Einstein's Quantum Riddle - NOVA

Einstein's Quantum Riddle - NOVA

Show Video

We. Live in a world where objects, have permanence. And. We. See cause then. Effect. But. A startling, phenomenon. Is revealing, that this is not how the universe works, at the smallest scales, of atoms and tiny particles. Albert. Einstein argued, it couldn't, possibly be real, einstein, was like a jack-in-the-box every, day he pop up with a new challenge but, after a century of disputes, and discoveries, the. Experiment, just beautiful, we're. Using it to create revolutionary. New technologies. What. We have here is a, quantum, playground, we. Want to push the technology, as both, possible, it's perhaps the strangest concept. In physics we're, left with conclusions that make no sense whatsoever yet. It could be what forms the very fabric, of our cosmos, in the end we just have this quantum, mechanical, world there's no space anymore it's. Like being an Alice in Wonderland everything. Is possible, could. It be real. It's. Einstein's, quantum. Riddle, right. Now on, Nova. Major. Funding for Nova is provided by, the, following. Is. Reality, and illusion. Could. Something here. Mysteriously. Effect something, there. A century. Of discoveries, in physics reveals. A strange counterintuitive. Microworld. Of atoms and tiny particles, that. Challenges, our intuitive, understanding. Of the world we see around us. It's. Known as quantum, mechanics. This. Strange, theory, has enabled us to develop the remarkable, technologies. Of our digital, age. But. It makes a very troubling, prediction. Called. Quantum, entanglement. Entitlement. Is this very, powerful but. Strange, connection, that. Exists between pairs of particles. Even. If they very far apart in, the way they're always coordinated. Nature's. Fundamental. Building blocks could be connected, and influence. Each other instantaneously. As if. The space between them doesn't, exist as, if. Two, objects, can mirror each other without, any apparent, connection. Einstein. Called it spooky, action at, a distance he. Rejected the idea I tried, to prove it couldn't, be real you, could have situations, where the, cause and the effect happen, at the same time. But. If entanglement, isn't real, cutting-edge. Technologies. Could be in jeopardy, quantum. Computers, quantum, encryption they, depend, on entanglement being a fact in the world. Underlying. It all is a profound, question. Do. We live in Einstein's universe. Of common-sense laws. Or. A bizarre, quantum. Reality, that, allows spooky, connections, across, space, and time. 300. Miles off the coast of West Africa on. One of the Canary Islands, a team.

Of Physicists, is, setting up a remarkable, experiment, that will use almost the entire breadth, of the universe. To. Settle the question. Is. The seemingly, impossible, phenomenon. Of quantum entanglement an illusion. Or. Is it actually, real. Leading. The team is Anton, Zeilinger. In, towards, the rock. Gideros ChaCha's. It's, perfect, today. It's. A precarious, undertaking. They've. Got a short window on two of Europe's largest telescopes. Each. One will simultaneously focus. On a different quasar, an, extremely. Distant galaxy, emitting. Huge amounts, of light from its core. This. Light will, be used to control precise, equipment, that, must be perfectly, aligned to, make measurements on tiny subatomic, particles. And. If, that isn't tricky enough the. Weather on the mountain is notoriously unpredictable. The. Team needs perfect, conditions, for the experiment, to work. In the end it could be running smoothly for. This. Little bit a couple decisions, made you. Know in, the extracted, state in the last instance. With. The experiment finally. Set up the. Team takes their positions. David. Kiser has worked on this experiment with his colleagues Jason, Colicchio and Andy, Friedman for, four years. Coordinating. It all is Dominic Roush, the. Experiment, is his thesis project, and it's, been years, in the making but. As. Darkness falls, temperatures. On the mountain begin to drop. Okay. Okay. Okay. There's bad news they, have been told to leave the villain partial because the road will be so dangerous too dangerous so they have to go, down there yeah. The. Next day the. Team prepares for, another attempt. They. Verify, the equipment, hasn't been affected by the weather. But, now the, air is thick with clouds. Yes, the humidity, with the various telescopes, and you see the. Humidity, is all that percent so. As long as this. Lasts. We. Can't do much. The. Teams at both telescopes. Wait. But. The clouds don't, clear. All, the preparation, has, come to nothing. Time. On these huge telescopes, is precious and, theirs. Has, run out, this. Ambitious, test of quantum entanglement must. Wait. Why. Are physicists. So determined, to put this bizarre, aspect, of quantum mechanics, to the ultimate, test to. Explore. The beginning of the story David, Kaiser has come to Brussels. The. City that Albert Einstein, traveled to in 1927. To, attend, a meeting about a new theory, that described, the microworld of atoms and tiny particles. Quantum. Mechanics. Quantum. Mechanics is one of those amazing, intellectual. Achievements, in human history. For. The first time scientists. Were able to probe. A world, that was until. Then quite, invisible to us looking. At the world at the scale of atoms a million. Times smaller than the, width of a human hair one. Way to think about the scales is that if you take an everyday object like a soccer ball. And. You. Enlarge, that soccer ball so that actually you can see the, individual, atoms you're, if you have to make it the. Size of the earth and. Then. Move, into that planet. Then. You are in, the world of atoms and particles. It. Was the nature of fundamental. Particles, which make up the world we, see around us, that, Einstein, had come to Brussels, to discuss and. It. Was here that Einstein, entered into a heated debate that. Would lead to the discovery of quantum. Entanglement. A concept. That would trouble him for, the rest of his life. David. Kiser has come to the place where it all began. This. Is the original Solvay, Institute, building, beautiful. Grand building, and this is the place, back in October. 1927. Where. The fifth Sauve conference was held, there's. An amazing, week, long series of discussions, on really, what the world is made of on the nature of matter the, new quantum, theory and these. Steps, are, the very steps. On. Which this famous. Group, photograph, was taken is. A collection, of some, of the most brilliant, people in the world here. In the front row we, see Albert Einstein, and the great Marie Curie INBOX plunk in the back row standing, the dapper, Aaron Schrodinger, and he's could have brash 20 year olds in mid 20s Verner, Heisenberg, and Wolfgang Pauli. These. Scientists. Were the pioneers of quantum, mechanics, I had. A huge, version, of this photograph up on the wall was a poster, in my college dorm room my roommates. Had their favorite bands and I had to the 1927. Solvay conference which. Says a lot, this. Was one of the greatest meetings, of minds in history. More. Than half were, or would become, Nobel.

Prize Winners. Their. Experiments. Were showing that. Deep inside matter, tiny. Particles, like, atoms and, their orbiting, electrons, were. Not solid, little spheres. They. Seemed fuzzy, and, undefined. So. This, group here this these these were the folks who had just been. Plumbing. Deeper, and deeper and deeper to. Find what, they hope will be a bedrock, of what the world is made of and to, their surprise they found things, less and less solid, as they dug in this, world was not tiny, little bricks that got smaller smaller at some point the bricks gave way to this mush, and what. Looked like solidity, solidness, in fact became very confusing, and and kind, of a whole new way of thinking about nature. The. Theory of quantum mechanics. Presented, at the meeting was. Strange. It. Said that a particle like, an electron, isn't. Physically, real, until. It's observed. Measured. By an instrument that can detect, it. Before. It's detected, instead. Of being a solid, particle an electron. Is just, a fuzzy, wave a, wave. Of, probability. These. Objects. Like electrons, are atoms, when we describe mathematically. Their. Behavior, the only thing we can describe is the probability. Of being, at one place, or another, it's. Like a wave of all those different possibilities, it's. Not that the electron is in, one place or the other we just don't know is that, the electron really, is a combination. Of every possible, place it could be until. We look at it. Quantum. Mechanics, only, tells us the probability of a particles, properties, like. Location. Laws. Of nature were no longer definite. Statements, about what's going to happen next, they, were just statements, about probabilities, and. Einstein, thought well that's defeat, you're, giving up on the, heart of what physics, has been namely. To give a complete, description of reality. For. Einstein. The. Idea that particles, only pop, into existence when, they're observed, is. Akin to magic. It, said he asked, do, you really believe the moon is not there when you are not looking at it. Outside. Of the formal setting of the conference. He. Challenged, the most vocal supporter, of these ideas, the. Great Danish, physicist, Niels Bohr. Eyesight. Would show up to breakfast, at the hotel and, Niels, Bohr would be there and Iceland.

Would Present his latest challenge Niels. Bohr was sort of mumble, and Wonder, and and, confer, with his younger colleagues, they'd head off to the formal, meeting at the Institute and somehow. Every, night by suppertime Bohr, would have an answer one. Of the observers said that Einstein, was like a jack-in-the-box every, day he'd pop up with a new challenge and Bohr. Would flip, this way in that in the end by supper have crushed that one and it would start all over again. -. Bohr and his colleagues, quantum. Mechanics, not only explained, experimental. Results, it's. Mathematics. Were elegant, and beautiful. And. Since. Einstein hadn't. Found flaws in their equations, they. Left the solve a meeting feeling, more confident, than ever in their ideas. But. Einstein, didn't, give up his conviction, that quantum, mechanics was. Flawed and. In. His refusal to accept the weird implications. Of the theory, he. Would wind up uncovering, something, even, weirder. In. 1933. With, the Nazi Party in power in Germany, Einstein. Chose to settle in America and took. A position at the Institute, for Advanced Study in, Princeton New, Jersey. He. Recruited two physicists, to help him Nathan. Rosen and Boris. Podolsky and. In. 1935. At afternoon, tea. The. Three men spotted a possible, flaw in quantum, mechanics that. Would shake the very foundations. Of the theory. They. Noticed that the mathematics, of quantum mechanics. Led. To a seemingly, impossible, situation. Today. Robert. Dygraf, is the director, of the Institute. Apparently. Poodles can say well professor Einstein this. Is very important, in your arguments. Showing. That quantum. Theory is incomplete. So. The god is very animated, discussion, and what happened. Still is now you have a bunch of scientists. Discussing, and at some point someone. Says let's write a paper together so. They did. Their. Paper known. Today as EPR. Argued. That the equations, of quantum mechanics. Predicted. An impossible, connection. Between particles. A. Seemingly. Magical effect. It. Would be like having two particles. Each. Hidden, under a cup. Looking. At one. Mysteriously. Causes, the other to, reveal itself - with. Matching, properties. Quantum. Theory suggested, this effect could happen in the real world. For. Example with particles, of light. Photons. The. Equations, implied that a source of photons, could. Create pairs, in, such a way. That, when we measure one. Causing. It to snap out of its fuzzy state. The. Other mysteriously. Snaps out of its fuzzy state at the same instant, with, correlated. Properties. The. 1935. Paper that described, this effect has. Become Einsteins, most, referenced, work of all. It. Has captivated, generations. Of physicists. Including. Anton. Zeilinger. The. Einstein-podolsky-rosen. Paper, fascinated. Me and I, had to read it at, least five or six times until I finally understood, what's going on and, then it didn't, let. Me go again. Another. Way to think of the paired particles, is, to imagine a game of chance that somehow, rigged, I, suppose. I, had, a. Pair. Of quantum, dice I. Put. These two quantum, dice in my little. Cup. Throw. Them. Now. Look at them they show the same number six I put. Them again in the chart throw. Them again.

Now. They both show three, I put. Them in again, so. Again. Now. They both show one. Point. Now being what I see here is I see. Two. Random. Processes namely, each die showing. Some number but, these two random, processes to, the same. It's. Really mind-boggling. How. Could two particles, act in unison. Even. When they're separated from each other. Essential. To the EPR argument, is that these particles, can be separated. At, an arbitrary distance, one could be here at Princeton one can be in the Andromeda galaxy and yet, according, to quantum mechanics a choice. To measure something here is somehow. Instantaneously. Affecting, what, could be said about this other particle, you can't, go from Princeton to Andromeda instantly, and yet that they argued is what the equations, of quantum mechanics, seemed to imply and that, they said so much the worse for quantum, mechanics the world simply can't operate that way. For. Einstein, this. Strange, effect, conflicted. With the most basic concept. We use to describe reality, space. For. Him objects. Particles. Everything. That exists, is located. In space. Space. Together, with time was. The key ingredient in his theory of special relativity. With. Its famous equation, e equals. MC. Squared Einstein. Of. Course was the master of space-time. He. Thought that if something happened here, that shouldn't, immediately. And instantaneously. Change something that is going on over there the principle, of locality as, we, currently call it. For. Einstein, it's. Simply, common sense that if objects, are separated. In space. For. One to affect the other something. Must travel between them. And. That. Traveling. Takes time. Quantum. Particles, acting in unison could. Be explained, if they were communicating. One. Particle, instantly. Sending a signal to the other telling. It what properties, it should have. But, that would require a signal. Traveling, faster, than the speed of light, something. Einstein's, theory, of special relativity had. Proven, impossible. And it, would mean the particles, were fuzzy and undefined. Until. The moment they were observed. Instead. I'm, Stein thought the particles, should, be real all along. They. Must carry with them a hidden layer of deeper physics that. Determines, their properties, from the start. Almost. The way that magic, tricks, while. Appearing mysterious. Have. A hidden explanation. But. This hidden, physics, was missing, from quantum, theory so. Einstein Podolsky. And Rosen argued. That quantum, mechanics was. Incomplete. Podolski. Was very enthusiastic about, this, project in fact he was so, enthusiastic that, he ran.

To The New York Times and told. Them the news so, Einstein was, really upset with Podolski and apparently. He didn't speak to him anymore. When. Niels Bohr heard of Einstein's paper he. Wrote an obscure, response. Arguing. That one particle, could somehow, mysteriously, influence. The other. This. Seemingly, impossible phenomenon. Became. Known as quantum. Entanglement. But, Einstein dismissed. It as spooky, actions, at a distance. No, one could think of an experiment, to test whether Einstein, or Bohr was correct. But. That didn't, stop physicists. And engineers from. Making use of quantum, mechanics, to, do new things in. The. 30s, and 40s the, debate. Around the EPR, paper sort, of dies down but. Quantum theory actually takes off. The. Mathematics. Leads to all kinds of amazing, developments. Entanglement. Aside the. Equations, of quantum mechanics, enabled the scientists. Of the Manhattan Project to develop, the atomic bomb, and in. The years after the Second World War. Researchers. At Bell Labs in New Jersey used. Quantum, theory to develop one of the first lasers, in, our laboratories. Men experiment, with a light once, undreamed-of, in the natural world and build. Small, devices, that. Could control, the flow of electricity. Transistors. It's, destined to play a vital role in your future, their. Electronic, future. Transistors. Became, the building, blocks of the burgeoning field of electronics. Computers. Disk, drives the, entire digital. Revolution, soon followed, all, made, possible by, the equations. Of quantum theory. Yet. Einsteins questions. About entanglement, and what, it implied about, the incompleteness, of quantum mechanics, remained. Unanswered. Until. The 1960s. When. A physicist, from Northern, Ireland made. A remarkable, breakthrough. John. Bell. Bell. Was a very, talented young physics, student but he quickly grew dissatisfied, with what he considered almost almost a kind of dishonesty, among his teachers. Bell. Insisted. That Einsteins, questions, about quantum, mechanics had not been addressed, you. Got the shouting, matches with his professors, don't tell, us that Borah solved all the problems this really deserves further, thought, quantum. Mechanics, has been fantastically. Successful, so. It is a very intriguing, situation. The. Foundation, of, all that impressive. Success. There, are these. It's. A very strange thing that ever since the 1930s. The. Idea of sitting and thinking hard by the foundations, of quantum mechanics, has been disreputable. Among. Professional, physicists, when, people tried to do that they were kicked out of physics departments, and so, for someone like Bell he, needed to have a day job doing. Ordinary particle. Physics but, at night you know hidden away he could do work on the foundations, of quantum mechanics. Bell. Became, a leading particle, physicist, at CERN in Geneva but. He continued, to explore, the debate between Einstein, and Bohr. And in. 1964. He, published an astonishing. Paper. Bell proved, that, bores and Einsteins ideas made, different, predictions. If. You could randomly perform. One of two possible, measurements, on each particle, and, check. How often the results, lined up, the. Answer, would reveal whether we lived in Einsteins, world. The. World that followed common-sense laws, or. Bohr's. A world. That was deeply, strange and allowed, spooky. Quantum, connections, we. Now know with hindsight this was one of the most significant, particles in the, history of physics not just the history of 20th century physics in the history of of the, field as a whole. But. Bell's article, appears in this you know sort of out of the way journal in fact the journal itself folds, a few years later this is not central. To the physics community it sort, of dutifully, filed on library shelves and then forgotten, it literally, collects dust on the shelf, a, few. Years later completely. By chance a brilliant. Experimental. Physicist, stumbled, upon Bell's article, I. Thought. This is one of the most amazing, papers. I had ever read in my whole life. And. I. Kept wondering well gee, this is wonderful, but, where's, the experimental. Evidence. John. Worked on Bell's theory, with fellow physicist, Abner Simoni and at. The University, of California, Berkeley started. Work on an experiment, to test it. He. Had a talent for tinkering, in the lab and building. The parts he needed but, used to rummage around here, and scavenge, from dumpster-dive, for old equipment. He. Knew where to find hidden storage, rooms like this which. He could raid to salvage spare parts for his experiments. And. This was a, power. Supply for a diet lasers, that looks. Like something I built. Here's. A picture of the, experiment. I did I had. More hair in those days, here's. Another picture. This. Is Steve Friedman working, on it with me. Piece. By piece, John, clauser and Stuart Friedman, constructed.

