Episode 637: Who Are 'They' And Can 'They' Win? w/ Richard Grove and Tom Luongo
![Episode 637: Who Are 'They' And Can 'They' Win? w/ Richard Grove and Tom Luongo Episode 637: Who Are 'They' And Can 'They' Win? w/ Richard Grove and Tom Luongo](/pic/episode_637_who_are_they_and_can_they_win_w-_richard_grove_and_tom_luongo/ajI2NmVaaGZWU0E_.jpeg)
tom richard how are you guys doing today breathing in and out repeating my nature i'm doing wonderfully well pete no how you doing doing very well doing very well i wanted to have you guys on because i've had each of you on recently and somebody in my patreon is just like i think those two guys should get on an episode together and talk and i'm like well what about and they're like i don't know maybe about like who is they because when we talk a lot of us when we start generalizing and we start saying all this is happening know all this is being taken from us all who's in charge oh it's they and i think that richard has a long history of coming on this show and talking about who they are and tom i've recorded one episode with you and we did you're really really up on the world economic forum so i thought that you guys would be it would have a really interesting conversation talking about the days and so i invite tom to kick it off let me know what you know about the world economic forum and we can compare notes well so i mean from my perspective it i you know i i like to call them the davos crowd i don't even like to talk about just specifically the the world economic forum and i think you know if you look in the if you look in the the across got what i like to call you know political crime space today i think the davos term has really begun to become it's it's kind of a lift off or a critical mass and i've been beating this drum for four years like it's all coming out of these people who get together every year davos and think well we run the world and this is the way we want to shape the world the problem with davos is that it's a very loose coalition of people who come in and come out and they're all a bunch of different factions that the way i see it but they all have a particular they all have similar but competing it's somewhat slightly competing agendas at various moments in time because i look at this whole thing as a very big kind of the best way to describe i think what's happening today is it's a multiplayer game of go right it's not a two-player game of go where you've got black stones and white stones you've got redstones you've got purple stones you've got green stones you've got red zone stones and they're all vying for area control while at the same time saying we all want to be in charge right and at times people different people are right onto the table to do different things and as long as we suppress the people themselves we suppress freedom individuality and anything else because at the end of the day they're all just variations on commies you've got chinese companies you've got european commies you've got american commies you've got they're all just commies i mean when it really comes down to it uh just of different flavors and some of them are you know neo-liberal commies and some of them are neoconservative commies but they're all just i mean from a libertarian perspective they're all just very rejectious about it they're all commies so that's the way i see davos i see you know you've got the obama wing of the democratic party working with davos but not necessarily and for a long time you got the clinton wing but you don't necessarily have other parts of the democratic party working this way i certainly say it at the at the lieutenant level you've got the wall street banks can be seduced into davos for a while but the minute you know davos says hey you know we really want to throw you guys to the oda the uh occupy wall street as chum because we really want to introduce central bank digital currencies and we don't need you anymore then wall street gets off the bus which is kind of where we are right now the federal reserve sometimes they're on the bus sometimes they're off the bus it all depends everybody was united around getting rid of trump because trump and brexit were the two things stopping the big agenda right which was to move the ball forward the to keep the the this group this various loose group of oligarchs in power well beyond their use by date which was ending in it's you know and they know it was ending in this timeframe where the global monetary system um is ending and they know it's ending and they need to replace it with something else and the only and they don't know what else to do other than destroy it and rebuild it and so everybody got on board because everybody's power was spread and now that we're two years into this project or almost two years into this project factions are starting to splinter and it's becoming very very difficult to see what's what's happening and so they is now a group is now a they themselves there's a bunch of days running around as opposed to just one day which was for about six to eight months absolutely one project and that was from the me the beginning of covid until right after the election here in the us so that's and again and it's a very complicated way of describing it and i want to make sure that i've got the nuances correct here but that's the way i see it and that's this is constantly shifting which makes it even more impossible to figure out what's going on because you really do have to look at this as you know a game of like multiplayer game of go or you know an eight-player game of diplomacy if you guys are you know board game freaks like that's what you have to look at because the people who are in charge the people who are not in charge but who are winning at any moment in time is constantly shifting because alliances are constantly being made and reformed richard shirt is already champing at the bit so um no i'm not chomping at the bit um so uh my understanding of go is it's an asian game as opposed to uh checkers and chess where it's one move at a time the objective of go is to accumulate much territory take it over as fast as possible it's an area control game but it's an area of control game of soft power meaning you place a stone on the table then i place a stone on the table we go back and forth and but imagine that game and then you can get involved in knife fights at a particular location or you can project soft power by placing indirectly around the board to claim areas in terms of saw power the way geopolitics normally works is it's always a game of move counter move in that in that uh in in that's in that space as when it was a unipolar world and there were two sides it was it was that we don't have a unipolar world where we have at least four or five different factions running around the russians are now coming out of the board the chinese are definitely one europe is definitely one the united states and the uk are definitely ones and so you now have to think of it in those terms because to model it as chess or checkers or any other two-player game is dumb the the in modern parliament the other better way to look at is that it's the final table at the world series of poker everybody has a different stack size stack of chips and it's that kind of game where you can push chips into the pot to bully the pot and you can play the game that way and you got eight people at the table all