   and then finally odorants and natural gas  they're not sufficient to detect small leaks   and not that these leaks I think really pose  a danger to us in terms of like a potential   ignition but more that there's a lot of like  gas that we might just be leaking without even   noticing and not really accounting for and  so there's a paper that I published on this   at Cal Poly Pomona I’m planning to continue with  this work by assessing the leakage rate of various   different types of materials right because we only  looked at low pressure infrastructure but there's   the distribution and also the transmission system  and there's plastic pipes that are used mainly for   hydrogen more work on examining the fundamentals  like mechanisms of leakage as well as looking   at because there's this idea that we can use  underground storage for storing hydrogen but   how can we better understand that and what could  be the potential leakage that could happen and the   other reason for why this is really important is  because there's a lot of concern on hydrogen can   be kind of a controversial fuel right now and in  the atmospheric science community there's a big   concern about the short term climate impacts of  hydrogen but because we don't have quantitative   evidence that actually understand how much  hydrogen could potentially leak from the   system these models are only as accurate as the  assumptions that they are based on and without   having assumptions that are based on actual  science it really makes these models I don't   think as strong as they could be right so I think  there's really an opportunity to reconcile some   of these tensions around hydrogen and I think  also we can leverage these findings to address   some of the mixed exceptions surrounding hydrogen  that exists today and with that I’m happy to take   any questions thank you yeah that's just in case  people have questions yeah thanks you know just   curious when you say there is this leakage so is  it just when you go through a different topography   different alignment going straight versus then you  have a bend in the areas like with that leakage is   that consistent with just the hydrogen about the  blended and how about the methane if you put that   methane for example and you have a change like  an angle 50% leak or it just only happens mostly   when you put in so far from what we've seen  only when you put hydrogen or even blended   so yeah they're all three gases they're all  leaking from the same fittings all of them   so they all show that they're leaking the same  there's no difference in their behavior between   the hydrogen the blend and the natural gas so they are leaking at the same rate yes at   the same rate from the same places yes are you saying that you're going to be   doing some additional studies on different  materials for either treatment or transmitted   hydrogen are you familiar with any new materials  right now that are maybe stronger than what they   use right now for the for example the class  8 trucks they have this you know really huge   and heavy containers so that they can maintain  the pressure necessary to yes economically be   able to transfer and utilize the hydrogen cells yeah that's a good question so I’m not familiar   with storage materials right because in a  truck that's more storage I’m more familiar   with materials used in pipes and I know that  for hydrogen typically plastic pipes are what   are preferred in industry yeah transmission yes can we just see by looking at vibration in   the pipe and found that leakage no but that's  a great test to look that's a great idea so   the question was there a leakage between when  you're filling the dispenser yeah I don't know   the mechanism so I can't answer that frequently  do you have a question so ok my question is so how   much can the program reduce the effectiveness of  the buses that we're going to be looking at like   what kind of strategies can we or is it already  implemented in the bus that we're going to look at   or established because I can reduce like how much  how effective it is so the hydrogen is just like   any other fuel source it goes into and so it's  probably similar you know they have they have   a special nozzle right so that we can look at  it so that you don't have the release but you   there's release when you go to the gas station  right there's releases from the nozzle so you   know you'd have to see what the what the nozzle  what the protections are within the nozzle and   then it goes generally into a fuel cell right so  it's powered differently the questions is your   question about like the problem of leakage and  how this could impact the deployment of hydrogen   is that ok yeah so yeah so that's a really good  question right from an economic ok so hydrogen   today is really really expensive and the Biden  Harris administration they've set this hydrogen   earth shot the last time they had an earth shot  was to get to the moon in like I forget exactly   the numbers for the moon but for hydrogen it's to  bring it down to $1 per kilogram in like 1 decade   and I’m forgetting what the third one is 111 I’m  blanking but so today hydrogen is significantly   more expensive than methane and then any fossil  fuels and part of that is because the equipment   that we have to make hydrogen renewably which  are called electrolyzers and they just split   water into hydrogen oxygen that is still it's  at a high technology readiness level but it's   not it's just expensive today and it's barely  entering the market there is funding going   into this through in the inflation reduction  act to bring it down but so to answer your   question from an economic perspective leaking  hydrogen is not very good for these developers   especially today where hydrogen is so expensive  right and in the future it still won't be I think   even like 10% might be quite significant right  because every time that there's hydrogen being   leaked it's money being wasted because it costs  money to make that hydrogen right so like from   my financial standpoint it's not very good  and then also from an efficiency standpoint   because if you're using the fuel in your car  obviously if you're leaking some of it you're   going to get less range the question is yeah if  there's a cost to the blend or if it's the same   price coming across to the t consumer because the  hydrogen is hydrogen is more expensive than the   natural gas so what is the is the cost changing yes that's a really good question so what we have   in Downey is just a SoCalGas facility right so  right now there's no cost to anyone aside from   just SoCalGas of operating that and the what if  we ultimately get approved for the pilot project   and if ultimately we develop a hydrogen blending  injection standard that the state needs to adopt   the pricing we'd still have to determine that  because it's going to be very much dependent   on how much hydrogen production we have online  and how many customers are going to be receiving   the blend if that makes sense I’m sorry I can't  give you any specifics but today right we're just   pulling natural gas from SoCal gases system  we're producing that hydrogen on site and so   the costs there are essentially what the water  cost that we get from the city of Downey right   and then just kind of SoCal gases operation and  maintenance cost for that setup but ultimately   in a future where hopefully we'll be delivering  hydrogen blended fuels to our customers there's   still a lot of uncertainty on what that rate  impact would be but that that's a really good   question it'll be still several years out until  right we get information from the pilot program   we then go back to the state of California or  the public utilities commission specifically   with our proposal of a statewide hydrogen blending  injection standard and then in that process which   I would say my just best estimate is maybe in five  years or so and that in that time frame we would   be going through the tariff changes and the rate  changes associated with the hydrogen blend into   the system I hope that answers the question yeah  and I guess what is the price differential right   now between hydrogen and natural gas oh my gosh  it is $36 a kilogram today at the pump and then   the natural gases is 36 yeah so 36 of hydrogen a  kilogram and I have not checked our rates but we   bill by the term and I’d have to get back to you  so Tod Warden says it is about $2 depends on the   yard riverside cities about 25 most natural gas  stations are about $2 a gallon oh you're talking   about natural gas fueling stations not what goes  with the customers yeah so it's 36 and then the   CNG stations it depends SoCalGas owns and operates  so natural gas or CNG fueling stations and that's   a lot but it depends on where you are all right so  right over at $36 versus like $2 correct ok great   so we'll talk about that we're going to close out  this portion of the dialogue thanks so much to   both of our speakers I’d like to just give another  round of applause and now for those of us who are   on site we're going to go get on the hydrogen bus  and we're going to go around the yard a bit and   see the facilities here to understand Foothill  Transit is one of the few there's the Downey of   course but that's LA County and this is almost San  Bernardino county but it's foothill transits one   of the few the few hydrogen facilities within our  region so it's going to be a good chance to see   it and there's some clean transportation  pioneers of clean transportation Doran Barnes   unfortunately who was not able to be here has  really been at the forefront of transportation   we have a survey for you if you can online answer  the survey yeah this is our first kind of going   out and taking the dialogues on the road so  we'd like to get feedback from you about that   as we move forward and thank you all for those  of you online for coming and for those of you who   are here go outside and do our tour thank you so  much enjoy the tour everyone thank you thank you

2024-07-18 22:13

Show Video

Other news