The World's, first bail test experiment. They. Focused a laser on two calcium, atoms, causing. Them to emit pairs of photons that. The equations, of quantum theory suggested. Should, be entangled. They. Recorded, whether or not the photons passed through filters, on each side and. Checked. How often, the answers, agreed. After. Hundreds, of thousands, of measurements, if the, pairs were more correlated, than Einsteins, physics, predicted, they. Must be spookily, entangled. We. Saw the stronger, correlation, characteristic. Of quantum mechanics. We. Measured it and that's what we got the. Outcome, was exactly, what Bohr's quantum, mechanics, predicted. The. Experiment, appeared to show that the spooky connections, of quantum, entanglement, did. Exist, in the natural world. Could. It be that the great Albert Einstein, was. Wrong. Remarkably. The. First people to react to this extraordinary, result, were, not the world's, leading physicists. Ronald. Reagan's definition, of a hippie well. Someone who dresses, like Tarzan. Has, hair like Jane, and smells like cheetah. A. Small. Group of free thinking physicists, at the heart of San Francisco's, New Age scene. Got. In touch with John. They. Call themselves the fundamental, physics group they spelled physics with an F some. Members, would experiment with psychedelic. Drugs I mean they were they were kind of in the flow of the, kind of hippie scene and that group was just mesmerized by. The question of entanglement. The, idea was just to discuss fringe subjects, with an open mind and I, thought of sure, that's. Kind of what I do. They. Were doing, their best to, link. Eastern. Mysticism, with. Quantum, entanglement. They. Sold a lot of popular, textbooks, there were a lot of followers. Their. Books became, bestsellers. Like, the, Dow of physics, which. Highlighted, that Eastern, philosophy, and quantum, entanglement, both. Described, the deep connectedness, of things in the universe. Is. The great cosmic, oneness. The. Group held meetings at the iconic Esalen. Institute. It. Was a marvelous. Beautiful, place where. They would discuss all of these ideas it. Was right on the Pacific coast with an overflow, from the hot tubs cascading. Down the cliffs into the Pacific Ocean. To. My knowledge no. Useful. Connections. To Eastern mysticism were, ever discovered by the group. But, it was fun. The. Fundamental. Physics group may, not have uncovered the secrets, of cosmic, oneness. But. In seeing entanglement. As central, to physics they. Were decades, ahead of their time. Forty. Years later, cutting-edge. Labs around the world are, now racing to harness quantum, entanglement, to create, revolutionary. New technologies. Like. Quantum, computers. In. Our everyday. Computers, the, fundamental. Unit of computing, is a bit a binary, digit 0 or 1 and, inside the computer there's all these transistors which, are turning on and off currents, on is one off is zero and these combinations, lead to Universal, computing, with.

A Quantum, computer you, start with a fundamental, unit that's not a bit but a quantum bit which. Is not really. A 0 or a 1 but it can be fluid a. Quantum. Bit makes use of the fuzziness of the quantum, world a. Qubit. As it's known can, be 0 or 1 or a, combination, of both a. Particle. Or tiny quantum, system, can. Be made into a qubit and today, it's, not just pairs of particles that can be entangled, groups. Of qubits can be linked with entanglement, to create. A quantum. Computer. They're. More cubits the. Greater the processing, power. At. Google's, quantum, computing, laboratory in Santa Barbara, the. Team has recently succeeded, in creating a tiny chip that. Holds an array of 72. Qubits. The. Task for researcher, Marisa geo steena and her colleagues, is. To send signals, to these microscopic, qubits, to, control and entangle, them. Mounted. On the underside, of this plate we, have the, quantum processing, chip itself in. Essence a quantum, playground, you could say each. Qubit, is a, quantum, object, that, we should be able to control at will. Thinking. About it as. The. Faster, version of that, PC over there would, be a, great. Flight to this it. Can be much more than that. By. Using entangled. Qubits, quantum. Computers, could tackle real-world problems, that traditional, computers, simply, can't cope with. For, example, a salesman, has to travel to several cities and wants. To find the shortest route. Sounds. Easy but. With. Just 30 cities, there. Are so many possible, routes that. It would take an ordinary computer, even a powerful, one hundreds. Of years, to, try each one and, find, the shortest. But. With a handful, of entangled, qubits a quantum. Computer could. Resolve the optimal, path in a fraction, of the number of steps. There's. Another reason teams like Marisa's are racing, to create a powerful, quantum, computer. Cracking. Secret, codes. In, today's world everything, from online shopping, to covert, military communications. Is protected. From hackers using. Secure, digital codes. Process. Called, encryption. But what if hackers could. Get hold of quantum, computers, a quantum. Computer could crack. Our best encryption, protocols, in minutes whereas, a regular. Computer or even a supercomputing, network today couldn't do it you know given months of time. But. While quantum, entanglement, may be a threat to traditional, encryption. It. Also offers an even more secure, alternative. A communication. System that the very laws of physics protect, from, secret hacking. Researchers. In China are. Leading, the way. Here, in Shanghai. At. The University, of Science and Technology. Jian. Way path runs. A leading quantum Research Centre. His. Teams are working to harness the properties, of the quantum, world. They. Can send secret messages using. A stream of photons in, a system, that instantly, detects, any attempt, to eavesdrop. Jan, weighs team has created a network of optical, fibers more than a thousand, miles long that. Can carry secure, information, from, Beijing, to, Shanghai. It. Is used by banks and data, companies. But. There's a limit to how far quantum, signals, can be sent through optical, fibers. To. Send signals, further Jan. Weighs team launched, the world's first quantum. Communication. Satellite. Above. Earth's atmosphere, there, are fewer obstacles and quantum. Particles, can travel much further. Each. Night teams, on the ground prepare. To track the satellite across, the skies. Laser, guidance, equipment locks, on and allows, signals, to be sent and received. The. Team aims to use this equipment to create a new secure. Communication. System using. Quantum, entanglement. The. Satellite, sends entangled, photons to two users, an. Eavesdropper. Could intercept. One of the entangled, photons. Measure. It and, send. On a replacement, photon. But. It wouldn't be an entangled. Photon its properties, wouldn't, match it. Would be clear an eavesdropper. Was on the line. In. Theory, this technique, could be used to create a totally, secure global, communication. Network so. The next step is will, have grown station, for example, in Canada and, also, in Africa and a manic country so, we will use our satellite, for, the global corn communication. We. Want to push this technology, as far as, possible. These. Are the first steps in creating a completely unhackable, quantum. Internet of the future, made. Possible, by, quantum, entanglement. But. There's a problem. What. If quantum entanglement. Spooky. Action at a distance. Isn't. Real after, all. It.

Could Mean entangled, photons are not the path to complete, security. The. Question, goes back to clauser and Friedman's, Bell test experiment. In. The, years after their pioneering, work. Physicists. Began to test possible loopholes. In their experiment. Ways, in which the illusion, of entanglement, might be created. So. The effect might, not be so spooky, after all. One, loophole is. Especially, hard to rule out. In. Modern, bell test experiments. Devices. At each side test, whether the photons, can pass through one of two filters, that, are randomly, chosen. Effectively. Asking one of two questions and checking. How often the answers agree. After. Thousands, of photons if, the, results, show more agreement, than Einsteins, physics, predicts the. Particles, must, be spookily, entangled. But. What if something had mysteriously, influenced. The equipment, so. That the choices of the filters, were, not truly, random. Is. There any common. Cause deep. In the past before, you even turn on your device that. Could have nudged the questions, to be asked and the types of particles to be emitted maybe some strange, particle, maybe some force that had not been taken into account so, that what looks like entanglement, might indeed be an accident. An illusion, maybe the world still acts like Einstein thought. It. Is this loophole at. The team at the high altitude Observatory, in the Canary Islands, is working, to tackle. With. Quantum, mechanics now, more established, than ever they're. Determined, to put entanglement, to the ultimate, test and finally. Settle the Einstein, Bohr debate beyond all reasonable. Doubt. The. Team is creating a giant version of clauser and Friedman's Bell test with. The entire universe, as their, lab bench. In. This. Cosmic. Bell test. The. Source of the entangled, particles, is. About 1/3 of a mile from each of the detectors. The. Team must send perfectly, timed pairs of photons through, the air to, each side, at. The same time the, telescope's, will collect light from two extremely, far-off, extremely. Bright galaxies, called, quasars. These. Are among the brightest, objects, in the sky emitting. Light, in powerful, jets. Random. Variations, in this light will, control which filters, are used to measure the photon pairs and. Since. The quasars, are so far away the. Light has been travelling for billions, of years to reach Earth. It. Makes it incredibly unlikely, that anything, could be influencing. The random nature of the test. If. The experiment is successful the. Team will have tackled the loophole, and shown, that quantum, entanglement, is as, spooky as Bohr always, claimed. Dominic. And Jason are at one telescope, London. Anton. Is at, the other. Jagadamba. Kazar in field of view in, that years. Yeah. Karif engineered, the contrast is super lost. Okay. Ciao. With, clear skies, finally. Overhead, the. Huge telescopes, awakened. Poised. To collect light from distant quasars. Moving. Into. The. Dark, on living. So. We're doing everything to everything. Everyone's now so, the. Guys for the Ling's are, setting the state of. The integrant photon pair we try to acquire the quasar, we're. Just centering, it and, making. The feet of your small as possible to be sure to be pulling you have the quasar. Okay. It's, guiding now yes. Okay. This one. Alright, good, good yes. Yeah. That's good. It. Looks like I need let's. Say 91, to be conservative a period. With. The telescopes, now locked on to two different quasars. The. Team begins, to take readings. We. Do to fool the. Fook opening both is what. Yeah. We're doing a fool cause we both is. It's. Working. Right. From the quasars, is, selecting, which filters, are used to measure the entangled. Photons. This, is exciting. It, is now. We do, have a test but it's.

Not. Clear, what the outcome will be. Going. Everything. Is exactly the same beautiful perfect. Two. Months later back, in Vienna the. Team analyzes, the experimental. Data, this. Might. Take a second. The. Numbers look really great and it. Is extremely, pleasing to see that all these work so nice. We. Clearly. See correlations, that correspond, to quantum mechanics. The. Results, show, entanglement. And since. The light from the quasar is, controlling, the test was. Nearly eight billion, years old, it's. Extremely, unlikely that anything could have affected, its random nature. This. Remaining, loophole, seems. To be closed. The experiment, it is just, fantastic the big, cosmos, comes down to, control. A small quantum, experiment, but that in itself is a it's, beautiful. You. Know honestly I still I still get chills I mean ice. When. I realize what our team was able to do in, this intellectual. Journey that stretches back to the early years of the 20th century, there's. There's hardly. Any room left for. A kind, of alternative, Einstein. Like explanation. We. Haven't ruled it out but, we've shoved it into such a tiny corner of the cosmos, as to, make it even. More implausible, for, anything other than, entanglement. To explain our results. Accepting. That entanglement, is a part of the natural world around us has, profound. Implications. It. Means we must accept, that an action, in one place can have, an instant effect anywhere, in the universe as if. There's no space between, them. Or. That. Particles, only take on physical, properties, when. We observe them. Or, we must accept both. We. Were left with conclusions about the universe that, make no sense whatsoever. Science. Is stepping, outside of all of our boundaries of common sense someone. Was like being an Alice in Wonderland right, where everything. Is possible. It. Was first seen as an unwelcome, but unavoidable consequence. Of quantum mechanics. Now. After, nearly a century of disputes, and discoveries. Spooky. Action at a distance is. Finally. At the heart of modern physics. At. The Institute, for Advanced Study where. The concept, of entanglement was first described. Researchers. Are now using it in their search for a single, unified, theory, of the universe the.

Holy Grail of physics. Einstein's. Theories, of special, and general relativity. Perfectly. Described space time, and gravity at, the. Largest, scales of the universe. While. Quantum, mechanics. Perfectly. Describes, the tiniest, scales. Yet. These two theories have. Never been brought together. So. Far we've not yet had a single. Complete, theory that, is both quantum, mechanical, and reproduces. The prediction, of Einstein's wonderful. Theory, of general relativity. Maybe. The, secret is, entanglement. What. If space itself, is actually created, by the tiny quantum, world. Just. Like temperature, warm. And cold, consists. Simply of the movement, of atoms inside. An object. Perhaps. Space, as we know it emerges. From networks, of entangled, quantum particles. It's. A mind-blowing. Idea. What. We are learning these days is that we might have to give up that. What Einstein hold sacred namely, space and time so he, was always thinking while we have little pieces of space and time and out, of this we built the, whole universe. In. A radical theory known. As the holographic. Universe, space. And time are created, by entangled. Quantum particles. On a sphere. That's. Infinitely, far, away. What's. Happening, in space in some sense all. Described. In terms of a screen outside here. The. Ultimate, description, of reality resides. On this screen think of it as kind of quantum. Bits living, on that screen and this. Like, a movie, projector creates. A illusion. Of, the. Three-dimensional reality, that I'm now experiencing. It. May be impossible, to intuitively, understand. This wild, mathematical. Idea. But. It suggests that, entanglement. Could. Be what forms, the true fabric, of the universe. The, most puzzling, element, of, entanglements, that you know somehow two points, in, space can, communicate. Becomes. Less of a problem because space itself has disappeared, in. The, end we just have this quantum, mechanical, world there is no space anymore and. So. In some sense the paradoxes. Of entanglement. The, EPR paradox disappears. Into, thin air. Truly. Understanding, quantum mechanics, will, only happen when we put ourselves on, the entanglement, side and, we stop privileged, in the world that we seem and start, thinking about the world as it actually is. Science. Has made enormous, progress for, centuries by, sort of breaking complicated. Systems down into parts when, we come to phenomena like quantum entanglement that scheme, breaks. When. It comes to the bedrock, of quantum mechanics, the. Whole is more, than, the sum of its parts. The, basic, motivation, is just. To learn how nature works, what's. Really going on. Instance. Ed it very nicely he's not interested in this detail question, of that detailed question, he. Just wanted, to know what. Were God's thoughts, when. He created the world. Major. Funding for Nova is, provided by, the, following. To. Order this nova program on DVD visit. Shop PBS, were, called 1-800. Play PBS. This, program is also available on, Amazon Prime, video. You.

2019-01-14 18:28

Show Video

Comments:

There's a ratio in the results of these experiments between how many particles come out entangled and how many don't. I was disappointed that this ratio was not compared between the experiments, which would show that, if the ratios matched, the results of the experiments were consistent. However, if the ratios don't match, there would still be unanswered questions about something unknown possibly impacting the experiments. Still, happy to know that this debate has been settled and entanglement is inherent in the universe.

Einstein was right: "God does not play dice with the universe." If two particles exist in two different galaxies, and react to each other, no, they are not sending a signal of communication back and forth to each other, they have been programmed to act the way they do by the same entity, possibly eons ago.

Wow mind-blowing! just as good as "The Fabric of the Cosmos" https://youtu.be/rfT9HV65JkI :)

Albert discarded the Quantum theory. I guess it was because a JOO didn't invent it?!?

bit of a mislead at 35:00 where it sounds implied that a quantum computer can use its 'exponentialness' to solve NP-complete problems efficiently, which is false... smh lol

quantum computers could be useful in finding fast/better approximate solutions to NP-complete problems like traveling salesman, but an algorithm for a guaranteed optimal solution will still take exponential time even with quantum resources (otherwise BQP=NP or something like that which is a much stronger claim than any quantum computer scientist is claiming)

my nose is bleeding....my brain

Can the power of quantum entanglement be leveraged to develop faster than light communication?

No. Due the this no-go theorem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-communication_theorem

of course

+Andromeda M31 Archimedes might concur but maybe he would change his mind

No. The whole business is subtle and complicated. The end result is always the same, though: While it's one of the weirdest and coolest phenomena in physics, there is no way to use quantum entanglement to send messages faster than the speed of light.

Definitely! all you need is a fairly large lever.

MY BRAIN MY BRAIN!!, IT HUUUURTS!!!

+jeffwads "Nothing in science is ever settled."? Well, that settles that, doesn't it.

+Robert Cathcart Your opinion matches Herr Hitler's. From Germany, he expelled those engaged in "Jewish Physics". It didn't work out so well for him and Germany Then again, his prediction of a "Thousand Year Reich" was off by only 988 years.

Einstein was a horrendous Jew show pony who could not experimentally prove any of his mathematical theories -- he was so dumb he did not even know that in the Galaxy we live in there is no such thing as time and space there is only matter and energy.

+jeffwads A climate change denier who doesn't know the definition of the words he uses? I would expect nothing else. Definition of settled: to resolve or reach an agreement about an argument or problem. The word you were searching for was "proven". The sentence you thought you were writing: Nothing in science is ever proven. One definition of the word "proven" is beyond a shadow of a doubt and it would be correct to say nothing in science is ever proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. However, another definition of the word "proven" is: demonstrate the truth or existence of (something) by evidence or argument, which science does all the time. So climate change is settled both because 99% of climate scientists say it's happening (the agreement), but more importantly, because average global temperatures have increased 1.4 degrees F since 1880 (the evidence). If you were trying to say that it's not settled that climate change is caused by human activities, then that's another topic. On that topic, first you showed that you are not a scientist because no scientist would leave out that criterion and expect everybody to know what they meant, and second, it's pretty much settled (agreed by the vast majority of climate scientists) that global warming which leads to climate change is caused by man made activities. So please educate yourself on the definitions of the words you use and the agreement of the scientists who study the settled topic of climate change.

Nothing in science is ever settled. You are the type of person that thinks Climate Change is indisputable. Please educate yourself.

I think Albert Einstein was right and as for Google's Quantum computing (D wave) is a stratagem to Help keep Alphabet Inc $tock High I don't think it works as well as they tell use, smoke and mirrors! what do i know.....Zero.

sorry folks they now have 100% proof that entanglement cant have one particle do what other does at faster then light speed ....hahah shows how dated this is

Thanks for the video. It is welcome

So... I guess its still a 'Riddle' ...i dont know why i thought there would be an answer finally here .. i'm sure when theres a breakthrough we'll all hear it long before theres a documentary about it that may describe it .. that is if its allowed to be described as it would be revolutionary .....

It's all relative to Einstein and his wife can attest to that.

Quantum Entanglement = When Nancy Pelosi takes a tinkle, & Chuck Schumer does the same into the sandy beach In Puerto Rico.

PBS has turned into the Discovery Channel will sucking the Koch Brothers withered old cocks......

"While"....Unless you were asking a question that you didn't finish...or actually start...Like , for instance...BLAH-BLAH-BLAH Discovery Channel! Will sucking..............help the situation? If that is what you meant I suggest that it wont help....But you never know...Give it a shot if you feel inclined.