trying to fight to be the one guy though the end state of that i don't think is i don't think works i think go is it going to be a wind up being a better end state where there's going to be one clear winner but there's going to be other people still at the table when it's with chips on the table where pieces on the table when the game is done the next clarification definition i wanted is all these areas where you uh refer to them as commies i would call those uh collectivists like communism is a subsection of collectivism like i just i i i don't i just yeah i gotta make sure that yeah as i was interpreting we're we agree with that right but i just i've just gotten to the point richard i'm very reductionist about this yeah because i i i want to disabuse everybody of the notion that there are good commies and bad comments that they're good collectivists and bad collectivists they just all suck and that's the problem and the best thing to do is to now just be reductionist and dismissive and just go no you're not even i'm a communist or i'm a social democrat or i'm i'm at this or i know i really it's not that's not socialism it's democratic socialism no it's not it's just freaking communism yeah i get opening yourselves freedom and slavery and and going from that i need to make sure i have clear terms with people when i talk to them because they might think well you know communism is not slavery like this flavor's not slavery it takes your personal property this other way you know um the people right now that are in control they know that the the the economic way of life that we have enjoyed uh while we've been taxed and debted up to the gills uh it's going away that's why they're running up you know they're just printing money and they're just like they printed 40 of the money ever printed since the start of the united states in the last year during cova these sort of things so when there's when it's detached from the gold and they can just print it and they're unaccountable these people they're really brilliant because a a smart thief will figure out how to steal what you have right these people figured out how to steal stuff we don't even have yet they're stealing from our children our grandchildren they're stealing from the future right now they're bringing up a debt that no one none of us who have to pay for it we didn't have anything to do with running up that debt it's not ours it's theirs that's why they're gonna just change over to a system where they can just wipe away all those debts and the united states dollars you know go the way of the confederate dollar well ultimately right now the entire monetary system is built on debt right so they issue debt in order to issue currency we don't really have any money we have currency that runs around and and approximates money um those debts are unpayable they've written and all they're using that money for used through the cantillian effect of they get access to the money first get to spend it at yesterday's prices we have to then and then they lend it to us at tomorrow's prices paying a far higher rate on the money in order to in order to get access to it i.e they they borrow from the fed at a quarter point well we got a mortgage of four per at four points or a car owned at two and a half points or whatever and so while they've compressed those numbers down in order to keep us on the hamster wheel um the truth of the matter is is that you know real physical capital only compounds at about one percent to one and a half percent a year anyway so anything over one anything that they're that they're still they're stealing all your profit anyway they've already stolen the profit now they're stealing your kids profit as you pointed out or even our grandkids profit we're we're so far in the debtor's prison and they know that that now they have to unmore the monetary system again from even debt and just go strictly straight to script right where all they do and that's what monitor that's what modern monetary theory is right yeah so we're we're on the same page there so let's go into uh davos group right sure so i got some books here i got the klaus schwab book here let me just do this for the audience you got klaus schwab oh kovac 19 grace great reset but before that he had the shaping of the fourth industrial revolution and before that he had the fourth industrial revolution let me just show you like because this is klaus schwab in the 21st century and then i'll go into these older books but real quick in his appendix i like to point this out i might have pointed out on pete's show but in case you don't know about this in case you didn't read the appendix it's not called deep [ __ ] it's called deep shift okay and they talk about implantable technologies klaus klaus does in here right so they've been working on this uh for about 40 years to get people implanted make them part of the internet of people all these sort of things so let's go back to the world economic forum a partner in shaping history the first 40 years right and if you go back to the davos manifesto which should be right here so 70 71 was the first year and then they get their group together and then they do this manifesto it must be right here in the red tabbed page rich davos manifestos let's zoom in for a second here his royal highness prince bernard netherlands well he was a ss officer during world war ii doesn't make him a bad guy though he might have been a eugenicist also doesn't make him a bad guy i'm just saying he was one of the guys at the davos manifesto the next one is aurelio piche who was uh group the club of rome wrote limits to growth this is a book which calls humanity the problem and and then they tie that to economic growth right and then they're coupling in some malthus and their philosophy so this is what they're doing today they're taking malthusian economics and evolutionary eugenics putting it all together and saying they can they are a ruling class and they can reshape the world in their image and i think it's the antithesis of american freedom klaus he doesn't uh he doesn't believe in american values though he's very much a collectivist he speaks like a bond villain i mean these are not good characteristics for somebody leading this great reset and he's got pictures in this other one building an international institution of public private cooperation klaus schwab for the world economic forum him and every world leader him and xi jinping him and the pope him and lynn trial there's like the the pictures in the coterie and the cabal around him that's the outer group like the world economic forum davos those are the outer groups they don't know what the people in the inner groups are looking for or doing but klaus was also part of bilderberg and bilderberg is a more secretive less public kind of meeting that's gone on since 1954 and these types of working groups do shape the policies that these outer ring kind of ngo type of corporations and organizations including the united nations okay so are you familiar with the history yeah yeah okay okay i i i i the thing is richard's like and i wanna i wanna i wanna point a couple of things out um i've been through all this um and i look at the scenario as it exists right now um in the libertarian circles i've been down this road for years talking about the evil roth trials and this one that one i have and i honestly have to define i don't think they're evil but their their role in my history is definitely unsubstantial like not substantially meaningful documented in a way that it's known and they're following me but my point being is that you know the there's always the talk about you know what what do iran iraq and you know libya have and you know have in common but they don't have a rothschild run central bank for example that that that ideas propagates through libertarian crime space all the time i i fall over the course of time i've just fallen to the um uh to the into the same uh position as uh martin armstrong on this which is to say look he's like yeah at one point the rock tiles were really important today it's goldman sachs like there's the devil you know that's right in front of you and then there's the devil that may be two or three layers removed from that but at the end of the day those people are the actual ones in power that the gary gensler's and whatnot they're in power and they're they're shaping policy and look i just think that at a certain point everybody starts getting off the bus at some point all right in 2013 lynn roth child uh christine lagarde from imf they started the inclusive capitalism movement which to this day has power over like two-thirds of the world's investable wealth has the pope on board in their messaging yeah how is that that they lost power and gold i haven't i haven't said that that's not what i'm saying what i'm saying is i'm not saying that i thought i know well i know where exactly where christine lagarde is she's into the head of the sea she's the head of the ecb she was placed there by klaus roberts it was before that she was placed in in terms of in front of the imf what i'm saying is that it's important to know this to know these things understand that the stuff started with the club of rome back in the back in the mid 18th cen uh the mid 19th century and whatnot i'm not arguing it against any of that what i'm saying is that um when you get to the crisis point everybody can have all their pieces on the board and you get to your crisis point and then we're going to move the ball into this direction and they've told us what their plan is and everything else doesn't necessarily mean that one is going to work right two that everybody that they've drafted is gonna stay on board because eventually the compromat like everything else is a time value of money like everything in this world has an options you know has a theta or you know an options theory has a time quotient according to it so well you can get people on board to do specific things because you've got you've got compromat on them or they're they were drafted into your organization or whatever when the push comes to shove and it's their ass on the line oh then it may it may not work out so well they may not actually do what they're what they were drafted to do or even capable of doing what they were that was true up until the pandemic but now that people's internal dna software is controlled by an external force that might also be one in the same that we're talking about as the day they have to make different decisions because they won't continue to get the boosters to keep them alive it's immunity on subscription for some people i'm part of the control group i'm not part of the experimental group so i wish them all well but i think that the government has no place in my body i agree i'm not i'm part of the control group as well we'll see um you know look we all know what these people were trying to do at a metaphoric level they've rejected god and they're trying to approach god through technology i'm not necessarily a particular trying to be god i know they're trying to be god because they just because they don't believe in god so they're of course trying to approach that state by be and they just want to live forever and they're not going to live forever they're going to die and they're not going to man they're not going to turn they're not going to you know they're not going to suck all of our life energy away from us in order to stay alive in perpetuity it's not going to work we are we should all be individualists enough to know that all attempts at collectivism of this magnitude have always failed because they always because they have to fail otherwise we would not be libertarians otherwise we would not be austrian economists because we would not actually believe that people that individuals pursuing their bliss are actually stronger than the the forces trying to concentrate that so like it's it's it's all fun and good it's all i just i i watch all of this playing out and i'm like well that's cute but you guys are still gonna lose like it doesn't matter you can't hurt between seven and a half billion cats no matter how much you try because the pressure you put on a system the way they're putting on the system now is creating the very opposition to that system which will ultimately cause it to fail because now we're talking cybernetics you're right you're right keep going talk about their intentional their fear is actually going to create their fall absolutely that's absolutely that's that's that's just normal that's that's just that's just that's just evolutionary biology like that's what happens when you put a system under stress right so the biggest problem the biggest problem we're looking at with that and we know this is true uh we know everything you're talking about is true is that dying animals are really dangerous and they're going to seek to take out as many as many of us as possible so that's when we have to become solutionaries i i agree like that's why i look at things like i just look at like they're they cannot pull this off without changing the world monetary system but we already have we already have a private monetary system operating 24 7 365 all around the world today acquiring bill hundreds of billions of dollars in capital every month that they don't that they don't know how to control unless they have the back doors to all the encryption codes that the encryption algorithms that have ever been created which is crypto like if they have shot 256 then they don't have this one they don't have that one it doesn't matter at the end of the day the the technological genie is already out of the bag they've already lost the war as a matter of fact two weeks ago the head of the bank of international settlements innovative innovation forum the president of that wing of the of the bis was at a meeting and gave a speech and said look central banks if you're going to implement digital currencies you better get started because you're five years behind crypto and five years from now private crypto is going to eat your lunch so you don't have five years to institute the digital euro the digital dollar or anything else you've got 18 months it was an admission by the member of the bis himself saying you don't have it you've already failed i agree i downloaded the bis white paper on their international central bank cryptocurrency and i was like they're too far they're too far behind the curve of course and humanity and freedom can win because nerds nerds yes hey pete you had two white pill guys on your show that's what i'm figuring out i'm an optimist tom's an optimist we've been around for a while we could know enough to be black pilled by now but we see i've already gone through my blindfold i've already gone through my blackfield phase all right good