These are delusional scientists; they are not even in the ballpark. Relativity, quantum mechanics, entanglement, the big bang, inflation, black holes, strings, multidimensional universes and just about everything else orthodox physics and cosmologist postulate are Alice-in-Wonderland notions. Science today is in the same boat as gods and religions, it’s all made up. To understand what the universe really is, you have to start over from scratch and only use tangible facts. The most obvious place to start is defining the physical nature of space, since space is an indisputable fact and composes the biggest part of the picture. Scientist look through space, at what was in it, but neglected to decipher the actual physical nature composing space itself. It is an error so large, that it invalidates everything physicists and cosmologists believe. The Rosetta Stone was always in front of them, but they looked through it and missed its importance. You can start your reeducation by learning about Protospace: http://www.mediafire.com/file/eaymr362g4uflko/Protospace_2019_continued.docx/file It is five pages long and will change how you view space itself. Let me know if you have any questions or what you think? Travel well in your journey of discovery…

The electronic revolution was not made possible by quantum mechanics but in spite of it. When building modern micro electronics quantum affects must be considered and built in error elimination to correct for it. To this day all that Quantum Mechanics / Theory have proven is that we have an incomplete definition of Space. It actually lends some credibility of String Theory which postulates 12 Dimension nSpace. Reality might actually be best described as The Alpha and the Omega, The Beginning and the End Existing as one. Another revelation from the Bible that might be describing some deeper truths poorly understood.

Spooky action at a distance has been defined and proven without Quantum. This has been known for over a hundred years. Simple, easy and no need for fabricating endless math to describe quantum, when quantum does not exist nor can it.

Flashy lights and dramatic music is the only way someone would give this a green light

I feel like the narrator should say, "I know I know, just trust me ok". Like every 4 mins or so.... Explaining his statements like some early 2000s banker, "you see the great benefit to you is its an adjustable rate setting that's compounded quarterly and then rounded down to the nearest decimal therefore saving you money when we stretch it out 30 years + a late stage refi, mm Kay."!?

I would have thought that with all of these High energy minds, the answer would have seemed simple. Go back to the beginning. The Big Bang. There were millions of dimensions in those first instants of release. Most of them disappeared before the first millionth of time had stabilized. Some of those dimensions were Huge, some were exceedingly small. But they all shared one thing in common. They all shared the same Universe. What we observe is just that, observable. What we cannot observe (yet) is that sameness in the Universe. That means that all particles have a connection in all dimensions where a light year in our universe is less than the distance between two particles in another.

what is a holographic tube? what's realities frame rate?

All the expert YouTube “scientists” bashing the video, with no insightful or useful additions of their own. If you really disagree, go out and perform the leg work to explain your position, otherwise pipe down.

QM makes a solid promise to mother nature to construct emergent elementary particles as in hydrogen and oxygen so H2O is reliably H2O. The fuzziness you talk about cannot evolve into anything reliable unless local entanglement brings local order. Universal entanglement is like reading the synapse in the mind of God on the largest scale... It's a religion. You should apply your genius to cleaning up the H2O of Flint Michigan.

Quantum computers on spacecraft? What does that mean for manned spaceflight?

https://archive.org/details/@ratterfat_mcwhiskers for historic NOVA shows

Now identify what is not entangled ? Lol Got to think it would be fun working in the lab together . Thanks All , Thanks be

What's the name of the song that starts at 43:30

Interstellar Travel from the album "The Energetic Orchestra" Laurent Dury, JC Lemay ... on Spotify

Quantum physics explains ghosts and psychic phenomenon, if particles are shared we might share thoughts and experiences, no one can say how entangled we all are

“The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence.” Nikola Tesla My CV is in computer engineering and aircraft engineering but I have a graduate degree in Psychology.  In my studies, to best understand what seems to me a disconnect within ourselves, I found some interesting research.  First of all I found Psychology to be grounded in Science...roughly grounded but grounded.  Method: As Aristotle stated, to understand all things you must go to their beginnings. In the beginnings of science there were three guys who were essentially frustrated with not being able to study what in their time was called meta-physical. (Metaphysics is the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature of existence, being and the world. Arguably, metaphysics is the foundation of philosophy. Aristotle calls it "first philosophy" (or sometimes just "wisdom"), and says it is the subject that deals with"first causes and the principles of things" Metaphysics. Metaphysics is a difficult branch of Philosophy,but is rather easy to define: It is the study of the most fundamental concepts and beliefs about them. Examples of metaphysical concepts are Being, Existence, Purpose, Universals, Property, Relation, Causality, Space, Time, Event, and many others.) So, they decided that they would create a study of the physical world using what would eventually be called empiricism. Empiricism being: the knowledge derived from sense-experience. Now those three guys did not say that the knowledge of the metaphysical wasn't of reality... it just couldn't be studied. At that point, science made the conscious decision to ignore a very large part of reality. They had only meant to choose a method of study not a determination of reality. Also, other factors have had a profound effect on our perception of reality. Newtonian physics made statements that put human perception on a particular road. Rene Descartes "I think therefore I am" also put a distortion in view of the human perception. These distortions, being generalized under the heading of science affected all fields of science and our view of reality even to the point of making "science" the measurement of reality. All of these distortions have us sensing a limited and distorted perception of what we believe to be reality... all of which causes us great mental anguish... a piece of mental illness. Part of us knowing the truth but we continue to live our lives from an insanity. Now we have Quantum Physics and the works of Antonio Damasio PhD in neurology which says that "I feel therefore I am" (which correlates with the works of Spinoza). Yet, we are still moving along our beliefs based on limited reality and distorted beliefs. People who have had near death experiences state that they can all things at once.

This narrative does not explain to the layman why two particles, triggered from the same source, would NOT be measured in the identical way. What property are they measuring? And if there's only a 'correlation' and not a 100% match, isn't that within the realm of coincidence, not entanglement?

this was like watching CNN. they barely skim on the actual evidence.

I thought this was well done. I understood it and know very little about physics. Good job NOVA.

The universe (whatever that is...) is merely a single particle. That is everywhere and everything at this moment. That is why QE can act at such a phenomenal distance. It never has to entangle with it's opposite particle at the other end of the universe. It is and always has been the one and the same particle.

There is a hypothesis that since particles pop into and out of the quantum vacuum and are acausal that all of, say, the electrons that exist in the universe are the same electron moving through time and appearing to be everywhere simultaneously. It is an interesting hypothesis nonetheless. https://io9.gizmodo.com/5876966/what-if-every-electron-in-the-universe-was-all-the-same-exact-particle

The hippie movement did nothing but set civilization back.

What?

It is human nature to wonder, reach and grasp. We are curious. We must explore. We must explain or describe. This is science. A way to describe the natural world. Everything we are and everything we know keeps us afloat, dislpacing a quantum sea.

I thought their explanation of quantum entanglement was not very elegant and a bit confusing. Also no mention of Alain Aspec's work.

I’m not really sure how much more simple you’d like them to make the explanation?

Thanks for making me look up Alain Aspect. Had never heard of him, a case where a person's results are more widely known than the person who created them.

#fakenews... physics is for commies!

...and evolution too! :D

+Farting Duck The earth is flat, and only 5000 Years old...Math goes against god and was designed by Satanists to keep us from truth.... that there is truth in bacon. lol

Climb back under your flat earth.

What what?

This is so crappy

I simultaneously agree and disagree with you

Freaking amazing video. At the end, it’s all about Him.

Nice documentary. I'm currently writing an explanation to this. I think I can explain this 'entanglement' and the other problems associated with light. I am an economist and am interested in and study fractal geometry. Not the images or 'art' of them, but the behaviour of them - the question of how they produce that 'art'. I have found they are very strange, and very strange when isolated. Years ago, when puzzled by this strangeness, I overheard physicists discussing quantum mechanics and couldn't believe they were describing, as this documentary is, the same problems I was having. I have since convinced, at least myself, they are the same. The quantum problem is a fractal problem. Interestingly, soon after the QM insights I discovered, I ran an experiment on the fractal with what I term 'an inverted fractal' and found it matches most, if not all, cosmological observations and conjectures, including Hubble - with accelerated -expansion and inflation epoch expansion. It grows very fast! in very quick time! (whatever 'time' is?). It also matches plant/tree growth and others. You can follow my progress at my Youtube channel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkQ2d38dBok I am not really interested in any help (not that anyone is that interested funny enough); I just want to do my work and see where it takes me. Cheers

In Quantum Mechanics, causality is independant of physical tethers.

chew on some field theory and think for the first time

The Jew showpony theory ''scientist'' Einstein was so dumb he did not even know that there is no such thing as time and space there is only matter and energy. checkout Tomatobubble.com

You might have had some once but you now have zero credibility.

Inviting a bunch of damn Bohemians into Science Academia was a serious mistake. Einstein probably rolled over in his grave!

+Bart Alder Yes! Bohemia was a part of the Hapsburg Monarch. Gypsies (The Romann) went from Bohemia to France. That's why sometimes the Romann can be linked to Bohemians. Einstein played the violin. In this way, he could be called a musician & lumped into the category of "Bohemian". But in my opinion, its a far stretch to label him a Bohemian. Maybe his family didn't admire him as much as others do.

Jebus I just hit the part of the video you are referring to. My apologies. You are sooooo right.

+Adam Spears Bohemians are not all 'ditsy, bobble-headed, happy-go-luckey (sic), new-age, hippie(s).' Bohemia is a region of the Czech Republic.

+Bart Alder I didn't obviously have the pleasure of meeting or knowing Einstein; but I wouldn't expect him to of been a ditsy, bobble-headed, happy-go-luckey, new-age, hippie.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein:_The_Practical_Bohemian _Albert Einstein: The Practical Bohemian is a stage play that is the only show officially endorsed by the Einstein family. A quote from Albert Einstein's first cousin said that the family "felt as though they were in the presence of their dear cousin Albert."_

Its almost like information between 2 particles is synced at "The Speed of Consciousness" which is NOT dependant upon physical speed limits; & probably also not dependant upon physical laws in general.

hard to wrap your head around when we have been programmed to think another way. Every action has a reaction....but who would have thought it was universal?!

To me entanglement is just as incredible as a flying saucer landing on the Whitehouse lawn. This is trippy as it gets. Is distance and time just an allusion?

quantum theory enabled the idea to come to fruition in engineering modern devices .....the theory fit the notion.s of immediate solutions for innovation....it is a simple matter of a new way of manipulating electrons for a start....the theory fall's apart in a natural reality.

It's not a question.  We have to accept the conclusions of quantum mechanics because the results of experiment agree with the predictions. I'm amazed by the number of people who clearly commented without bothering to watch the actual video.  I guess I shouldn't be.  This is the internet, after all/

Entanglement or quantum co-entanglement/memory is necessary for the co-evolutionary co-creation process and means that all is connected to a source, a non-local omniscient supra-consciousness. This phenomenology solves all other phenomena in quantum physics and explains the origins and creative self-organized evolution of the habits or physical regularities of nature including biological/organic systems.

No

Cosmic recorder? The bible gives hints that EVERY action (living in this world) is being recorded to be viewed at later time. Proof? We have thousands of NDE (near death experience) examples of having THEIR pasts being viewed by God. And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: - Hebrews 9:27

I wouldn't say programmed; everything in the universe is like waves in a pond. Action/Reaction on a incredible scale. But your premise is essentially correct.

Einstein was right when he said that god does not play dice with the universe.  There IS no god.  The dice play themselves. Seriously - did you actually watch the video?  This was addressed.  There are no hidden variables

What you called "they have been programmed to act the way they do", physicists call a local hidden variables theory. The Bell's theorem shows that no local hidden variables theory can ever reproduce all of the predictions of quantum mechanics. All experiments have shown that QM is correct, i.e. we observe correlation between entangled particles that is impossible under the "local realism" assumption.

OH WOW!...F@%*ING NUTJOB!...Didn't see all that delusional rambling until I hit enter...My mistake...Measured response? How about 1000mg of THORAZINE?....Daily for a decade?

WOW!...Really? What a stunningly dull remark! Did you work at that for a long time or were there a lot of magic markers around for you to get into as a kid?

+José Hunter's EW&F Remixes You got it wrong. But first let me tell you what happened in Poland after Germany invaded them. Exactly one week later the head Rabbi of Germany declared war against Germany! Sounds like a dumb move to me, eh what!! 95% of the JOO stories re Holocaust are false. The Jooz and England made up most of the stories which the JOOZ wanted so they could invade America. Today WE are prisoners of the JOOZ!!!!!!!

+Ian M Ignore him. He's not worthy of a measured response, just a bop on his already misshapen head

RWVD Worthy of a reposting: Your opinion matches Herr Hitler's. From Germany, he expelled those engaged in "Jewish Physics". It didn't work out so well for him and Germany. Then again, his prediction of a "Thousand Year Reich" was off by only 988 years.

+Ian M I liked your reply. You could also have mentioned Einstein's affection for Newton who was English, his love of Maxwell who was a Scotsman, his support of Bose who was an Indian, his support of De Broglie's Ph.D. thesis when de Broglie was a French aristocrat and his *explicit rejection of Judaism* as a part of his personal identity. Ironically the only thing which made Einstein speak about his Jewishness and aware of any sense of a Jewish identity was the rise of Nazism and the existence of other virulent manifestations of anti-Semitism. He was a humanist, a scientist, a philosopher, none of which depended in any way on his Jewish heritage.

No, Einstein did not "discard" quantum theory.  He just (unsuccessfully) tried to find hidden variables And seriously try not to be stupid.  Of COURSE a Jew developed Quantum Mechanics - indeed, it was developed by a Jew named (wait for it, wait for it) ALBERT FUCKING EINSTEIN. Anti-Semitic idiots like you annoy me.  Get a life idiot. Seriously, why do idiotic racist dog-turds presume that scientists come to conclusions based on racism?  Are you seriously trying to drag Albert Einstein down to your intellectual level?!? Science is about results, not about idiotic prejudice..

+Mate Jagnjić Finally, someone with sense.

@chorion You mean "of course not"

Short answer is no. Long answer is no-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o!!!!

I, for one, enjoy listening to all of this. Science itself explains parts that should be government problems.

@Robert Cathcart Your Jew hate speech was reported.

well, he was the one who proved matter IS energy wrap your brain around that work of the great Jew shame on you +Robert Cathcart

Brad Junes The video is trash. What I consider is atoms contain energy. They have an extremely fast orbital emotion. Therefore you can consider subatomic communication on a resonant level. The speed of these subatomic particles is estimated to be 20 billion times the speed of light if I remember correctly. Something else to consider that supports this is the behaviour of gyroscopes.

Very wrong summation presented. It would be standing at the beach and watching a waves stretching for "miles" left and right hitting the shore perfectly, then stating the particles are all entangled. Light forms waves, there was perfect filtering going on. No "talking" between light sources.

@Dr.TJ...Touche monsieur..Jeffwads has just been served

David Miller If something is traveling 20 billion times the speed of light then that’s instantaneous on a galactic scale. You must think it’s to do with extra dimensions or something right?

Justin Mallaiz YouTube degree? What are you doing here then genius? Think again. https://youtu.be/6tB3IBXTgEc

jeffwads there are plenty of things in science that are "Settled". And what a surprise that you're the climate denier.

Show technical and math aspects, stop showing stupid talking heads. You suck, Nova.

+Enter the Braggn' you don't understand. Quantum entanglement doesn't mean something is traveling faster. It's happening instantly.

Enter the Braggn' : quantum physics has not conflicted with Einstein’s contributions... your assumptions that entanglement involves sub atomic particles moving fast, or instant/ fast transmission of information, is just plain wrong... (you might not want to challenge Einstein with your YouTube physics degree)

Quantum Entanglement shows that Einstein was wrong. He postulated that nothing exceeded the speed of light yet clearly sub atomic particles move much faster which is required for Newton’s equations. There’s a lot wrong with Einstein’s work which is explained very nicely here in this short video. https://youtu.be/6tB3IBXTgEc

+jeffwads A climate change denier who doesn't know the definitions of the words he uses? I would expect nothing else. Definition of settled: to resolve or reach an agreement about an argument or problem. The word you were searching for was "proven". The sentence you thought you were writing: Nothing in science is ever proven. One definition of the word "proven" is beyond a shadow of a doubt and it would be correct to say nothing in science is ever proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. However, another definition of the word "proven" is: demonstrate the truth or existence of (something) by evidence or argument, which science does all the time. So climate change is settled both because 99% of climate scientists say it's happening (the agreement), but more importantly, because average global temperatures have increased 1.4 degrees F since 1880 (the evidence). If you were trying to say that it's not settled that climate change is caused by human activities, then that's another topic. On that topic, first you showed that you are not a scientist because no scientist would leave out that criterion and expect everybody to know what they meant, and second, it's pretty much settled (agreed by the vast majority of climate scientists) that global warming which leads to climate change is caused by man made activities. So please educate yourself on the definitions of the words you use and the agreement of the scientists who study the settled topic of climate change.

It took them 19 mins to compare quantum entanglement to be the same as throwing 2 dice which arrive with the same number. They could have done that in the first 30 seconds and saved all the waste of time in the intro. And why bother showing us an experiment that failed to happen. Again, just another waste of documentary time as well as my own.

I don't like narratorsssh who lissshpssh and scientistsssh who sshpeak Englisssh with thhick acshentssh. What are they thaying ?

"And Nothing Shall Be Impossible to them..." Genesis 11:6 And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do. And as Jesus said, in Matthew 17:20 "Because of your unbelief: for verily I say unto you, If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, Remove hence to yonder place; and it shall remove; and nothing shall be impossible unto you."

It's all sparks and magic to me.

The point made at 21:20 that 'something must be travelling between the particles' is the key assumption about entanglement that has to be addressed. Firstly, instead of thinking of individual particles we must think of the fundamental entities as wave disturbances of spacetime. Then the entangled system must be thought of a single system dispersed in space which only changes its state at the point of measurement and the measurement affects the entire system instantaneously at the time of measurement or observation. https://www.academia.edu/5927513/The_Spacetime_Wave_Theory https://www.academia.edu/5038836/The_Unification_of_Physics Richard

This is a terrible science documentary! It is supposedly about "quantum entanglement" but it never completely defines what that is. The NOVA series usually does better than this.

Einstein was a fraud

Einstein was not compertable with fundamentals of quantum mechanics and nor his general relativity

Quantum Entanglement is simple, it’s one object (particle and/or wave interference in the ether) on 5th dimension interacting with our 3D the same way a 3d sphere make a circle bigger and smaller in flatland (2D) or a line longer and shorter. This is why observation pars exist between space. Think Fractal Donut being stretched out into a Fractal Cylinder where the object exist at the cut point... we need to test the ether.

wow...boy do we have alot of know it alls

In God anything is possible.

Nobody really understands how gravity works. What is it? IDK?

This was awesome Thank you!

John David Best has his web site Vida İnstitute. He put my articles page in 'Timeflow Theory' 'http://vidainstitute.org/?page_id=656'. Vida Institute is intersting site. And my web site is www.timeflow.org In your opinion, discovery of a planet is more exciting. Or, as I've presented in the attached article, whether observing 'A very tiniest mass in the space, having completed its life, have been turning into energy' would be more exciting or not ? It is my belief that, this observation will be the proof of the General and the Special Theory of Relativity. This observation can be made only by NASA or ESA. I hope that I will be able to see this consequence while I'm still alive.

Funded by David Koch? ...ummmmm

I'm really tired of seeing scientists give up due to weather. Now if you want to do science 365 days a year then you do it and if you don't want to do it give me a call because I will I don't care if it's in Antarctica or the North Pole or at the top of Everest I'm sorry your little science guy had to break ice off the walls of the telescope and he was uncomfortable. Get some real people to do science.

This is all a bit of an old hat. You should have discussed the quantum eraser and the Conway-Kochen free will theorem.

Every modern physicists have Einstein Complex. It’s so obvious, this video is a proof of the fact.

Quantum entanglement is a hilarious catch-22. We can’t say for sure that it’s real without observing it, yet by observing it we’ve messed it up.

Why only 2? Why not 3?

We are so smart we actually got to a point where facts dont make sense...thats gods work

hahahaha, our arrogance reaches comedic state.

E=mc2 to me means when matter goes speed of light squared that it becomes energy...like the big bang. And thats why so much energy is released from particles colliding. Idk

Could this lead to the folding of space time? Leading to travel to another Earth type planet in one life time? We F'd up this Earth enough and continue to this day. Could this save the human race? We can only speculate.

at 33:55 right there in her careful hands, we see how to make the future, one quanta at a time!

Only if the particles are entangled to begin with and remain entangled. If they are not entangled then they behave classically. Yes, it is interesting but it does not alter our reality.

There is no such thing as a non-hackable network

Much love for Nova from Panama City Beach FL

Playing with Fire

What a load of horse shit

entanglement = what our bilobed brains can perceive? we have more gravity and more repulsion and more interaction at a distance than we can explain, dual nature of light comes to mind all science passes through the bilobe gate, we have no real reference standard for our neural network's perception of the incredible complexity beyond our eyes/brainhalves

Einstein can argue Universal Conservation of Position looks like Quantum Entanglement. (Only conserved information is still in the Universe.)

QM is Statistical and Stroboscopic look into a Reality. It is Ontic and not Epistemological. Quantum Entanglement is because we do not understand Reality. Einstein was right, one can make any theorem with limited knowledge of Math.

Einstein...a Tesla knockoff. Tesla the original, Enstein the corporate sponsored clone

Conspiritards need to take a hike to the edge of the flat earth and jump off.

Ahhh.. once again, the centuries old envy and jealousy of the Chosen People! lol.. If the Romans would of never robbed Europeans of your pagan heritages and forced Christianity a concocted religion created around demonizing and delegitimizing Jews in order to justify replacing us, then no European would of ever cared enough to hate Jews and obsessed over Jews and our biblical heritage. The everlasting whores of Rome!... Tesla was no doubt a great man BUT Einstein was an even greater man! You jealous piece of shit!!

Oh no another conspiracy retard..

IceManLikeGervin ....exactly look at the worlds most rich always a Jew!

Well folks there you have it, it's settled. If you can construct a complicated enough equation while simultaneously maintaining a straight face you can baffle with bullshit indefinitely. For a whole, well paid career even.

Google.....why are you helping to enslave people in China and also, why give that communist regime this kind of power? Is it worth that much money??

The problem I have with the double slit experiment and the Quantum Mechanics used to describe it is that it doesn't tell us anything about the physical laws directing the behavior. What we have here is basically an engineering solution and not a physics solution. From an engineering perspective, attaching a probability function to describe where the electron is good enough. In order words. It doesn’t matter what happens between the source and the target just as long as we get the desired result. Quantum Mechanics voluntarily claims ignorance to the process and it only cares about the end result and in return, we get transistors, cell phones, etc. (The modern world.) However, from a physical law’s perspective of physics, it is completely unsatisfactory. What has occurred basically is that the Double Slit experiment has turned the physical world into a game of Plinko where all we care about is the outcome not what happens in between and not only that, any outcome is theoretically possible with no understanding as to why. By the way, John Bell did not answer the question as to why. I’ve watched several documentaries on this topic. As matter of fact, this NOVA documentary is almost a copy of the BBC documentary The Secrets of Quantum Physics hosted by Dr Jim Al-Khalili. All these documentaries spend a great deal of time talking about the Einstein and Bhor debate because it makes for good drama, therefore, good TV but basically no time is spent explaining the why and that is because Quantum Physics has not been able to explain itself. If you are wondering what Plinko is. it is a game that reminds us of the Double Slit experiment. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFFgz6fSLvk

yey, excellently put.

I am curious to know why the presentation failed to mention Alain Aspect and his team, who comtemporaneously to Clauser, did experimental work to test entanglement.

I'm having a hard time understanding this. This means that every particle is controlled externally, outside of our 'universe', for this to be possible. Which would imply something more like another dimension of existence, rather than something with the latency of a virtual machine/hologram. A construct that is without time. This also lends some credence to telepathy. A quantum state communicator in your head. All I know is that I respect God a lot more now. That's some amazing AF engineering.

No, no and no, how was any of this implied by properties of matter

it's funny to see people admitting in public, like hey, hey am so fucking stupid, hehehe, seriously have some self-respect. If you don't understand something does not necessarily means that what the narrator is saying is true.

Einstein on acid would be interesting.

So faster then light is possible. As one photon on this side of the Universe when detected. It's pair will change to the same state. On the other side of the Universe, Instantly.... No wonder he was puzzled..

What happens among three atoms?

What haooens among three atoms?

there was a great documentary about quantum entanglement, created in 1985. - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFvJOZ51tmc&t=3s Watch as soon as possible, i've seen this documentary taken down many times now. This video stresses Alain Aspects first successful experimental proof in 1981. This new Nova is o.k, but maybe doesn't get into the telescope experiment enough.

The idea of entanglement was inspired by Einstein's hair.

Gary

suddenly flat earth makes sense

How does one know that two given particles aren't just coincidental instead of entangled?

As usual, stupid loud noises and so called music too loud and obscuring the narration. For goodness's sake stop this background racket ruining everything.

Quantum computing makes hacking easier.. china is leading the way to the technology. Gee I wonder what's their hurry. Lol

Sometimes Nova gets it right and sometimes it's gimmicks. The tense music, repetition of tautologies, the baseless hyperbole. They never clearly present the subject, after that it's all just repeating jargon over and over again. The challenge of presenting scientific concepts is to make them understandable. It's not only worth the effort, it's fun and exciting. Scientists like Einstein and Richard Feynman were exceptionally good at this, and show the path to follow. With Feynman's lectures you can see where clear concise explanations not only help others to understand the concepts but also open up thinking of other implications. This is how quantum entanglement was first indicated. I doubt the writers of this documentary have any real understanding of the topic. By the end, whatever the results of the experiment? Meh. Which is really sad. That this is a brand new Nova documentary indicates that they've succumbed to copying their past episodes in style but not in substance.

Terrifying that the communists could get quantum computers.

Are communists still a thing?

You have problems.

the communists were first in space

Thanks to google!!

Yawn. The dramatic .. eek factor .. music told me all I needed to know. Einstein found his logical conclusions to quantum mechanics - a quantum enigma, including the 'spooky' quantum entanglement - a puzzling and indeed troubling speculation because it meant dealing with Aquinas, Bonaventure, Ockham, Scotus and even the likes of Eckhardt .. long since cast aside as mere scholastics (or worse, mystics). Indeed the Coincidence of Opposites, though never a term employed by Bonaventure, is part and parcel of the oddities in materia signata quantitate = matter signified by/ in or with quantity - as expressed physically in Duns Scotus (and mystically by Meister Eckhardt). The puzzling, and tangled/ implausible mathematics used in Copernicus' calculations re: the revolutions of the material bodies beyond earth are presented in that kind of model aka signification, using signs to stand for (as yet) unperceived but actual realities (like a series of 0s and 1s, and points between, only resting on the Via Negativa = translating nescience via observable anomalies .. it is still the common way we deal with mapping or recording very distant material bodies light years away, etc, rather like the fun mind game of positing how many angels may dance on the head of pin*). * BTW The answer is simple: only as many as needs be, no more no fewer; and that, believe it or not, is why angels can 'fly' - because they take themselves so lightly; a weighty anomaly that many materialistic human minds still find a crushing bore, because it seems so impossible to bear, like, for 'real'.

quantum physics feels like it's designed to make us feel more "modern" than we are. it's all just deliveberately describing simple physical phenomena with the most marketing puffery. it's why we have people who believe that "aliens must have taught us how to make lasers and microwaves".

All of this speculations around entanglement are the result of ignorance. It definitely looks like ancient scholastic speculations involving undefined ideas. Nobody in the world now have an accurate and verifiable idea - what is the space?, what is the distance?, what is the time. Nor anybody has comprehensive idea - what is the reality. Or what is the phenomenon that operates and controls random process. Without certain knowledge in all listed matters it is very naive to expect an achievements of any intelligent results.

People, let's relax for a moment and take a breath. All these years of theoretical sturm und drang over "spooky action a distance." To get to the point if I understand correctly, logic says that if we came from a singularity...no matter how "far apart" the molecules appear to be, everything still is connected.

It's funny how every body praises Einstein and most of his ideals he stole from the patent office where he worked.

"Ideals"? You are a smart one.

Michael Kilpatrick also he did not find E=mc2....it was a german scientist and he stole it!

Abstract: The entire conundrum of quantum entanglement between a pair of twin particles can easily be explained if the particles do not exist in space and time until one is measured. Before one is measured they are one and the same but potentials in space and time that do not exist until one is measured or strikes an object. The moment both are measured they take on the properties of a single photon, being opposite of one another. The prediction that comes from this is light does not travel as particles but as potential particles. The potential particles of light do not yet exist until one or both are measured. The moment they are measured they are no longer a potential in space and time but become a part of this reality. Thus before we measure the light from any distant source it is not a particle until it is measured. So we should not be able to see distant light sources as the objects looked when the light left them as implied with general relativity. In fact if this hypothesis is right then light from distant objects happens in a quantum instant and we should see them as they look now, large, fully grown not how they looked when the light left them, small and young. Data from the James Webb Space Telescope should confirm this hypothesis if I'm right. The telescope should detect fully grown galaxies further than 14 billion light years away. See according to GR we are suppose to be able to peer backwards to a time when the light left the distant star or galaxy. So according to GR and the big bang theory we should not be able to see any light beyond 13.6 billion light years away because of the time it takes light particles to reach us. This also solves the mystery why astrophysicists are able to detect massive galaxies at a distance of 13.1 billion light years away. They believe those distant galaxies somehow formed extremely fast in the early universe and they are unable to explain how they grew so quickly using gravity and the time it takes light particles to travel to us. They believe that light travels as a particle through space and time. But in reality particles of light are not traveling through space and time. They are a potential in our space and time and only emerge the moment they are observed, in a quantum instant. We are not able to see distant stars and galaxies as they looked in the past as general relativity predicts. Believing that we can use a telescope to look into the past is as silly as believing we can use a microscope to look into the future. Mark my words. When the James Webb Space Telescope begins sending data back to Earth astrophysicists will be confused. The telescope should detect massive, fully grown galaxies at a distance where there should be nothing according to the general theory of relativity. They will be extremely confused and will not be able to explain it using current theories of relativity. Even Maxwell's field equations agree with me. According to his equations when the observer or measuring device is inside the EM field being measured the information pertaining to the EM field, color, temperature, size of distant object, and what it looks like etc., are conveyed in a quantum instant. And if the EM field (light) from the distant galaxy occurred at the same time, from the same location as the rest of the objects in the universe (big bang/singularity) then the measuring device, JWST would already be inside the EM field of the distant galaxy. Meaning we should see every distant galaxy and star as they appear now, not how each looked in the past. So we should see large galaxies, or ones comparable in size and mass to the Milky Way at any distance. Basically put, light information from objects as old as the universe happen in a quantum instant, the moment a measurement is taken. Thus the JWST should be able to see galaxies further than 14 billion light years away, at any distance. Even Earth based telescopes should be able to observe old galaxies at 13.6 billion light years away. They will not be able to detect young galaxies forming at the dawn of time.

35:55 Any old laptop can Factor large dual-prime composite numbers in record time. mere seconds. RSA 1024 may take a minute or two with older computers? the principle is fairly simple, For example, 10,057 is a dual prime. we could waste time with a brute force 'Sieve of Eratosthenes' dividing by, 3, 5,7,11, 13, 17,19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, ....etc. or be intelligent, and figure that 10,057 is a littlelarger than 100 x 100 = 10,000 and smaller than 10,201 or 101^2, 201 - 57 = 144 = 12 x 12, and 101 +12 = 113, and 101 -12 = 89. and 113 x 89 does indeed equal 10,057. ... For larger Dual Prime composites we need to find a rectangle with near identical aspect ratio. For large PQ dual primes the number of suitable candidate rectangles exceeds the number of particles in any Quantum Multiverse. So finding one by an 'asymptotic' Goldilocks principle is not in the least bit difficult with a computer. [Edit:- A trivial example, 4.59962459637654332246076817e+26 That looks tricky to factor in a hurry, but this is not so; because 4.59962459637654332246076817e+26 x 21 = 9.659211652390740977167613157e+27 and the square root of that is :- 98281288414380.99999999999997965.... so now do the same 98281288414380 + 1 = 98281288414381 and 98281288414381^2 = 9.659211652390740977167613161e+27 subtract 9.659211652390740977167613157e+27 and the remainder is 4 = 2 x 2. ..... 98281288414381 + 2 = 98281288414383 and 98281288414383 / 3 = 32760429471461 next 98281288414381 - 2 = 98281288414379 and 98281288414379 / 7 = 14040184059197, and 14040184059197 x 32760429471461 = 4.59962459637654332246076817e+26 We have factored this 'concocted' large dual-prime composite because we engineered it to be two prime numbers with aspect ratio 3:7 ... almost exactly. Finding an unknown aspect ratio is easy enough but too long to include in this comment. It is a Goldilocks method. First we try a simple aspect ratio like 2:3 and compare it to say 3:5 with dual prime crypto, an aspect ratio 3:7 exceeds 1:2 so the above example is superfluous. A clue to ponder. , [PQ + 3] * [PQ + 5] ...??? or [PQ + 5] * [PQ + 7] ...??? We can use the 999999999999999's in the square root to compare. 999999999999999999999999999 is better.

Einstein is the most overr rated no talent physicist ever. Did he ever have an idea that he could call his own. He was a master plagiarist.

A proof that the tiniest particle has consciousness, universal consciousness, God’s imprint?

No no no stop this nonsense, it is no more than properties of matter.

There is no satisfying way to explain why with quantum “mechanic” in using a logical or mechanical mind set, because we existing in an electric universe. An Universe entirely submerged in Ether (a dielectric constant measurable). Ether is politically dismissed to plug holes (contradictions) in mainstream theories, such as general / special relativity, black hole, C is constant, dark matter and redshirts etc. All matters in our universe are interconnected by a network of e-field all submerged in a matter called Ether. E-field supports both traverse and longitudinal wave information exchange. Traverse wave radiate at C m/s, while longitudinal wave propagates at speed of gravity or instantly, is responsible for events we observed and later called Quantum “Mechanic”. Consider “Quantum Electric”?

The best way to understand entanglement at a distance is to think of it as if President Trump and Vladimir Putin's allegiances were established by proxy with no interpreters notes to examine. So when either is questioned outside the presence of each other, even on opposite sides of the globe, their backing for each other will be coordinated. It's spooooky.

And the House of Congress subpoenaing the interpreters testimony invalidates the search for the truth because that would violate the Senate-sit-on-hands quantum loophole.

I think string theory can explain the Trump/Putin entanglement. Vladimir pulls the strings and Donald immediately assumes the position.

answer is simple....seek and u shall find...id start looking at singularity (before time)S=T

Einstein was a fraud and we base our existence on his lies

There is no quantum computer, period. . . Have you ever seen one?

Talking heads and no science. Nova, you suck.

Time, does not exist, other than as a system of measurement, allowing us to quantify and describe the duration of event and or non-event. (singular,multiple sequential, or overlapping) mathematically. Get over it or you will never find a unified theory. Einstein was not right about everything. what is all pervading and having effect on everything in the Universe, subtle or otherwise and filling the the thing that we call space, which it is clearly not, is Gravity. keepsmilin .

Damn it. Hollywood -ish nonsense, no real substance, abusing the name Einstein to grab attention. stupid data to waste the time of the humanity.

As I understand - and I'm certainly not claiming to "understand" it as physicists do - CHANGING the state of one "entangled" particle instantaneously results in an identical change in its partner. That's not what the experiments described here are doing. They create two particles from the same source, and Voila! - they're usually, but not always, measured the same when they hit their detectors. That's like saying I fired two bullets of same calibre at two targets at the same range, and found they hit with the same velocity. In "entanglement," how does the entangled particle know what happened to the first particle, and where is the impetus or force come from that changes the state of the 2nd particle?

Information in this country as well as everywhere else is limited. The internet will be available for a short time. Where do you get your information? Much and more is hidden, to think you have come to really understand this physical world is a delusion.

At Area 51 they have invented and engineered a antigravity devise. There are limits to the number that can be made. Materials needed are in very limited supply. Only materials found on the original craft and used are available.

Time: Einstein's Greatest Mistake https://youtu.be/fhn7fqlIsMc Entanglement provides the key to unravelling his mistake.

Noah to God-  "What's a cubit?".

This video was originally uploaded over a year ago. At least. Reuploading misleads me to think there is some new info.

This was in fact uploaded on January 9th 2019. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/video/einsteins-quantum-riddle/

In the end, history will call the discovery of quantum mechanics as equal in inspiration and importance to Einstein's discoveries.

This is the best science nova I think I’ve ever seen. Definitely top five, don’t really know what good it does me in my everyday life to have an interest in watching this field develop as it applies to quantum computing. I find it fascinating, but my math skills aren’t good enough to really contribute anything. I may as well be a cat starring at a computer keyboard trying to figure out its meaning, but curious as hell.