and and the other thing is and that was about 2004 by the way um for about 18 months you know there's that is the old joke in libertarianism what's the difference between miraculous and anarchist about two years yeah about two years two years yeah about two years so it's during that it's like after that two years it's that the next 18 months is when you go through the whole black pill thing where they're going to win and then you come out the other side if you're if you ever get out of that stage where you go yeah but they're not all really closeted austrians manipulating the business cycle to their own ends they really are just keynesians and malthusians look at china look at china right now anyone who's following china right now and following evergrand right everybody's like oh it's lehman brothers no it's probably worse than lehman brothers for them and it's good it's beautiful to watch because it is it took them 25 years what it took us to 108 to do they just it is i agree but tactically the way i'm reading evergrand i believe this is actually part of g strategy i i believe that g is actually purposefully allowing evergrand to fail because he wants to nationalize the property market a great swat to the property market in china and this is a great way to knock down some tall poppies within that system also to put a lot of financial pressure on blackrock soros and all the rest of the rentier class the way they finally come to the under the those marxists to finally realize that the biggest problem that they face from the west is not nuclear weapons it's the rentier class of all financial oligarchs who use who use the cantillian effect of cheap physical money cheap fiat money to buy up physical labor and then cut overseas and then charge and then earn rent against it and they're now they're on a now g is on a mission same with putin over in russia they're on a mission to end that system within their countries and they're putting up walls around their capital it's why she never created never got rid of the onshore offshore yuan wall okay between and he's doing that now knowing full well that if he lets every grand fail in a disorderly manner and doesn't make the foreign bond holders whole does it make the vulture capitalists like paul singer and the rest of those guys whole that that's going to create that's going to help the federal reserve raise dollar demand globally in this moment in time in a short period of time and actually help crash davos and the great reset i absolutely believe that that is what's happening because i'm watching it in the markets every freaking day i've written about this to to to to a great extent if you watch what's happening from the and look i'm no fan of the federal reserve fundamentally right from a philosophical perspective i'm completely and utterly against all all central banking and all the rest of it i'm a hard money guy but i also have to live in the world we have not the world i want in the world we have is one where central banks are all fighting against each other they are in a knife fight against each other and right now if you look at the way the byte administration came to power and has been operating they've been operating to isolate the federal reserve and destroy its credibility in order to save the european central bank a fundamentally different type of central bank which has the capacity to go bankrupt by the way and to save itself by destroying the united states politically culturally economically from within undermining the confidence of the fed of the general markets of the of the us political system such that all the capital flies that existed currently on onshore and fly somewhere else and they wanted to fly to europe why do they wanted to fly to europe so that they can prop up their dying their literally zombie banking system that mario draghi has destroyed through the application of negative interest rates so if you've got the situation where the fed went hawkish in june by draining the world of over 700 billion dollars of real dollars not [ __ ] credit credit dollars we're talking real dollars real euro dollar deposits over 700 billion dollars moved into the reverse repo facility that had just been sitting there doing nothing for years and all of a sudden this year it's now sitting at 1.3 trillion dollars before the fed raised interest rates um on the reverse repo contract to five basis points in june okay that the the the balance there stood at 450 billion dollars today it stands at 1.4 billion he just raised the limit
that any one counterparty in the us can go to the to belly up to the window so he's added another three trillion dollars effectively of capacity to that facility so we could literally pull in up to four trillion dollars from overseas capital right why is he doing that in order to in order to give collateral back to the american banks so that when there's a dollar crisis they have the collateral they need to keep the money markets flush jerome powell is actually [ __ ] brilliant if you want my honest opinion and he's right now under fire from davos because he just lost two of his hawkish fed governors yesterday the day before he got he got harangued by harpy elizabeth warren in the senate hearings this morning and they're trying to get rid of him now because obama wants brainerd to take over at the fed so that we can get full mmt and janet yellen who's a davos troll through and through a [ __ ] through is doing the same thing at the treasury department in every way matters shape and undermine the fed again no fan of the fed but right now right this moment freedom and and every individual who cares about their individual individuality if you want to see the great reset fail jerome powell is the best ally you have right now because he understands the problem and he's actually trying to save the federal reserve and the united states banking system from being torn apart and then handed over to a bunch of europe european old crap oligarchic eugenicists and malthusians i'm dead serious when i say this six months an hour after he saved everything and we go back to kit then we go back to kicking his ass but for right now i think he's the best friend he's the best ally we have and it pains me to say this after 20 years of screaming about end the fed like but it's the only thing that makes any sense when i analyze the go board that i described at the beginning of this it's the only thing that makes any sense because everything i'm seeing tells me that there's a massive split between the fed and davos and china has no interest in being vassals to europe they're not on board with agenda 2030 she's like yeah eventually maybe we'll get carbon neutral by 2050 on our terms when we want it i mean they all give lip service to this stuff because they all i'll be honest with you like if you think that those german eugenicists like schwab and the rest of them don't think that the chinese are anything but ants and that the russians aren't anything but dirty slobs then you've like missed all of european history they freaking hate those people they think they're on they think that they think they're subhuman and therefore you think the chinese and the russians don't know that the europeans think they're they're subhuman or i i think they get that after having been been uh been assaulted by these people for the last 250 years so maybe they formulated some really smart strategies to like say you know what no and i think that's what's happening right now and i think that's the main way that this whole thing is going to start collapsing come the middle of 2022 when the european market start to really collapse which is what i'm expecting to say and i'm beginning to see it now sorry i i started to like grab the mic and go filibuster no no this one this one's hard to explain it's a lot of stuff and i have to take like the 10 minutes to explain it also i agree with most of your points now let's talk about janet yellen for a minute sure what what kind is she a collectivist how would you classify her like what's her belief or philosophy system that makes her different than an american that could be in that post no she's absolutely she's absolutely um she absolutely believes in everything she does she did while she was obama's uh fed chair and um everything that she did she put off tapering qe and all the rest of the whole time she was there and then if you look at what she's been doing since she's been a treasury her whole raise on detroit at treasury is to force trillions of spending for the fed to monetize that it can't monetize without destroying the dollar and to absolutely go after crypto private crypto like everything that she has tried to slip into every spending bill and every budget and every infrastructure bill it's all been absolutely like literally this is language written by davos to outlaw private crypto in the united states like and so no she's absolutely i i've picked i pegged her to be the replacement for bite i think davos is setting up to get rid of joe biden neutralize kamala harris because she's completely worthless the diversity hire that she is and they're going to either put janet yellen or john kerry and install them as president and you can do that through by you can do that by having harris resign a biden to point one of those by vp and then he then he either resigns or dies a covet which is what i think is going to happen i think i think biden's going to die of covert by the way i think what you're seeing in the white house is a stage play and you got obama somewhere in his basement in his pajamas and he's got the biden puppet on he makes him say what he wants to say i mean biden i mean obama said so in a clip like 2017. would he run for a third term he's like well i'd like to do the things but i don't want to do some of these other things so here's how i would do it and it's an exact description of what you're seeing today so from a white house yeah down the street he and susan rice are running are running the uh running the government without a doubt uh valerie jarrett is in there as well they ran a shadow government the entire time trump was in power that's perfect yeah all right susan rice is a rhodes scholar and i want to talk about the history that you mentioned when you mentioned the germans and the eugenics yeah that's bad nazi's bad but the people who funded them and the eugenics they practiced came from the united states and western bankers and those people didn't lose the war they got there was never the bankers trial that held the real bankers accountable and a lot of those people rose to power right after world war ii like nelson rockefeller alan dulles cd jackson uh a whole coterie and and and the people we installed over in all over in germany and then you remember installing the german governments the way we did were were absolutely the marshall plan it's a so i'm going to name this type of collectivism globalism because it's specifically communism or socialism so there's globalism and they needed to crush america because american freedom and american sovereignty stands between them and really taking over the rest of the world so they came up with a very specific plan that was codified in 1902 in the last will and testament of cecil john rhodes who he owned he created the beers i mean he bought out the farmer de beers but he's known for de beers diamonds he helped to consolidate gold mines in south africa helped to colonize it for the british empire and then he left his legacy to be rhodes scholars and to create a secret society the specific purpose of which was to bring america back into the british empire for purposes of world domination he says right so the the cfr bilderberg trilateral these other working groups they're all working toward that same goal get rid of america crush america drag our name through the mud get us associated with foreign wars and and nation building and all these other things being the property managers for the british empire by the way most of the 20th century and then let's bring america to a fall how not through direct conflict because the those globalist powers don't like to do that they'll use propped up powers like they created soviet union russia today they created a red china they david rockefeller funded mao and said it was his greatest experiment and these sort of things these people have groomed china to to be the other end on the vice to do exactly what they're doing right now and so and then they just run the color revolution script which is what they're doing right now here in the united states absolutely absolutely and then they had this whole pandemic break out of a joint operation that you can't tell if it's china or united states but it's definitely not coming out of a batcave what's the battery the way the way i've looked at the way i've looked at um covet it being very obvious to me the day after uh anthony fauci was caught dead to rights by rand paul in the senate and the next day the media all turned 180 degrees and went and john stewart was on the friggin was on with with uh stephen colbert and came out and oh no it's all the lab league it all leaked out of a lav and wuhan remember we weren't allowed to talk about that we would get the platform we would lose our voice we'd lose our bank accounts and everything else if we mentioned that theory in 2020. and all of a sudden in may 2021 we flipped on we flipped 180 degrees on a diet within 24 hours now that tells me one they told me one thing and one thing only davos was now i this is you want my this is this is my working hypothesis of cobit ready yeah oh it's absolutely uh was designed in a laboratory okay that's fine this is and this is my personal opinion i don't have like any i'm not gonna sit here chapter and verse i don't need to but occam's razor game theory this is what it tells me it was created in a laboratory it was created by a very small country of people who and those people reside uh you know deirdre model fine pick your poison as to where it came from yeah and then they just leaked it from the lab in wuhan and they framed the chinese for it because what did the chinese do after it first came out well did they do what the chinese always do when there's a problem locally they cut down they they they clamp down on all external um uh media and everything else they shut everything down and then they and they control the scene because they hate losing face and they don't ever want to show that there's any internal division within china or weakness they never do right this is very it's very asian like this is very asian across the board it would have been no different if this happened in japan to be honest with you and so it would have been there what would have been their purpose of showing the videos of the people collapsing on the streets over