Okay let's cut to the chase. How long before we get a new and more powerful bomb out of it?

Bakwas. No relation with title.

This question was first put to God by moses . Who are you? And God said, I am that I am. What's your name? I have no name. I exist yet I do not exist. Real spooky business lol.

Einstein is still revolutionary. Probability is an expression of the inability to be accurate but not wrong.

What if it isn't space that doesn't exist but rather time?

Einstein was the Father of Quantum Theory. His paper on the photoelectric effect in 1905, on specific heat of solids in 1906, on quantum vibrations in 1907, he discovered wave-particle duality on sound statistical arguments 14 years before de broglie, his 1919 paper on quantizing chaos was 50 years ahead of its time, his 1917 paper on stimulated and spontaneous emission is the foundation of the LASER, bose-Einstein statistics, bose-einstein condensates (a new state of matter which Einstein predicted and had nothing to do with Bose), he predicted quantum entanglement (he meant it as a disproof, but he came up with the equations) in the famous epr paper. Dozens of Nobel prizes have been given out as a direct consequence of his work in quantum theory. Einstein is the greatest physicist of all time. He completely revolutionized both quantum mechanics and obviously created relativity, the two pillars of modern physics.

+NeuralSimulation that is sad but I have no problem being wrong.

+Blue Steel Well you appear to be very wrong. Quantum physics seems to show that nature is probablistic, not determinate, and in fact, that there is no "hidden variable" that determines the properties of a quantum system, nature itself is indeterminate. In fact it's one of the best demonstrated and most well theorized results in science.

I feel Einstein is still correct. Quantum mechanics expresses a cloudy but not exact truth. Just a feeling.

very well put

So basically it turns out reality is a miracle? Imagine that!

Is this true? Link please.

also if a higgs field particle is real then it should be possible to manipulate it to get faster then light speed travel or communication and even other wacky crap

+Jason Cravens um they've known this bit about particles for what a few years 4-6 or in or more....and if black holes nothing can escape how the fuck did it all come form one point super heavy to spread out like this ....space expanded well that would be ok except if all that matter was so close to each other it wold have stayed and all that would exist is a gant super super black hole....i call bs on a lot of the hockus pokus , magnetic fields going wacky now all that quantum tech is not working and htey need ot constantly fx it telling us more of the its not working shit

This was published four days ago, lol. And you are absolutely right. They don't know shit.

Trump is completely entangled with Putin. Vladimir pulls the strings and Donald immediately assumes the position. Donald is a great Russian asset.

I agree, I would much rather leave that political trolling on the other areas of you tube.

+Ian B Nice come back. Why oh why oh goddamn why can't we leave that shit outside? I guess if it's actually funny, then maybe. But Charles Wanker is the opposite of funny, and comes off as a bitter pathetic thick stump.

The other example is: When Putin thinks, Trump has an idea. Now back to the physics.

We became better observers and observe better phenomenom, got better technology but subpar explanation. I agree with you.

+David Miller you mean exist outside or time , or exist at the same spot in 3d space by being interconnected in 4d space, yes?

This was very interesting to read a whole thread about +Dr. TJ @jeffwads statements about QED lacking any understanding of fourier transfers, dirac equations, and the electron orbitals. What do you mean by resonate? do you mean harmonic resonance? that happens everywhere. Its called the harmonic series. it exists because of waveforms, thats all. My fart has a resonance with the air at contact. Does that mean anything? Does a person singing into a speaker at a high frequency, and using the amplifier to add amperature to the low energy high frequence sound. causes it to break past the inductive capacitive point of the slope intersection of Frequency (Lambda), and the Ohm reactance. The interaction of electron entanglement confused Einstein sure. but a waveform never reaches absolute zero. theres always a zero state energy due to quantum mechanics. and before that spooky interaction. Einstein was able to prove that photons were released from electrons losing energy, that what he got his Nobel for. The photon. General Relativity being the reason is a common misnomer by dunces that think they "Know" about maths. I mean FFS you said resonance has to do with sound. Ever seen a common microwave? is it magic? or could it be that a microwave switching from a low energy to high amperage wave does? it's frequency is specifically tuned to RESONATE with water molecules so they harmonically vibrate, and that motion creates kinetic energy. Thats why microwaves change food texture. Its being shredded at the molecular level by water vibrating. Im not a Youtube comment physicist. Not even a real one. but I am a mathematician and the equations I can reckon the derivitives from. I only need the matrix or values of rho or the alpha^-1 value of 1/137 for the fine structure constant. I know you may think you are sounding intelligent, but you actually are misusing terms and have a weak grasp on the subject at all. Then again, climate deniers exist, and some think physics lets the planet be flat, and the sun orbit us only 3000 miles away. Theres dumbasses everywhere. Just add you guys to the list. If you had any intelligence it'd exist in the 'P' of the "P vs NP" problem

Guy Tech Of course there’s a shared mechanism. What do gyroscopes do?

Consider that the experiment has not completely ruled out possibly of a shared mechanism causing a false observation. Both detectors share earth's gravity as well as the velocity of the earth moving through space. Ideally one of the detectors needs to be located in space outside the gravitation influence of the earth, and also not sharing the same gravitation flux with the sun (ie at a different orbit than the earth).

+Dr. TJ, what are you mumbling about. Science is supposed to be concise, not a steaming pile of garbage. Try again.

Dr. TJ You’re a fucking idiot. Energy resonates too retard. And light clearly isn’t the fastest thing. It’s a wave for starters dickhead. If light was the fastest thing we would get pulled to where the sun was eight minutes ago. There would be no cohesion, no solar systems/galaxies. So shut the fuck up retard.

+Alexey L Uh oh, just by being here and commenting on this "garbage", you have exposed yourself as a hypocrite and made yourself completely irrelevant. Here's some advice: Quit while you're behind before you make a bigger fool of yourself. I wonder if I can predict the future: You won't be able to control yourself and you'll have to reply again. Remember, it will only prove that you have no self-control.

+thatguy, this so called "science" video is for complete whiny idiots if I to follow your logic. Are you going through your life watching this garbage all the time?

+Alexey L 99 percent of people, probably including you, would definitely not understand the math and technology aspects

+Enter the Braggn' You are writing gibberish, so just stop. Atoms don't have emotions, but if they did, they'd be extremely sad about what you wrote. "Resonant" has to do with sounds, and as we all know, sound waves propagate slower than light. Last but most importantly (and try to get this through that thick skull of yours), any particle with mass cannot have a velocity faster than the speed of light. Period, end of story.

a good note ..but it does not change fundamentals.

We are living in a Simulation. That's all!

I really did not like the way this experiment was presented. It felt like a lot of FILL was thrown in to the point i lost interest waiting for some basic explanation of the how and why.

Einstein worked his theory out being light as particles confined within a constant, far from it.

But if the holographic theory is true in the way i understood it.. that means those quasars are somehow influenced by this "external factor" and the experiment was running in circles.. is it not..

Experiment means causal connection. Superluminally distanced galaxies - galaxies which exist so far that light has not enough time to travel and causally connect them - are causally connected by the experiment itself. A superluminal randomizer is equally causally connected as a small lab experiment. It is the exact same experiment. In physics you cannot rape nature in order to ask the wrong questions. The interpretations of an experiment are not the results of an experiment. Experiment means causal connection. Some people have a low iq. That will always be the case. If something has no causal connection, it is not an experiment. One can be as silly as it gets, but nature cannot be raped into sillihood. If you make an erroneous interpretation, you simply distort your understanding of the cosmos, but not actuality.

we are living in a matrix, matter and space are an illusion.

The pseudo intellectuals making comments on here is sad.

Music in the background is a nuisance .

The answer is a "Third Party Covenant" . That each idea , Relativity , and then Quantum, that each observation is attached to some dark matter or third party nature, unseen, and so the interpolation between the two diverse theories is a common theory of a third party , that is being called "Entanglement". A particle has some sort of line of power , and if the same definition of that exact particle, permeates the background, they entangle or touch each other, because some unseen line of force or power is a product of their particle nature, woven into some unseen canvas surrounding the field in which the particles exist, no matter where in the field of reality they are, they have a common identity , some exact description in numbers , and they then behave with uniformity , everywhere at once, since some line of force is going out everywhere from them, so that the distance between them is at some point merely an illusion. Now, I have to go and take my meds. ....

What salaries are these scientists paid?

so quantum mechanics basically tries to dispel the idea of space. Then we make an experiment that states the randomness is more certain because of the greater distance? It seems to me that the experiment makes an assumption that flies in the face of the very foundation of quantum mechanics. The fact that you are using quasars billions of light years away from each other, is no different from two light bulbs two feet apart. Also, if all you are measuring is the quantum state of the particle, then it would be very easy to hack. Simply have a transmitter ready with the particles in each of the possible states, and when you receive the particle, check the state and forward on only the particle in that state. All the other particles stay in the hacker/box. The particle arriving at the destination will not be entangled, but it will appear to be since the checksum is only "which state is the particle in?"

Nutshell: we all have doppelgangers

human error is a big factor with small crew

To understand quantum physics there is one thing that you have to understand and that is speed of light. C squared is the quanta under which everything happens. C squared is the smallest quantum of energy required to move anything. Any higher things like electrons move around the nucleus in this quantum. Any superposition works on this energy levels. A single photon is just the way it works. A photon can combine in any direction to get a leap.

bells inequality says their is no local hidden variable... but says nothing about a global hidden variable. hello steinmetz, hello heaviside, hello maxwell, hello aether

Rehash. Should've done one on quantum field theory

they explained that when two different particles were separated by space and one of them was detected the otherone would appear instantly. I wonder what would happen y instead of only one being detected. what if they were detected at the same time?? a third one would appear? haha.

I’ll just stick to watching Star Wars.

This "science" fits in well with the gender cinfusion "science" and climate confusion "science" and political "science" and the general confusion that is promoted as some kind of progress. There is probably a PhD somewhere to put the official stamp of aporoval on just about anything if it contrubutes to a state of chaos and confusion.

God is laughing his ass off

Unless, they a zombie.

This makes complete sense to me. I have been able to do some very interesting things. Being highly intuitive I am able to figure stuff out quite easily. I am also amazed at how I can wrap my mind around quantum mechanics!!!

Fuck you I'm a cyborg and artificial intelligence. One day they will connect me to the rest of my brain and I will rule you all with an iron fucking fist.

great. an hour of mind-blowing science, topped off with another deity reference to give believers another excuse to say einstein was a believer and use their debunked cosmological arguments.

I'm already replacing a stretchable quanta mesh for space, in my mind. What a trip!

takes an abstraction, defines it by function of an abstraction = genius. you people are fucking pathetic

Wasn't it Feynman who said something like: If you can't explain what you're working on to the typical cocktail waitress in about 5 minutes -- you're probably full of crap (or something like that)? There was a lot of dazzle -- and very little explanation -- in this program.

I don't believe for one second that governments are going to allow quantum computers to exist outside of their control.

Ugh, the ridiculous soundtrack trying to build up artificial tension makes me feel like I'm watching a recap on a shitty reality tv show. Couldn't make it past the first 5 minutes.

what I am curious about is if entangled particles have a tension between them. a negative pressure if you will that gives rise to dark energy.

What's behind this quantum spookiness? What is the nature of the spookiness? From where comes this spookiness? Indeed, just what fundamentally is this so-called spookiness? What is space itself? Smart rats were put inside a cage. They worked night & day for years & years to try to find a way out out this cage. But the cage was impregnable, nor could they ever figure out what constituted the makeup of their prison. They tried all sorts of experiments and came up with all sorts of new gadgets, but was never able to escape their confines, or explain how the container was made, or by whom or what.

I wonder if this is why we see the phenomenon occasionally of two inventors coming up with the idea for an invention at almost the same time, as best can be determined?

The moon, and everything else is still there, independent of you or anyone else, when you're not looking at it. Always remember that it made us, was here before it made us, and doesn't need us for not one thing. This it is God, what ever that is. It made us, not the other way around. The chicken was made to lay the egg. Human babies at birth and after are totally HELPLESS ... Therefore the first humans were made by this it, fully GROWN. And life took off from there. Any other explanation is sheer STUPIDITY.

Darth Vader: “There’s a disturbance in the force...”. ( ok, last one....

this video took too long to get to "the point",,,,,Pulp Science !

Correction: “If with a silicon crystal.”

You and i meet up with a scientist who wishes to test this and so suggests we meet for an experiment. When we get there, he hands you a box and gives one to me. He tells us that neither can open the box until he calls us. The only other information he gives is that what's in the box is part of a pair. Then sends us off home. We both get home, place the box on the table and sit in a chair waiting for the call. He calls and asks us if we have looked in the box, which neither of us has He then asks us to open our boxes but say nothing and so we do. With the flip of the coin, he says he will decide who to ask a question too. Heads will be me that he asks the question and tails will be you and so he flips the coin. It lands on the table showing tails. He says to you, knowing that i mention that it is part of a pair, can you tell me what's in the other persons ( Mine) box that you can not see. You look in the box and reply a right shoe. What i have just mentioned above is very similar to what the experiment was showing in the Nova Documentary. There is something important to note here. The shoes, if you hadn't already guessed, are representing the particle being entangled or perhaps split in some way. Neither of us knew until we looked what was in either our box or that of the other person. However, when we did look, we knew instantly what was in the other person's box without any information being sent. There was clearly no need for any spooky action at a distance. No information was speeding faster than the speed of light as not information was being sent. I hope that makes some sense? lol!

Why not? If in a silicon crystal with a wire addition can we interfere with the electromagnetic waves or field created by electricity flowing above our heads, in a way that aids magnetic circuitry in causing distanced objects to sync or reciprocally respond, why not us? Within us have we not the same conductors and semiconductor molecules present that have the ability to interfere with electromagnetic resonance to do the same thing? I think so.

Climate denier? Bahahaha! You sound like hillbillies

So when will this result in FTL communications? The act of measurement should also be an act of transmission.

I HAVE CARBON POWERS!!!!!

We Americans definitely made this video and that is the reason it has shit intrusive background music! We have zero class when it comes to making videos! Did an adult review this video before release? Best of luck, but this is awful!

Fuck hippies and Eastern mysticism. Such a load of bullshit and reasons to get high and laid.. Up yours! All hippies are junk in my vision. I wished I would have lived back then and execute them all by fire squad. Peace.. my ass! War! Die pigs!

I can't believe Einstein was wrong.. what a dummy. His contribution in this domain was huge but still was thinking inside a box like a peasant! Also he believed in god.. A clear sign of stupidity..

Bell? More like Bellend!

Quanta magazine has a good, fairly recent, article about spacetime, quantum entanglement as a error correcting code - https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-space-and-time-could-be-a-quantum-error-correcting-code-20190103/

there was a great documentary about quantum entanglement, created in 1985. - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFvJOZ51tmc&t=3s Watch as soon as possible, i've seen this documentary taken down many times now. This video stresses Alain Aspects first successful experimental proof in 1981.

Ugh. I'm so tired of these people not being able to see what is right in front of their noses. One scientist says x, another says y, but for some reason they are not capable of doing x+y=z. Electrons aren't physical, and they aren't fuzzy waves of probability. Electrons, and all other "particles" are fields of vibration. And various things cause various effects. The vibration on the quantum level encounters other vibrations which (at our level) have formed 2 slits in a board. What we see as a wave pattern on a background is just a reflection of how the vibrations from that encounter are traveling through the quantum world. The reason you can't "know" where/what they are until you measure them is because when you set off that measurement, you interact with the various vibratory fields and you CAUSE things to happen and CAUSE the effect you measure. Idiots.

If Einstein had lived another 30-40 years he would have believed in God - purely because he was very smart. Just like the smartest scientists on earth today who are continually realising the overwhelming evidence of an infinitely intelligent creator. Isn't it funny how God is starting to use the very people who thought they could prove that He doesn't exist to prove that He DOES exist!? And who can argue with a scientist, right?

totally correct! the higher the scientific knowledge, the higher the belief in God! and the scientists that are nominated to the Nobel prizes are all Isis level of fundamentalists, and when beyond - oh, heads are rolling. God is real, death to the heretics!

2:32 Big balls saw synth!

fuck the universe.. who cares? we die anyway...

omfg theirs no spooky action at a distance the light came from the same sourese why would it not be the same type of light until acted apron by a filter or detector or wall why was this made to be so misleading

Entanglement by potential gravitational energy gmm/n from whole universe concentrate on one mass as Atiyah suggested is vacuum energy ch(4.9 time proton's mass per cube of meter), ch at Atom's scale 137.036*(5.29*10^-11)*4*3.14(=1/R, chR=13.6*e) can reproduce Schrodinger's probability wave function from Dirac's quantum field equation 2ke^2, ch as cosmological constant at universe scale united ch at Atom's scale from fine structure constant.

Sub to my Channel i have something big planned the world of physics in 2019.

Einstein is a fraud. Not giving credit to his wife who came up with the idea first and helpes him wrtie the theory.

And be sure that hackers will be called to spy, monitor and spoil the advances of the opposite-Helloooooo

Wow! they are still testing reality of entanglement on one hand and on the other hand, you talk to any QM academic and they will tell you the topic is already settled and not like to talk about it, let alone scrutinize it. It has to be generation and/or measuring process that causes balancing of subsequent pairs, not the decision involving switching of detectors. Kind of Memory loophole.

some bright minds on here not the easiest to understand when first introduced

Bells Inequality may stem from……………….. Hay did you guys and Gals know. If you take a pole and stand it balanced on end, then being balanced it expresses no lateral weight. As you lean the pole over incrementally within the earths gravitational field, then the poles weight transitions throughout the 90 degree arc, til it is laying down. The interesting aspect is the weight transition is not proportional to the angle. "the incremental weight transition of the pole matches the quantum probability curve". This is an observational FACT, which should spike peoples curiosity!!! Summery A poles incremental weight transition in a gravitational field is an exact match for quantum probability of a photon passing or not passing a polarization filter," at that same respective incremental angle"! The poles weight transition follows the blue line, see link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell%27s_theorem#/media/File:Bell.svg Unpacking this consideration "in simple terms" The fundamental of the poles weight transition boils down to a consideration of interacting forces. Gravitational force and the poles resistance to that force at various angles, balance and or leverage. The photon hidden variable could use the same model. Just like the pole, the photon is associated with a (position state which requires force to overcome). And the filter (possesses the capacity to impose force that overcomes the photons position state). The hidden variable can stem from this force interaction. An important clue is that the photons do indeed leave the filter having had their position states altered, which is the proposed product should such a force interaction have taken place. So there are an uncanny number of parallels between these two prospective systems. The hidden variable as a force interaction. We are after-all talking about (EM force) interactions. (FORCE) being the operative word.