well i mean there comes a point i think after that at some point um either that stuff starts to leak out they can't control they remember everybody thinks they have control over the information space peter like davos some of that was real and some of it i've seen recently that was mocked up like that you saw the other third camera view where people were faking things and i was like oh because i thought some of those were the actual well that's that's a good question it is it is a good question but i'll just say i'll just say this you know it it comes to me at some point that when they turn 180 degrees in the middle of this whole thing and now legitimize it going after they're coming from china out of a lab in china then what they wanted then the strategic play at that point is to turn around and go and try and get the united states who's now really angry about what happened over covet to then try and blame the chinese because the goal again multiplayer game of go if you want to take territory how do you do it you take territory by making the player number one and player number two who's in first and second place at the table fight while the player in third place it's the it's just which is just bankruptcy respond which is bankrupt just bankrupt europe then so it tells me it's right it's like straight out of james bond it is doctor no it's like the opening scene his name is fighting fish and one of them waits till the other two get tired and then comes in and gets them both right so it's like it's like this isn't this isn't tough here and these people are very smart and they're very clever well they're smart but they're not very clever they use the same tactics over and over again because as long as those tactics work notice when those tactics don't work they keep going back to the same well see the color revolution script has been debunked putin knows has already shown us how to beat it he's beat it four [ __ ] times now right and they but they keep going to the same well they tried it on china until when in 2019 in hong kong and it didn't work and they tried it in belarus last summer and it didn't work and they're trying it here in the united states and i don't know the whole color revolution format comes from a guy who did uh psyops for the united states gene sharp who wrote wrote a book how to start a revolution i think it was and then it was adopted as their as the code i wanted to show you this document real quick this is from january 30th to 2020 this is written by a colleague of mine it's titled bats gene editing and bioweapons recent darpa experiments raised concerns amid coronavirus outbreak now this was a couple weeks but america knew about this and this is an excellent article it holds holds up to this day if you were to go and find that on last american vagabond ryan christian site good guy if you read this i've referenced it so many times in podcasts over the past year because whitney continues to point it out the first people that came to us in january 2020 that said we're going to make a vaccine oh it's darpa who licensed mrna to moderna who was a cancer gene therapy company right but darpa's also funding eco health alliance and peter daszak and wuhan lab to do uh fern cleavage uh gain a function outside of and they closed fort dietrich in august 2019. so there's a whole bunch of moving parts there that told me early on no wet market is necessary for this occam's razor absolutely absolutely right yeah oh absolutely i i and i just know the big question is who would benefit from actually letting this thing out and who was right james bond specter could be the globalists use that so someone who works there is like not affiliated with either of the other two national parties but sets them up to fight with each other what's interesting actually and i'll and i'll be honest with you um better than spectre which is winds up being what if you just watch quantum masalas yeah quantum massage literally gives away the entire script okay it's i wish the movie was better directed that's the only one the insider trading is that he's the insider trading guy who literally says and we sell them global warming in order to in order to to to uh to to take over the world and they literally like and all the james like the whole james the daniel craig james bond series up though so i haven't obviously haven't seen the last one has been a story about the end of the british empire and the end of mi6 and they want you to think that it's ended they did that at the beginning of the 1900s too they wanted to end the empire and call the commonwealth and lionel curtis gave all these uh lecturers at columbia to say look we'll never get back and engage with america if we're an empire but if we're commonwealth and we start to diversify we act like we're not an empire anymore i wanted to show you this artifact real quick because it ties into what we were just talking about this is from the club of rome this is the first global revolution a report by the council of the club of rome and in here because you brought up the global warming in the uh james bond script here's where it is this is 1991.
i'm going to put my spectacles on because i'm over 40. i need to be able to see this clearly uh being probioptic sucks doesn't it the common enemy of humanity is man in searching for a new enemy to unite us we came up with the idea that pollution the threat of global warming water shortages famine and the like would fit the bill in their totality and in their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which demands the solidarity of all peoples but in designating them as the enemy we fall into the trap about which we have already worn namely mistaking the symptoms for the causes all these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that if they can be overcome the real enemy then is humanity itself yep well you know they're all agent smith dude it's not that hot they're just asian smith humanity's a virus and i can smell your stink and all that so it's it's just it it literally is that and anyone not conscious becomes an agent smith like plug-in they're like knarking on you to the uh gulag masters i i it's yeah i mean yeah no yeah i get it it's like yup uh-huh i the the worst one the best metaphor though is not fight club is not the matrix or anything the best metaphor for the for the future that they want for us is minority report that's very accurate because stephen's jackpot is the jack buddhism in that is very light and it's very early on it is yeah well we see in that movie we we we get out of their world very quickly once and once john tom cruise gets out up underneath their system so that he can then figure out what's happening no minority report the reason why minority report is so scary is because the pre the precogs are just ai and everything else all of the technology in that movie i i love i like the movies one of the few philippe adaptations i actually like and i'm a huge full okay dick fan um is we go and watch you know own the dvd watch all the extra material and steven spielberg a guy very close to davos well who did he go to if not part of davos himself who did he said like find out like when we built this movie when we were doing pre-production on it what did we do who did we talk to about building a real you know a real extrapolation of the near future well we went to all the great futurists who were out there and literally they we went to the world economic forum to find out what we were going to what what technology was going to be there for us in 15 or 20 years and all the technology that you see in minority report outside of the precogs all you have to do is substitute big data and ai for that it's all in the movie and i remember watching that for the first time by whenever that movie came out with 2002 watching the extra material like 2003 2004 going yeah i'm not going to ever forget this because that is a picture of where we're headed and it was very obvious to me i would like to substantiate your point uh i worked for an artificial intelligence software company at the beginning of this century and the guy who founded the company wrote books his name is earl cox and one of his books was called beyond humanity future technology and cyber evolution and spielberg used it to finish the kubrick film ai and so if you think about it spielberg is in a great place to be able to access anyone get all this research together do predictive programming into the audience so i would say he's above the davos level he's more inner circley understands the agenda and can have a long career arc where every single one of his things meets a demand that they have to program into people that's part of the narrative i i mean look i don't know that's i i don't want one i don't i agree that's speculation so you don't yeah i think so i think i i look at people like spielberg and pelosi and schumer and the rest of this i look at people at that level and i just think yeah they're just if we go back and forth is so such is always he's just such a boomer he's just so obviously a person of that kind of world view that he would be very easy to funnel these ideas into but if we look at history you've got people like hemingway john houston john ford uh frank capra billy wilder all worked for intelligence during world war ii to make propaganda because these people these days they consider it but we've been at war since 9 11. everything's national security interest and wag the dog type no i'm not like the idea that that that that that globalists or commies or whatever aren't like you know running hollywood jesus christ dude like i'm i'm like i'm i'm so far down that rabbit hole i think warner brothers has been sabotaging their own freaking movies for years in order to keep them from from uh you know reaching critical mass i'm like i was telling peter the last time i was on the the minute i watched zach snyder's cut of justice league i'm like that changes the world because that movie was never supposed to see the light of day because the because the powers that be told warner brothers don't release it then they destroyed they destroyed the previous movie batman be superman with the most vandalized that was the most egregious act of artistic vandalism i've seen in quite a while because if you watch the full cut of the movie and you watch the theatrical cut you're like why did you cut those 36 minutes out of the movie because those are the 36 minutes that made the movie make sense and yet we don't know what's in that 21 minutes cut out of eyes wide shut and kubrick died soon thereafter he said no to the cuts you know he has final cut well they're like we finally cut you and now we have final cut so yeah i know i mean it's like it's like everything else so they they ruined brazil they ruined i mean they've done all sorts of things over the years and i think well they've actually taken brazil as their their business plan haven't you noticed we are now living in brazil we call it america but it's terry gilliam's brazil all over it is and and and i think that what's interesting is to watch this play out though where what they don't under what they don't realize is that no matter how much you you you can fill us this is the funny part about it like watch the coen brothers hail caesar if you haven't seen hale caesar which is a brilliant movie um watch that and realize how inept the commies in that movie are and how bad they are actually at like slipping their predictive programming or whatever they're dialectic into this into the thing and yeah you could say that that's a that's a that's a a dodge or whatever i don't think so um where do you fall down on the mccarthy communists i think i think i think joe was i think uncle joe was a was a very interesting guy i think he was absolutely right i'm not crazy about his about his methods because i never i'm never a big fan of anybody using the state to do any of these things but i don't think jungle joe was wrong they were commies you know there were commies in hollywood that's not this is nothing new and in dc and in the white house oh yeah he was vindicated but no one talks about it was the winona transcripts they had tapped all these people but they didn't have the computing power to decrypt and do all this stuff until the 90s because it was soviet communication taps and they found out there's a whole bunch of people that mccarthy pointed out and when i when i went and researched these people it's easy to find their connections also back to british intelligence yeah so it's funny how a lot of powerful commies in this country also we're working with british intelligence and how kim philby was like one of the biggest communist infiltrators or was that his job in the first like they the british have a hard time spying on america so what do they do they send some commies in who also might have links back to mi6 and they puppeted it look like as far as i'm concerned the whole thing is nothing but a big british spy op the cia the senator and the state department are riddled with these freaking linings like i'm dead serious like and the more i think about this the more i'm like it's a special relationship and you shouldn't question why hq is sitting in the back seat of nsa all the time oh no i i i i talk about the stuff on my live stream all the time i'm like no and everybody doesn't why was there british special forces at wake up yeah exactly um and no one wants to talk about the uh the connection between britain and israel and neo-conservatives and the state department and well the new york people are not allowed to talk about their philosophy from the lokud party yeah and the relationship between uh britain and israel is they called it before the state of israel was created there was something called the british israel world federation movement around 1912. and that led to the balfour declaration which said hey english monarchy you guys get kings from our bible and they're like synergistic partners with goals in the middle east and the 20th century's been a mess and there's been a lot of blood spilled because of that special relationship that they have so there is really in my opinion no difference between the intelligence agencies of america the uk and israel and israel is the most aggressive intelligence agency maybe aside from china that we don't know about or hasn't made it to my desk but no it's absolutely the the the confluence of the three of them together is is quite stunning it's enough to be able to take over the world and and do things like what we see going on out there well yeah i just it's like but like everything else i just you know my i think we're reaching the it's the problem with uh with our i mean all the things that we've tried we've talked about here and all the things you've tracked and you know you've