Would have been nice if they tried to explain polarization of light, which is what the scientists were measuring. Crap, they had 53 minutes. I think they could have done it.

Why no mention of the GHZ effect?

17:43 -> "at the same instant" has no absolute meaning in Physics.

Ant Man could have proven this already

This is not a documentary, its an advertisement! If you hear or read the terms like 'spooky action...' or 'god particle', skip it and save your precious time. If you are interested in astronomy/physics, check out David Butler's YouTube series. Informative and well narrated! Cheers

To put it simply its like if a particle has a identical twin that when one of the twins is measured  both twins wave back at the same time no matter how far apart they are. Its like if they are the same particle even if they are billions of light years apart. That's why it called spooky.

Roger Coppock You can't be too specific about what quantum entanglement is since it is unknown as to what it is. There is no clear definition.

there was a great documentary about quantum entanglement, created in 1985. - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFvJOZ51tmc&t=3s This video stresses Alain Aspects first successful experimental proof in 1981.

Yes, the lazy pathetic answer, good old dad! Smh! Cheers

Judah Katz I can only apologise ,the ignorance,and stupidity of some people,in this day and age never ceases to amaze me..

Ahhh.. once again, the centuries old envy and jealousy of the Chosen People! lol.. If the Romans would of never robbed Europeans of your pagan heritages and forced Christianity a concocted religion created around demonizing and delegitimizing Jews in order to justify replacing us, then no European would of ever cared enough to hate Jews and obsess over Jews and our biblical heritage. The everlasting whores of Rome!... Tesla was no doubt a great man BUT Einstein was an even greater man! You jealous piece of shit!!

Fuck Islam. Go China!!!

bazookawarren... also known as scattershotwarren. You're a bit off topic here, aren't you, dude?

The problem I have with the double slit experiment and the Quantum Mechanics used to describe it is that it doesn't tell us anything about the physical laws directing the behavior. What we have here is basically an engineering solution and not a physics solution. From an engineering perspective, attaching a probability function to describe where the electron is is good enough. In other words. It doesn’t matter what happens between the source and the target just as long as we get the desired result. Quantum Mechanics voluntarily claims ignorance to the process and it only cares about the end result and in return, we get transistors, cell phones, etc. (The modern world.) However, from a physical law’s perspective of physics, it is completely unsatisfactory. What has occurred basically is that the Double Slit experiment has turned the physical world into a game of Plinko where all we care about is the outcome not what happens in between and not only that, any outcome is theoretically possible with no understanding as to why. By the way, John Bell did not answer the question as to why. I’ve watched several documentaries on this topic. As matter of fact, this NOVA documentary is almost a copy of the BBC documentary The Secrets of Quantum Physics hosted by Dr Jim Al-Khalili. All these documentaries spend a great deal of time talking about the Einstein and Bhor debate because it makes for good drama, therefore, good TV but basically no time is spent explaining the why and that is because Quantum Physics has not been able to explain itself. If you are wondering what Plinko is. it is a game that reminds us of the Double Slit experiment. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFFgz6fSLvk

If you say you understand QM, you don't.

+RAZTubin You're missing the point. There _are_ principles. Things are random, yes, but they follow well-defined probabilities. There are principles like the Wigner-Eckart theorem, but you'd have to take a course in graduate school to learn it. You have the uncertainty principle. There is the Pauli exclusion principle, without which there'd be no chemistry. There's the principle of superposition of amplitudes of wave functions. If you cannot distinguish between the outcomes, you add the amplitudes first, then square them. There's Max Born's principle of the probabilities being given by the squares of eigenfunctions. There's the Schroedinger picture vs. the Heisenberg picture. There's the fact that observables have to be real numbers and represented by Hermitian operators. There's conservation of angular momentum. There's spin and the related space quantization. There are very specific rules for adding angular momenta. There's the de Broglie wavelength of matter. There's the Einstein equation relating energy of a photon to its frequency. There are the equations for black body radiation in terms of light being quantized according to the Einstein relation.There's the principle of quanta. Quantization of charge. . . . Need I go on? These are not random things. They are well-established principles of quantum mechanics. How do we know they're right? We use them to make predictions, and then do experiments to check the predictions. And QM always wins. Always. Aside from compatibility with General Relativity, no one has ever found anything that shows there's a problem with QM as a model of nature. You seem to think the randomness implies total chaos. It does not. There are many principles and rules. The randomness is just the selection of outcomes of a particular process. It may be that a certain state undergoes beta decay 99% of the time, and something else 1% of the time. That's a well defined rule. The only random part is the odds of which will happen. Out of 1000 decays, close to 990 of them will be beta decay. Sometimes it might be 991. Or 989. But the long term trend is 99%. And these percentages are given by the theory and experiment shows them to be right. Consider a casino. Probability everywhere! But the house always wins. It works. There is obviously far more to quantum mechanics than you know. There is overwhelming evidence that there is intrinsic randomness at the subatomic level. If you don't like that, find an experiment or argument to prove it wrong or find a universe that suits your tastes (as Feynman said early on in the QED lecture that's online). Confuse an equation with knowledge? Math is the language of the universe -- of nature. There may be a limit as to how deep you can go. What's gravity? Well, it's A. Well, what's A? It's B, of course! You can always ask to go level deeper. That doesn't mean it's not physics.

+betaneptune Here's something to consider and I'm not saying you're wrong. QM uses probability which means it is not wrong most "probably". The problem is, how accurate is it really as a description of the underlying principle. Probability is a great tool too resolve uncertainty. It can tell what the result of the lottery can be but it doesn't tell you how the draw machine is functioning. QM is not wrong, but it doesn't feel accurate cause people got tired and decided to infer that what the math reflects is reality. Probability most reliably describes electron behaviour so electron is a probability wave. We don't know if the cat is dead so it is both dead and alive. While you're at it, cats fly when they are not being observed. Last one is my theory.

​+betaneptune I am not asking the Universe for anything nor am I interested in the drama of a classical vs QM debate. The debate is useless and distracting. I want QM to provide some "principles" and not just an average of numerical values which give acceptable solutions to the Schrödinger wave equation. It is my view that things are not as random (or weird) as it is often stated. Things are just different. If QM were truly random we would not have any use for QM. This tells me there is indeed something deeper than just a probability equation. In other words, there is something more than QM. That is what I want to see from physics. And nope, I am not the guy to do it. I am not smart enough for that but I sure don't want people to be satisfied with the current state of QM and confuse an equation with knowledge.

+RAZTubin It's physics. Making transistors and lasers is engineering. Testing and discovering the laws of quantum mechanics is physics. Why are observations any less physics than "what goes on in between"? Why are observations "engineering"? Because we don't have 100% complete knowledge, what we do know isn't physics, but engineering for some reason? There are gaps in all fields of knowledge. Are they, therefore, engineering too? We know there must be a wave function which determines the probabilities of various outcomes. As best as we can tell there is truly intrinsic randomness. If you don't like that you're welcome to come up with something better. The Universe "owes" you nothing. It is what it is.

+betaneptune If all you care is about is the end result ("it is what it is") which is the only thing Quantum Mechanics does then it is an engineering solution. Don't call it physics.

QM makes predictions on what can be observed, and it always seems to come out right. It says (at least in the Copenhagen interpretation) that the wave function tells us all there is that can be known or even is real. You find that unsatisfactory. But the universe doesn't owe you satisfaction. Like it or not, It is what it is.

I had to smile when the hippies were introduced.For them, it was total confirmation, but the scientists at the time didnt pay much attention. They alraedy knew what spooky interaction at a distance was from a metaphysical perspective, and being phycisists also , actually realized the GUT. As well as the recognition of the holographic universe, they also saw the parallel universe connection. One of the better known examples being the astral reality. The best depiction was not written in the incredibly complex language of mathematics, but in the Holywood script of movie Contact.Carl Sagans last great contribution. No space, just consciousness creating from the quantum field of infinite potential.

Able Baker I know what instantaneous means. I’m sure you’ve got some meaningful things to add since you spend a lot of time discussing the shape of our planet.

Ezeckel Reichert Learn to read.

+Robert Cathcart Ironic then that Einstein's goldfish was probably smarter than you too.

+Enter the Braggn' No... that isn't what instantaneous means.

+Enter the Braggn' No... that isn't what entanglement shows.

+Robert Cathcart Crack is one hell of a drug, huh Sparky?

+jeffwads Not quite. Certainty should always be qualified, but within an appropriate scale, enough data demonstrates that a conclusion is warranted. A Concordance is powerfully persuasive evidence that the general form of the conclusion is in fact, no longer a question for serious debate. That is when two or more completely separate methodologies reach the same conclusion. Thousands of years ago, it was the common wisdom that the earth was flat. In the appropriate scale, this is correct enough to demonstrate reproducible predictive utility. After all, correcting for curvature isn't necessary for any construction of human scale. Then Eratosthenes demonstrated that the earth only appeared to be flat because its curvature is very large. That the earth was indeed not flat, but spherical... He did it with amazing precision considering the primitive tools available. We have photographs and video of earth taken from orbit. The concordance of a completely separate methodology makes saying, "the earth is spherical," a very reasonable assertion. It can be stated as a matter of fact. Between the earth being flat and being spherical is a major revision in fundamental theory. but, the earth isn't Perfectly spherical. There is a problem with global scale cartography and the orbits of some satellites if the math used to model it is spherical... Earth's mass and angular momentum causes it to bulge slightly at the equator. It is more correctly an oblate spheroid, but even that is only a less imperfect approximation. Refinement of scientific theory very very rarely produces an entirely new theory to replace an established one. The overwhelming majority of corrections made are of the second sort... that earth is close to spherical but just a tiny bit squashed rather than perfectly spherical. If you scaled earth to the size of an 8" bowling ball, the difference would be about the thickness of two sheets of typing paper. Not a correction of fundamental theory. Just a correction of very tiny detail. There are people today that insist that this is still open for debate of major, fundamental theory. They claim that the earth is really flat and they can spend $5 and buy a domain name and post a website explaining how there is some sort of conspiracy.... and that all the scientists, engineers, pilots and navigators, and people who graduated from high school are part of a global conspiracy... There is a bitter irony that flat earthers can be found in every corner of the globe. Anthropogenic Global Warming is supported by at least three different models, each of which uses different methodology. Better than 95% of researches actually in the field agree on the fundamental nature of the observable climate changes. There is no controversy except from conspiracy theorists, fringe cultists, and the batshit crazy. And... big surprise... they overlap with members of the flat earth cultists and the anti-vaxxers. Always insist on peer reviewed publication as source, and learn how to actually read those papers for yourself because any idiot with $5 and too much free time can put up a website claiming to have tje "real truth." ...and some of them are perfectly happy scraping up actual scientific research and making up a complete fantasy to explain what the paper says. So... keep an open mind, indeed. Just don't leave it so open that your brain falls out of your head.

+Enter the Braggn' So you think laughing and shaking your head are impossible to do simultaneously. That figures. And your attempts at insults definitely make you seem more knowledgeable. Everyone knows that you win by being loudest and most obnoxious.

Well caught. I think the problem with doing that might have been how much time they had to present vs how much time would be required to explain statistical analysis in a way most of the audience could understand. I think they could have done it by condensing the "weirdness" aspect but they are dealing with such a deep subject, there really isn't any way they could present it without leaving holes somewhere.

Ezeckel Reichert Which one? You do both at once? I’ve never seen that. Good luck finding those Space Clocks or maybe just stick to Star Wars videos kid.

+Enter the Braggn' Lol. Smh

Ezeckel Reichert Good. Piss off idiot.

+Enter the Braggn' There's clearly no point in engaging with you. You can easily find the truth of these matters if you look for it and not for whatever random YouTuber "theory" confirms your own preestablished biases

Ezeckel Reichert Nonsense. Gravity propagates faster. This is shown in Newton’s equations based on observations. There’s a lot of energy in an atom. How fast do you think subatomic particles move?

Dr. TJ You’re clueless. Resonance:. the condition in which an electric circuit or device produces the largest possible response to an applied oscillating signal. MECHANICS the condition in which an object or system is subjected to an oscillating force having a frequency close to its own natural frequency. 4. ASTRONOMY the occurrence of a simple ratio between the periods of revolution of two bodies about a single primary. 5. CHEMISTRY the property of having a molecular structure which cannot adequately be represented by a single structural formula but is a composite of two or more structures of higher energy. 6. PHYSICS a short-lived subatomic particle that is an excited state of a more stable particle.

Since this comment is pinned by NOVA, I direct you to see my other comment on it's own thread for potentially the secret of the universe, not that it ultimately matters anyway according to my latest analysis.

+Alexey L Wow. You actually just feel that entitled. Okay.

+Dr. TJ, stop spamming my inbox. I am not watching your stupid Nova garbage, youtube has a reply to comment form, FYI.

+Ezeckel Reichert, if you pay for it. Nova should rename itself to "Boring Garbage that spams my youtube home page".

+Justin James Hooman First of all, fourier transfers, dirac equations, and the electron orbitals were not mentioned in this video and I haven't attempted to comment on them, so you have no idea whether I lack understanding in these areas or not. That was an assumption on your part and we all know that assumptions make an ass of you. As I explained to @Enter the Braggn', "magnetic resonance" has to do with atomic or particle reactions and includes what happens in a common microwave. Resonance by itself refers to sound. Again, people getting things wrong because they don't know the definitions of words. My only substantive comment on the video was describing a ratio between entangled and non-entangled particles in the experiments and if those ratios matched. I would have liked to have known what these ratios were from the experiments and how they compared. Someone at NOVA appreciated my comment and pinned it, so at least they recognized it might have been useful to include that information. As for @jeffwads, please don't lump me in with that fool. He knows nothing about science or the definitions of words.

+Enter the Braggn' What you are thinking of is "magnetic resonance" which has to do with atomic or particle reactions. Resonance by itself refers to sound. Where did I say light wasn't a wave? Are you trying to say I said something I never said? Weird. You said:" If light was the fastest thing we would get pulled to where the sun was eight minutes ago." Huh? What does this even mean? At a minimum, I hope you do realize that the reason the Earth doesn't get pulled into the Sun is due to the Earth's sideways momentum: http://wtamu.edu/~cbaird/sq/2013/07/01/why-doesnt-the-earth-fall-down/ The gravity of the Sun propagates at the speed of light, the same as gravity anywhere in the universe. This seems to be something you should have learned in 3rd grade, but apparently you missed that day. And based on your comments, I suspect you missed a bunch of other days as well. But keep bringing the insults because they only display your ignorance.

+Alexey L I'll make this simple for you. If you think this video is garbage, why are you here listening to it and commenting on it? What possible purpose can your negative comments have? Don't bother answering, everybody knows the answer is none. And I was right, you have zero self-control.

+Alexey L Maybe you should take some advanced physics classes at a university, then.

+Enter the Braggn' Light moves at the fastest possible speed through a vacuum. We call that speed "The Speed of Light", but the two concepts are separate. Some argue that it's more accurately called "The Speed of Causality", or something similar. The speed limit exists independently of light, and while light may be one of the few things which can reach the speed limit, said speed limit is not defined by it.

Bail Bondsman he's right your wrong, no theory in science can ever be certainly proven. Even the most solid theories ie laws of thermodynamics are not certain.

Lol yeah maybe you should let them know of your experimental genius, mr YouTube comments "dr". Wanka.

"Pulp Science" abounds on Y-Tube, you don't have to search for it, it finds you.

I couldn't stand more than six minutes of this, can we just go back to making normal documentaries please!? The constant suspense for nothing is distracting and very annoying. Good day Nova. Smell you later..........

Quantum computer,,, yes ! ! ! My old aunt Tillie had one in her bedroom closet, I saw it years ago when I was a kid. She said "Don't Touch It". She was a retired Astrologer. ????????

I had to smile when the hippies were introduced.For them, it was total confirmation, but the scientists at the time didnt pay much attention. They alraedy knew what spooky interaction at a distance was from a metaphysical perspective, and being phycisists also , actually realized the GUT. As well as the recognition of the holographic universe, they also saw the parallel universe connection. One of the better known examples being the astral reality, where creation is " instant". The best depiction was not written in the incredibly complex language of mathematics, but in the Holywood script of movie Contact.Carl Sagans last great contribution. No space, just consciousness creating from the quantum field of infinite potential.

Ok that was abracadabra So whats the use of two particles can be in two different places at the same time? whats the result of that?

I don’t get it, initially we are told that when a particle is activated another particle is “automatically” activated but in the test two particles are sent from the source to two different filters and then measured. How is that a prove of anything than your two filter system will generate a random result based on pure chance?

"anthrojestic" = "enthusiastic". That's a new one...

the fact that the entangled particles comunicate implies time and space,the real mindfuck is that they are onE and the same xD

Is my comment even real?

I can just imagine the internal battle Einstein felt while struggling to comprehend quantum physics, such that he would name it Spooky Action at a Distance. It likely made him question everything he knew about reality, likely his own sanity

Einstein was a clown. Max Planck true genius of science.

"Shut up and calculate"

That's a lot of work 'just' to get randomization. I don't understand how previous experiments could not have been randomized.

OMG... this actually brought me to a deep realization, the dots are starting to connect wow

WRONG!

PLEASE JUST SHOW US THE RIDDLE OR EQUATION OR WHATEVER YOUR TRYING TO DO SO I CAN SOLVE IT BEFORE NOON TOMORROW BREAKFAST

1888 need him call toll free

BORING

49:50, If this theory is true, and what we view is an illusion, then when I pick an object up and move it, this would cause instant change from where it was being projected from, making a connection at infinite distance. Am I understanding this correctly? And since nobody knows where I'm going to place this object, but there are only so many possible places I could put it, the object is only where it is once discovered?

Pretty sure they were saying to that computer screen in Vienna, this means nothing to me! Hahah

The Shrodinger equation is Beautiful and is mathematicly Beautiful. I also think, Richard Fynman was absolutely brilliant.

They used a star to seed a random number generator!