you've rabbit holes you've gone down and everything else which is all brilliant and and i don't i accidentally that's the difference what's that i exit them after i enter i know how to find my way out right right my my point being is that what's what's important is to always step back and take the 40 000 foot level and go where are we in the cycle of history how close are we to the end of it's so hard we're living through the peak of the suck for lack of a better term we're living through peak communism okay we really are they keep telling us that it's peak capitalism but they're wrong it's peak communism because they think that somehow that marx writing in the 1850s understood what a debt-based fiat currency and a massive world spanning continuing effect would have on you know he would he would have on his theories like he'd never conceived i was thinking about this this afternoon i'm like like marx had no idea how capitalism could be morphed into the kind of aggressive collectivism that we see today if capitalism failed it failed in 1913 it didn't fail in 2021 okay it fails with the end of the central banks okay that's when communism finally fails because that's communism and money which is the only real thing that matters in this because without money there is no division of labor and without division of labor there is no civilization right i mean without the ability to coin money there was no country that's why i was granted to the congress to coin money but not to print it not print money right right and so this is why private crypto is the fundamental shift technological shift the first real fundamental technological shift that has occurred since the formation of the bank of england since 1694. i mean there's no other way around it because if the truth of the matter was if they had the back doors into bitcoin do you think they wouldn't have used them by now well i don't know because satoshi or somebody's sitting on sixty percent of bitcoin that's never been transacted i i okay uh i'm not i'm not buying i'm not buying it i got a stack of things right starting with the 1988 cryptocurrency in 20 years or 30 years on the cover of the economist right so they projected by 2017 there'd be a global crypto current global digital currency i call it right 1996 nsa writes a paper with mit uh how to make a mint and they're looking for something just like bitcoin and then all of a sudden a couple years later this guy satoshi who maybe an acronym or a group of people we don't know i always look for like what's the evidence and it's missing in this case so i have to step in with belief and be like okay satoshi was a good well-meaning libertarian-minded individual who has this idea for you know puts it all together right and then uses nsa 256 ssj256 right is that what it is right so there's a little bit of government technology a little bit of government id and in the middle with satoshi so i was skeptical for a long time but also i didn't want to miss the boat so i've had some bitcoin in one form or another since like 2014. right well the the thing is i i wrote my first bitcoin article for blue rockwell back in 2010.
okay i was literally user 37 at the original bitcoin forums okay arguing this is regression theorem and bitcoin all right how it could potentially become a money yeah so this is where i go with this and i and i've already been down that rabbit hole i was an eagle guy i was a liberty dollar guy i've been i was i was already you got any gold backs i got gold backs now too i got from that so so my um no i don't have any of those i just have i just i just have physical gold um my point is is that even if bitcoin and the original idea of bitcoin was built by government spooks as a trojan horse the space today every crypto anarchist in the world is writing code that is being is built on non-government um backdoored potentially backdoor encryption algorithms multi-protocol crypto i mean there are there's a half a dozen better versions of bitcoin out there proof of work style utxo blockchains that can are that are that are running for quicker transactions faster cheaper quicker transactions are running on five different protocols i can name five of them off the top of my head okay i mean that i mean that i and then i had that all have pros and cons that i because i i you know i would agree it appears that even if they started it it got out of hand they couldn't control it and that's why they gave ross a double life sentence plus 240 million dollar fine which is about 10 of what they claimed so it's almost like if he had the 240 million and paid 10 he could be just like hsbc when they get caught money laundering and just pay 10 slap on the wrist and go about his business they never paid they never no don't give them that much credit hsbc never paid more than point one percent i i i i mean my broker's fees are higher than that for [ __ ] sake i interviewed hsbc whistleblower and he said when they made when hsbc made the payment it disappeared the government had no record of it it just went into the ether like it's who is it's the hong kong shanghai bank corporation from the opium days of the british empire that's who hsbc was and uh the fbi director who's a tall guy james not um yeah comey comey he's on the board i'm pretty sure he's the dude on the board at hsbc that gave 100 million dollars to hillary clinton so when all that stuff was going on with trump i was like this is right this game is so rigged it's not even funny it's not even funny to me to me the hong kong riots after the extradition law that went through uh that china put in place i i took one look at that and i saw the the riots go crazy i'm like oh that's the british empire not one of their mi6 guys who currently work at standard charter and hsbc not wanting to get uh remanded back to to mainland china where they can get waterboarded and give up all the damn secrets like that's exactly the way i read it and i'm correct because everything we've seen since then has been china then drawing in and kicking out all the ngos and drawing and drawing back in and becoming and becoming um a more of a walled garden and kicking out the globalists and the global solar screening i mean george soros called gene you like the devil the other day i'm like yes takes one to no one i thought it was pretty ballsy when they deep six jack ma for a while right when he talked out of school and then how charlie munger came in and it's like oh that boy is talking out at school and he what he got he deserved and i was like [ __ ] man because that tells me that munger and buffet and gates and those guys they work well with xi jinping and then now and now xi is turning on them as well well that's because was one of the is one of those tall poppies that needed to be knocked down because jack ma went out and said we're going to change the end we're going to you know remake the world the the chinese monetary system and the pboc was like uh no you're not and that was the end of that and so and everything that the chinese have done since then i was i've been i've been on this story not as much publicly as i i mean i talk about it every once in a while publicly epstein jack ma well i i i've been talking about with my patrons behind the scenes i write private stuff with my patrons all the time and we've been chatting about this and i and i i hadn't put all the clues together one day a
2021-10-02 18:15