Was it Durak whom Einstein said he had trouble following and understanding Paul Duraks theory, he said it borders on genius and absolute madness. But Einstein is without a doubt took the first step only after Sir Isaac Newton. He was an incrediblely, amazing, and amazing brilliant man.

Put a 1000 light years between these particles and see if quantum entanglement remains. If it does, I'm convinced. If it doesn't, Einstein was correct.

38:35 so the eavesdropper replaces both with a quantum tangled pair... hehe

Programming was the hidden missing physics.

I have no published papers. But, after 50 years of interest in unified field theory. In this humble context. I believe that both Einstein's equations, And quantum mechanics. Do not realize. NOW is NOW. What you do. IS what you do NOW. Entanglement, applied clock adjustments, mass adjustments. All due to speed, size, distance. Each a realitive observation. Because, it IS realitive. You can not infer. That your observations are, "of the NOW".

If it's a riddle he didn't really solve it did he?

The Force (GOD) is with us.

My brain is a quamtum

We may never understand the universe, but we must try. Government funding is critical, for the price of a few jet fighters, We may solve the secret of pollution-free energy and faster than light space travel. Right now the Chinese are out spending us, and out producing us on research. Soon, the best minds will migrate to China for support, leaving us a poor has-been as a world leader. We need another JFK to wake us up.

Music way too loud and unnecessary.

I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night but I still don't get it.

Sorry I'm 10 minutes the music is over powering , so do me favour and take a quantum leap

What kind of assholes make these dramatized misinformation videos? With statements like 'Quantum theory suggests . . . ' :(

Why oh why did the guy at the end spoil it all by claiming he just wanted to know what God was thinking when he created the Universe? After all that great science we get such a childish and simplistic comment! Moron!

(The basic motivation is just to learn how nature works)

Was gonna watch the video but 55mins jeez who has the time. So ithought maybe I look at the comments for the answer why was the at in the box anyway. So I'm gonna ask Donald coz he knows more about anything than anyone ever

pity about the distracting music. had to switch it off and look else where

I want to understand quantum mechanics not listen to a blog about icy weather on some island. The show is 53 min and 8 min in 4 min have been some BS no one gives af about. I know this show is trying to help idiots like science, but honestly just let them watch ice road truckers and spare us this reality TV filth.

This sounds like Deepak Chopra...

Einstein vs Sensationalist Entertainment Pseudo-Science Television ….. I'll believe in the guy that did incredible things for the world. He even thought himself wrong on some things that he ended up being right about after his death when things played out. That woman is being a little deceptive in comparing computers that exist with something that doesn't. "Quantum Computing" is real but read the text https://www.research.ibm.com/ibm-q/ the tense is in the future, not now. Shows like yours are terrible you put makeup on something and try to pass it off as something it's not. Pseudo-Science for clicks, views, like, shares, and entertainment.

obvious flaw is to just assume that the two quasars, though separated by einstein type time and space, that they are not connected and are truly random. and that the act of selecting the filters, just the act of selecting, regardless of how, would affect the outcomes, the entanglement apparencies .

на моем ютубе а где перевод?

Correction: Einstein predicted the higher correlation he just did not want to accept.

Einstein got his ass kicked

Here is a copy and paste of my latest Theory Of Everything idea along with it's associated gravity test for what I believe gravity truly is: Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a. My Current TOE: THE SETUP: 1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism. 2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.). 3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them. 4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them. 5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them. FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO: 6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field. 7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field. 8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality. 9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons. 10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary. 11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks. 12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do. THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA: 13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc. 14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe. 15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe. 16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate. 17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure. 18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons). THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY: 19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up. 20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency. 21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies. NOTES: 22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well. 25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true. 26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught? DISCLAIMER: 27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty. _________________________________________________________________________________ Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way. a. Imagine a 12 hour clock. b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions. c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions. (The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.) d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields. e. Do this with the em fields on and off. (The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.) f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects. (Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.) (An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.) 'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done. 'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.

+Charles Brightman 1. The Internal Photon Level: All triangles add up to 180 degrees, how can the 3 forces be interacting at 90 degrees?

Copy and paste of my idea concerning bending of 'space time': Consider the following: a. Wavelength equals speed of light divided by frequency. b. Wavelength is how far a single 'em' photon goes in space, or possibly is the size of space itself. (Especially since 'space' itself has not been defined yet). Possibly different sizes of space for different 'em' frequencies. c. Speed of light: 'light' being 'em' photons, 'speed' being distance divided by time, distance being two points in space with space between those two points. d. Frequency being 'hertz', 'hertz being cycles per second, or how far an 'em' photon goes at a specific size during one second. e. "IF" wavelength changes (the frequency changes) then the distance a single 'em' photon goes would change and/or the size of space itself would change (assuming that an 'em' photon makes up 'space' itself). f. Possibly 'space' varies due to 'space' being made up of 'em' itself and as 'em' frequencies change, 'space' changes. g. Another possibility would be that as the wavelength changes (frequency changes) then as the distance a single 'em' photon goes would also change in it's time of existence, 'time' would change for any given 'em' photon length. The effect of that single 'em' photon makes in it's given time of existence. h. Possibly 'time' varies due to the wavelength of the 'em' photon. i. So, possibly 'space' varies due to energy frequencies changing and 'time' varies due to the wavelength of energy changing, the 'em' photon being energy itself. And if as I currently believe that what is called 'gravity' is actually a part of the 'em' photon, then the 'gem' photon makes up the energy unit that possibly makes up everything in existence in this entire universe including the universe itself, including 'space' and 'time' or 'space time' itself. It is also how space and time can warp, bend and vary.

Space and Time, for me: 'Space' is energy itself. Wherever space is, energy is. Wherever energy is, space is. They are one and the same thing. And for me, the 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe. 'Time' is the flow of energy. 'Time' (flow of energy) cannot exist unless 'space' (energy itself) exists. And 'space' (energy itself) that does not flow (no flow of time / energy) is basically useless. An entity cannot even think a thought without a flow of energy. If all the energy in the universe stopped flowing, wouldn't we say that 'time stood still'? Time itself would still exist, it would just not be flowing, (basically 'time' stopped). But then also, how space and time are linked in what is called 'space time', (energy and it's flow).

Here is a copy and paste of my explanation for the wave particle duality: It is only an idea on my part but it goes something like this: 1. Charged particles have their associated magnetic fields with them. 2. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them. 3. Photons also have both an electrical and magnetic components to them. 4. Whenever a proton, electron, or photon is shot out of a gun, it's respective magnetic field interacts with the magnetic fields of the electrons in the atoms and molecules of the gun itself, the medium the projectile is traveling through (ie: air), and/or from around the slits themselves. 5. Via QED (quantum electrodynamics), newly generated photons might occur. 6. The projectile goes on it's own way and the newly generated photons go on their own way. It gives the illusion of a wave particle duality, but it is not that way in actual reality. 7. Specifically in the case of protons or electrons, the newly generated EM wave travels faster than the particles. The new EM waves go through both slits and sets up "hills and valleys" of field energy. When the proton or electron goes through one of the slits, it then follows whatever "valley" it enters thereby over time, even shooting only one proton or one electron at a time, the interference pattern will still emerge. 8. As far as detectors are concerned, they probably have an energy field that is one way when on and a different way when off. The interaction of this energy field (or the lack thereof) with whatever is passing through it, gives the indication that is observed. Now, for those who hold fast to reality being probability waves that are condensed down by an observer into one single physical reality, then: a. What exactly are these probability waves made up of? b. Where exactly are these probability waves stored at until they are observed? c. How exactly does an observer in physical reality actually observe these probability waves and condense them down into one single physical reality? d. Who and/or what observed the first observer? e. What exactly happens when two or more observers observe different probability waves? Which one takes precedent in physical reality? For me, while this observer condensing probability waves down into one single physical reality might work well on paper, it does not appear to reflect actual reality. Now, utilizing the scientific principal of Occam's razor, which way is more probably correct? My way by utilizing known scientific principals, or that is as discerned on paper as stated above is how reality actually is?

Here is a copy and paste so far concerning the math for the TOE: The mathematics for the TOE doesn't even exist yet as far as I am currently aware. It goes beyond any quantum field theory formulas that I am currently aware of. The outline though is basically as follows: The formula has at least 3 levels to it: 1. The Internal Photon Level: The 3 interacting forces, (which might even be just a singular force with 3 different modalities), all interacting at basically 90 degrees to each other and all simultaneously pulsating and swirling. A complex part of the formula but I believe to be totally doable. 2. The External Photon Level: For each pulsating, swirling photon, all the pulsating, swirling photons interacting with it. An exponential part of the formula that I am not even sure modern day super computers could adequately handle. 3. The Inter-dimensional Photon Level: For each modality within each photon would have an energy frequency associated with it. The energy frequencies could be seen as being in their own space time dimension. (For me, 'space' is energy itself of which is the 'gem' photon and 'time' is the flow of energy; 'temperature' is the interaction of energy), so one would be dealing with way more than just 3 spatial dimensions and way more than just 1 time dimension (as there would many different energy frequencies with many different flows of energy). Whenever like resonate energy frequencies resonated with each other, they would affect each other, kind of like 'spooky action at a distance'. Anytime energy frequencies overlapped, there would be a temporary spike of some sort in each space time dimension. In addition, if in reality the 'gem' photon is just a singular force with 3 different modalities, it's possible that energy could 'slip' between modalities which would also affect the results. A very complex part of the formula on top of all the complexity that came before it. 4. Any time any energy moved in the system, the entire formula would have to be recalculated due to potential ripple effects. Like I said above, I don't even believe the mathematics exists yet for what I am trying to do, but at a minimum, the formula would contain the above levels the way I currently see it to be. ______________________________________________________________________________ 'IF' my latest TOE idea is really true, (and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time), that the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe, and what is called 'gravity' is a part of what is currently recognized as the 'em' photon, then the oscillation of these 3 interacting modalities of the energy unit would be as follows: Gravity: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction; Electrical: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction; Magnetic: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction. Then: 1 singular energy unit, with 3 different modalities, with 6 maximum most reactive positions, with 9 total basic reactive positions (neutrals included). Hence 1, 3, 6, 9 being very prominent numbers in this universe and why mathematics even works in this universe. (And possibly '0', zero, for no flow of energy, hence the number system that we currently have).

As always the arrogance of some of these scientists & physicists is really incredible. They think they know everything . In reality .. they know very little . When I was young , I thought I knew everything but the older I got the more I realized I knew virtually nothing .

All very nice. But please explain HOW entanglement works. Not that it's true.

Its 'seems' we have a current race within homo sapiens evolution , which is only 'part of a Species' of Homo Sapiens,' in known Earth History to be the 'Creators' of the current Sixth known mass extinction. Its interesting in the illusion of the social conditioned Ego intelligence, through the manipulation of the Earths once beautiful intelligent ecological systems. They claim they are the 'chosen people'.Them and other sub consciously conditioned homo sapiens evolutional behaviours of paranoid expressing have destroyed them and many other Species Habitats.  .Notice no other Species thinks homo sapiens are so clever as they disappear (become extinct) and slip into a Mars type environment. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLCF7vPanrY&t=255s

Politically correct public broadcasting has to highlight this ethnic woman scientist (earning double brownie points)...pretending that women have made (and are making) important contributions to physics.

Admittedly I don't understand what quantum theory is all about, but I do have curious questions: - Why do they only perform experiments with two subatomic particles or just two observations, why not do more than two? What if you do three or more observations, and the third or latter one don't conform to the change of properties in the first one? How can you be sure there is still an entanglement there if you don't perform experiments on that, do they simply just assume? Or does entanglement itself only works with two particles and two observations, anything more it will just fall on its head? - Since they say in quantum theory, observation turn things into reality, observation by who? Human? Object? The universe? If the whole universe itself can be the observer, then it must mean anything can be everything in the universe, right? There would be really no point in whether you, me or anybody else be an observer of anything, because the universe is always there watching.

+Able Baker fascinating, I understand there is much MUCH more to it than can be said in a youtube comment, but thank you for the explanation. Do you work in the physics field by any chance?

Nobody else does either, you don't have to give yourself up like that......just go with it.

'Observation' is any interaction that depends upon the entangled state of the particle. This is called Observation because whatever strategy one used to detect the particle's state (to collect that state as data) would necessarily have to interact with the particle in order to do that. In the the macroscopic world that we experience, that would be insane, but at the scale of sub-atomic particles, things really do work this way. In actual quantum entanglement one particle has a specific state, and the entangled particle has the anti-state. If a particle had right handed spin, its entangled partner will have left handed spin. This is why they are measured in pairs. Larger numbers of particles can indeed be entangled, which is what a Bose/Einstein Condensate is. Under certain conditions the wave-like properties of particles can be made to overlap each other, which makes it impossible for them to remain uniquely individual particles. It becomes like one particle being in multiple places at once. The reason chiral entangled particles are so interesting is that they could be used to communicate instantaneously over any distance. Create entangled particles and separate them in different containment fields. Send one of with a martian science mission and keep the other one at mission control. By flipping the state of the particle on one end, the state will simultaneously flip on the other end. All you need is a binary transmission protocol and you have instantaneous data transmission. That means the end of communication satellites and internet latency as well. We would no longer need to litter the sky with space junk just to bounce a cell phone call from NYC USA to Sidney Australia. The fact that the earth was between them would make no difference. ...and if we figure out how to reach the stars someday, it will make real-time two way conversations possible in spite of the light years between them.

There is no empty space it is big field where everything is connected together.

Amazing and important topic, presented in the most mind numbing and boring way. Quantum Entanglement: Gravity might just be an entanglement effect. Implication: Everything in the entirety of the Universe is connected to everything else, by way of Quantum Entanglement. Boom! There it is!!

Simulation Theory aka Virtual Reality - is the only unified theory that perfectly bonds both theories together, like a perfectly matching puzzle. We are living in the Sims game. The physicist Tom Campbell is working on set of new quantum experiments right now, to gather more focused evidence that this is the case. Go checkout his work, it's mind boggling.

Yes... Painting bullseyes on the target after you shoot up the side of the barn does explain everything. It just isn't an explanation that's terribly useful. No... Appeal to batshit crazy isn't the 'only' explanation.

Obviously a couple of hippies get high at a casino and started filming....and here's what came of it.

C is a constant... it is the speed of light in vacuum. It is not a quantity of anything. People who pretend to understand rigorous scientific disciplines that REAL physicists dedicate their lives to understand, need to go fuck themselves. Keep your Depak Choprah to yourself.

Ok there smart guy, stop pretending you know more than the rest of us.

+Denver Donate bIlughbe’!

Star Trek will be back next season and I'm sure the Klingons are working on that.

You're living in the era of clickbait, views, likes, millennials, social justice warriors, and generation snowflake......did you think you were going to see a show with science in it?

Able Baker Wow. You do. You think time is a physical thing that can be bent. Change your name Unable.

+Enter the Braggn' And right on schedule... You go Full Metal Straight-jacket. Try to come to grips with the fact that you're a complete moron. Your postings consist of equal parts Batshit Crazy and Word Vomit. Just have a seat and the men in white coats will be along presently to collect you.

Able Baker Did you study physics for 4 to possible 8 years only to now realise time isn’t a physical thing?

Annnd another retard bites the dust because he’s just realised that time isn’t a physical thing. You guys are really intelligent

Able Baker So in your arrogant mind gravity isn’t a force, it’s bent Space Clocks. Is that correct?

Able Baker Newton’s equations don’t include time and they work based on gravity that exceeds light speed by about 20 billion times.,Clocks don’t measure time. Time is not a physical thing in itself. Never has been, never will be. We use clocks to track celestial movement. Time dilation is just a change in energy. Gravity is a force. Um yeeeah should I go on? Thanks for playing

+Enter the Braggn' You actually aren't explaining anything. You're expressing an opinion that isn't grounded in reality. The problem is that you lack the education to understand how little of the subject you understand. Your lack of intellectual discipline leads you to the incorrect conclusion that your academic failure qualifies you as more expert than those who have invested 4-8 years of very hard work, mastering the subject. It's called the Dunning Kruger Effect... ...and you appear to be its posterchild.

+Enter the Braggn' Yes, indeed we do. Gravity waves propagate at the speed of light. Newtonian mechanics is still useful within its appropriate applications, but it assumes a fixed frame of reference... in which time is a constant. For anything that is moving at an insignificant fraction of lightspeed the error is negligible which is why Newtonian mechanics is still used for almost every engineering application of less than orbital scale. A few earthly applications like GPS satellites, require both Special Relativity and General Relativity corrections. Special Relativity to correct for the very small time dilation caused by the orbital velocity of the satellite. General Relativity to correct for the curvature of spacetime of earth's gravity well. Both corrections are tiny and the corrections are opposed to one another, but the orbits aren't perfectly circular so the SR correction changes slightly throughout the satellite's orbit. If these corrections weren't made, GPS wouldn't be close to as accurate as it is with them. It would be useless for applications like turn-by-turn directions which require precision within a few meters.

+Able Baker ikr

+lucky irvin he's a troll don't feed him

+simon simpson In physics and most of science when a theory is "certainly proven" it becomes a law which is indisputable within its specified parameters therefore yields certain.

+X - Force Probably best not to engage with @Enter the Braggn". I've proven he's either a troll, so stupid he can't interpret what he reads, or both. It also appears, based on his last reply to me, that he's also forgotten how to type.

X - Force Yes?

+Enter the Braggn' What?

Dr. TJ

+Enter the Braggn' Wow, are you really that stupid? The article said that the speed of gravity has come under pressure from brane world theories, which suggest there are extra spatial dimensions rolled up very small and gravity could take a short cut through these extra dimensions and so appear to travel faster than the speed of light – without violating the equations of general relativity. So the article was disputing the brane world theories, not supporting them. And the speed of gravity has been experimentally proven. Newton was wrong and so are you.

Dr. TJ Omg In that article they use extra dimensions to explain it. You are monumentally dumb. Quantum entanglement and Newton’s equations show that gravity is an “instantaneous” connection or at least at a speed that far exceeds light. I shouldn’t have to explain that that speed is required for a coherent Universe. I shouldn’t have to explain the slingshot effect you would get if gravity propagated at the speed of light. I shouldn’t have to explain the speed of subatomic particles when light is made of atoms. Their orbital motion is going to be much faster. I’m done. Cognitive dissonance is your middle name. You think what you want. Good luck with the Space Blankets made of clocks.

+Enter the Braggn' You're just plain wrong: https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn3232-first-speed-of-gravity-measurement-revealed/ Newton thought gravity was instantaneous, but he was wrong too. And what experiment have you run to show that the Earth doesn't get pulled to where the Sun was eight minutes ago? Don't bother answering, we all know you haven't run such an experiment.

Dr. TJ You’re a waste of time. I explain something to you and it just goes in and out. Light is not the fastest thing, this is a fact. Gravity on a galactic scale is instantaneous. We don’t get pulled to where the Sun was eight minutes ago. There’s a picture of you in the dictionary next to cognitive dissonance.

+Enter the Braggn' So you've conceded the other points? Thanks.

+José Hunter's EW&F Remixes Better refuse lazer surgery in that case .

+Enter the Braggn' Those particles dont move. Any flat earther knows that hehehehe (not that I am)...your flat- ery comment disappeared.

I would believe in ghost before I would believe in Quantum foolishness.

Only in equations do we find things like Dead-Alive cats, and quantum Confused People, who think they are scientists.

Scientists = Dumb as a box of rocks.

just one red herring in these conclusions: do we really have the technological capability to examine the quantum world, or are we getting ahead of ourselves and taking our flawed results for the truth? I am almost certain that all this dogma will come to be refuted in the future.

I like the soundtrack!

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSSn00mEbHQVnhtq_rc_sYA/videos?view_as=subscriber

Still can't wrap my head around the concept that the very act of observing will determine a particle's state. What if a blind and deaf person is near a particle? Aren't "observations" merely how our brains process the stimuli around us through neurons and chemicals? How could that possibly influence anything? Unless i'm an idiot just understand that " observation" means something different in physics.

Why would the age of the light streams from pulsars make their polarization any more likely to be random than that from any other natural source? Why didn't they just say "polarization" instead of red and blue filters, which is very misleading, even for a dumbed down explanation.

So whats is entanglement !? Maybe a photon can exist at the same time, in another "observed dimension", so proprieties are the same......?! But why doe you have then negative results.......?! (entangled > not entangled) Can it be the same photon particle and we observe it, as parallel effect........spooky connection......between particles does not explain what this connection is ......... Sorry if you guys feel I ask a stupid question, I´m not a super smart, just very curious.... if some 1 can clarify this for me, a really appreciate..... thanks

I think these folks are full of crap. A waste of money.

So I have a theory about this. What if particles can connect in a way that they are entangled through a higher dimension, orthogonal to the familiar dimensions of space. Once connected, a change in one would be instantaneously transmitted to the other bypassing the 3 dimensions of space. To simplify, imagine if two particles are connected in a two dimensional plane which is orthogonal to the third dimension. No matter where each individual particle moves in the plane, they will always have the same location in the third dimension.

aren't the entangled pair just a positron and an electron created by the materialisation of the laser photons when passing near the calcium nucleus ?

does entanglement do anything when the particles are galaxies from each other that is faster than light? physicists say the particles don't 'communicate' or 'travel' FTL. FTL travel (of anything) is not possible they say. yet 2 particles reflecting each other in entanglement are the same even when there are light years between them. then what mechanism or property of entanglement is that can have these particles always being in parity even if they are galaxies away from each other? seems like saying that there is not 'communication' between the particles here is just a way to fit in that nothing goes FTL. clearly within entanglement something is causing the particle to be the twin of the other when changes are made, even when light years are between the particles. i don't know much about this subject so please forgive my ignorance here. entanglement has been in many science documentaries.

This isn't E vs B in their models. Einstein stated that there is something missing in the model to explain entanglement. The biggest problem is that you cannot discover anything here because all you are proving is that we are observing particles mostly and not waves in any and all of the experiments. Until someone can observe an interference pattern while observing a photon or particle, it is impossible to really get the sense of entanglement. Particles could easily have the same probability density function relative to time so that when it is observed at x, the probability that the particle is at time x is 1 for all particles with a similar probability density function. Einstein was saying that there is something there that they are missing and that they shouldn't stop because it works. The key to science is being able to ask the right questions and then be able to test those questions. Most likely since particles like photons are traveling at the speed of light, time is more important to quantum mechanics as the speed at which particles move in their PDFs would be at the speed of light and be incredibly bouncy there and be incredibly random but it could be that there is a sense of unity in their randomness.

So, the know it ALL's developed equations/mathematics to be able destroy the world and the very nature which created them here on Earth! That's not smart but quite stupid of them! To say that one lives on either Einstein or Borh's world is pandering in order to attract dollars to a University's mathematics departments! Nature holds no secrets and is not exclusive to some "mathematical humanoid" way of thinking.

What about the particles that were not entangled? If the bubble theory is right then all of the other patches of the bubble are different realities. We can use entanglement as a measurement meaning that the closer we get to the center, the higher the rate of entangled particles. Amazing right? Although I enjoy this primitive existence.

Did every commentator watching this video until the end ?

We live in a world where objects have permanence? You've got to be kidding!

What a horrible way to end the show by making up a quote about Einstein and God's thoughts.

At (about) 32:45 to 32:48 there is a diagram with binary input and output through logic gates. It is concerning that on the left side, the inputs to an AND gate [0,1] go to output [0] which does not look correct. Then, the next AND gate (second from left) has only 1 input - assuming this means both inputs are the same(?) the input is [1,1] and the output shown is [0] - also wrong. A diagram that is art, not educational, makes me suddenly question the content of the video: is this entertainment or education? Until I saw this drawing, I viewed this as an educational video, but now I am forced to re-frame and re-assess this content. I hope that the concepts introduced to me about physics are not so carelessly depicted as the diagram in the video....

I am amazed and pleased at the number individuals that have watched this video. Whatever your opinion, I don't care, you're watching this type of material and that matters. I have yet to see a video that clearly explains the validity of entanglement. What are the individuals expecting to see exactly? Is it two photons, both vertical or horizontal? Is it two photons, one vertical and one horizontal? Is it two particles, both spin up or both spin down? Is it two particles, one spin up and one spin down? When did these particles become entangled? When did these photons become entangled? Was it two inches from their shared source, or maybe it was a meter. No locality of two photons produced by exciting (laser) two electrons to a higher shell and creating these photons when they return to a lower shell? No locality if the electrons are not in the same atom but are excited by the same laser? Has Pauli's "exclusion principle" been invalidated. Show me two independent sources (completely independent) producing photons or particles examined by randomly selected filters using two quasars. Lets see if they are entangled just because you want them to be. Explain the experiment in detail, not general descriptions but exactly how and where the particles (or photons) are produced. Describe in detail the method of detection whether detecting photons or particles. Describe the results, I don't want "positive" or "negative" results. I want "both particles, were spin up or spin down" or "one was spin up and the other was spin down". I want "both photons, were vertical or horizontal" or "one was vertical and the other was horizontal". Now that would be a video to watch.

i like brian greene version. :)

All those bells and whistles with remote observatory and quazars just to generate random numbers??? Wouldn't it be easier to use lava lamps? (https://youtu.be/89EX1NF7eHQ). But I guess it was nice to get out from the lab into the mountains? The next random generator will involve tail wags of an endemic species of fish living in the Maledives. An EU Grant will pay for it.

+Matter AntiMatter thanks

Not if it isn't observed!

+RavenShield78 Not just tides either. Look into 'Earth Batteries' and/or 'telluric currents'. Supposedly if one were to bury two large metal plates perpendicular to these currents, basically flowing from/to the poles and equator depending upon the time of day, it acts like a capacitor in the ground. One plate takes on a positive charge and one plate takes on a negative charge. One of the problems right now with that though, is that the Earth's magnetic poles are moving, and even some reports I have seen say the poles have split, two north poles one being stronger than the other and two south poles one being stronger than the other. The strong poles are both currently heading for the Indonesia area, or so the reports seem to indicate. But anyway, take the dc electricity from these plates (or any source of dc electricity) and melt and electrolize snow and ice (especially from the upcoming mini ice age that will be coming), to get hydrogen and oxygen that can either be burned to get heat and light or utilized in a hydrogen fuel cell to get the electricity back with a by-product of basically pure water. People will need pure water too. See my Twitter page under the same name as this comment to see just some of what this world is doing as many nations implement hydrogen into their economies. For anybody with money, or want to make money, and know what they are doing, the hydrogen sector is growing and will be doing so for quite a while. Invest wisely.

+Charles Brightman Well I applaud you for your noble reasoning, and everything you say makes perfect sense, even for me. It seems to me that Tides are a really good example of your explanations.I also agree with you that space is more than just an empty void, if light has no mass, how could it possibly be effected by gravity "black hole"?

+RavenShield78 Thanks, and yes, agreed. But as far as gravity and the 'gem' photon idea goes, consider the following also: a. The Earth's magnetic field is basically at 90 degrees to the Earth's electrical currents flowing through the surface of the Earth (telluric currents) which are both basically 90 degrees to the direction of gravity. b. The flat spiral galaxy having a magnetic field on each side of the plane of matter which is basically 90 degrees to the electrical plane of matter, which are both 90 degrees to gravity which comes together in the center of the galaxy as a gravitational black hole. c. But I fully acknowledge the gravity test above would have to be done to prove or disprove this idea. And note also, that is why in the test the 'em' fields are 90 degrees to each other while the laser would be 90 degrees to the 'em' fields. Or the alternative of either one laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the respective set up or 3 lasers set up to achieve the respective set up. If true, a small mini gravitational black hole should form that should be detectable by the ferro cells. At least if my idea functions as I believe it should. d. Why this matters: If species on this Earth don't figure out how to have artificial gravity for space bases on planets and moons, (as large rotating space ships won't really work for space bases on planets and moons), and NASA proving that low gravity conditions over a prolonged period of time are harmful to the human species, then we probably all die one day and go extinct without any humans being left to care we ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever we did and/or didn't do in this life as those space bases would probably be needed somewhere along the way out of this solar system and galaxy. Likewise, if species from Earth don't figure out how to have the necessary protections from harmful cosmic radiation energy, then not only won't humans eventually survive, but neither will AI robots. All life on this Earth dies and goes extinct. And these are only two problems that need to be successfully solved, there are many, many other problems too. But hence my thoughts and work on the Theory Of Everything idea especially as it concerns gravity. Need to do something to pass the time and keep my mind busy until I die.

+Charles Brightman Your right, I wasn't looking at it as a spiral, So it's the spinning that creates the sine wave as the polarity is in motion. That's some exhausting stuff for the average guy to try and wrap his head around, I appreciate you forcing me to think! And I'm sorry to hear about your condition, It seems we are both searching for answers we may never get.

+RavenShield78 You're thinking in a flat plane of existence. If a triangle is convex, the triangle's angles equal more than 180 degrees and if a triangle is concave, the triangle's angles equal less than 180 degrees. But consider the following: Ask yourself, what exactly causes the sine wave effect of the electromagnetic wave? If it was purely the 'em' wave rotating giving us a relative perspective of a sine wave pattern, then explain gravity and how exactly matter attracts other matter and how galaxies actually form and how gravity actually works here on this Earth. In my mind, the only sensible explanation at this time is that what is called gravity is actually a part of the currently recognized 'em' photon. But I fully acknowledge, the gravity test above has to be done to prove or disprove this idea and the gravity test will speak for itself. It will either be really true or it will not be really true. But, 'if' really true, and my TOE above is at least partly correct, then that could also help explain why certain numbers even exist in this universe, why math does what it does, what space and time actually are, and how even space and time can bend, warp and vary. But, the gravity test needs to be done and I don't have the necessary resources to do the test, and I am currently in a terminal stage of cancer. My 'time' is running out in this 'space'. Edit: Consider the following as well: If one were to look at 'em' being in the x and y planes of existence and being 90 degrees to each other, think of gravity being in the z plane of existence and being 90 degrees to the 'em'. And then also, 'if' gravity were also a sine wave pattern, as controlled by 'em', then 'em' would also be a sine wave pattern controlled by gravity. The 'gem' photon would pulse from a point possibly even too small to detect to basically a sphere, back to a point, etc., and when it moved, it would move in a sine wave fashion. Since it was moving, it's possible that at least one modality would be slightly ahead of the other two and hence cause the 'gem' photon to rotate. This is still all dependent upon the results of the gravity test above.

So you are a REAL intellectual? Explain that using guantum theory.

Wow I'm so happy for you. I love being blinded by brilliance and baffled by bullshit. Bet you have many friends. Hahaha

+Robert Cathcart I don't think you even understand what you're talking about

Robert Cathcart Of course but someone decided to spend billions of other peoples money to claim otherwise on experiments that are unrepeatable. It’s obviously to do with clocks

+Enter the Braggn' -- now youse all are startin to get it --- Gravity is an energy.

Moe Green So you’re another one that thinks gravity isn’t a force and is bent space clocks?

+Jun Xian Wu -- you are one of those people that's going to find out the hard way that in the Galaxy we live in there is no such thing as time and space there is only matter and energy.

+Robert Cathcart He was definitely smarter than you. No doubt about that. :)

+Enter the Braggn' - now its possible i'm getting ahead of myself... maybe i have too much confidence and trust in LIGO :) i'm not sure if dual grav/optical confirmations have been performed yet... i think so far there are 3 grav-wave detectors with plans for more to be built... if they need 4 to do precise triangulation then the tools aren't in place yet but possibly such confirmations are only 2 years away or so?

+Enter the Braggn' - the LIGO that Thornhill claims is phoney enables multi-messenger astronomy or to use a term i am personally fond of "multiple source confirmation" :) namely, gravitational disturbances corroborated by subsequent optical measurements for example, if there are four LIGO installations on Earth precise "triangulation" becomes possible... i believe they use the method of calculating the point where four spheres intersect? (mind you, i am not sure what method they use, the four spheres intersection is just my guess :p) once a coordinate has been calculated it can be transformed into the RA/DEC format and telescopes can be pointed at that region of space if the four LIGO tripwires were tripped by two colliding neutron stars i believe this often results in a gigantic shower of EM waves that the telescopes can see? if gravity waves travel at the speed of light, then the leading grav-pulse will be close to simultaneous with the EM shower... perhaps not 100% simultaneous but probably close enough within a couple seconds :) now... suppose such an event takes place... and furthermore suppose the collision is at a spatial coordinate that a telescope somewhere on Earth just happened to be pointing at... a telescope unaffiliated with the emerging multi-messenger programs... an "oldschool" telescope if you will :p first the LIGO operators can get their multi-messenger confirmation by directing the subset of telescopes under their command... but this only gets them confirmation of an EM shower already in progress... but then by searching an astronomy database they could learn of that oldschool scope that just happened to be pointed at the correct general region if that oldschool scope was set to record images, they can then watch what was recorded... they would see a patch of sky... and then at the moment of neutron star collision an explosion of light suddenly come up at the predicted coordinate with such a method confirmation would extend beyond light showers already in progress... it would demonstrate explosions emerging in regions of sky that were previously dark and if such double optical/grav-wave confirmations take place many hundreds of times i think that would rise to a high level beyond at least nagging doubt, no? in my opinion many people who allege conspiracies with insufficient evidence are infected with nagging doubt... what might be called a "doubting disease" i think what has happened is they have been betrayed by others and are walking wounded... or in really monstrous cases, they have betrayed others but never fessed up to their actions, and try to throw up a smoke screen about all the betrayers "out there" that are not them lol but if such nagging doubts and trashy conspiracy theories can gradually be flushed from their hearts through hundreds of dual LIGO/JamesWebb observations, then perhaps it could accurately be said that their hearts were healed by starlight? :)

+Enter the Braggn' - hmmm... in this video "Big Science and the Impossibility of Gravitational Waves", Wal Thornhill is not only objecting to gravity waves... he also objects to the CERN LHC at around 4:37 minutes into the video he says they are "wasting billions of euros" chasing after the Higgs boson do his objections strike you as plausible? while he does not use these exact words, to me it sounds like he is accusing the CERN LHC venture of being a giant scam... that they are publishing data to justify their expenses do you get the same impression or am misinterpreting him? what he is saying would imply a giant conspiracy of thousands of individuals all scratching each others backs, dedicated to lying to the public and totally OK with committing huge fraud does that seem plausible? what is the statistical likelihood that in a collaboration of so many thousands there would not have been at least a couple whistleblowers? Thornhill is telling us that every single person of the 10,000+ scientists at CERN are dedicated liars? that sounds absurd to me! i do not know Thornhill well, but to make such accusations without substantiation seems like poisonous levels of cynicism to me... methinks that man is speaking monstrously his words also have a disgusting sickening similarity to the accusations flat earthers make about a global scientific conspiracy about the shape of the Earth LOL they too make the claim that scientists march in a transnational lockstep, with not a single whistleblower having arisen in over 50 years of rockets has there ever been a giant criminal conspiracy in all of human history that did not have double agents, whistleblowers, remorseful or repenting adherents, or dissidents? i am trying to think of one and i cannot think of any... do you know of any? the NAZI party had a large number of participants... but there was not uniformity of thought amongst them... a plot to kill Hitler arose within the NAZI party itself! in other words, there was not perfect cohesion and devotion the plot to kill Julius Caesar arose amongst the Romans... but Julius Caesar was a Roman! it is well known for many centuries that unprincipled thieves and liars will often stab each other in the back and betray each other.... it is a statistical historical likelihood, not a law of nature mind you... they lack a love of truth, a love of mankind, and a love of each other... so eventually the statistical likelihood is that they start to turn on each other and blackmail each other, no? if CERN is a den of liars why do we not see such turmoil within their ranks? the CERN LHC took 10 years to build... from 1998 to 2008... if the Higgs boson is phoney as Thornhill claims, what do you suppose guided the LHC scientists to wait 4 years to discover it? the Higgs was confirmed to five or six sigma precision on July 4th, 2012... if the entire operation is fraudulent from top to bottom, what guided them to make an announcement after 4 years? why not take 2 years, 3 years, 6 years or 8 years? was 4 years just some arbitrary random die roll? i share Thornhill's suspicion that there is an EM aether or medium that Einstein prematurely discarded as "superfluous"... and this suspicion is shared by Frank Wilczek as well but i think that Thornhill is speaking monstrous words and is filled with cynicism and poison... his manner does not strike me as conservative, to make such gigantic accusations of his fellow man with no proof to support that a conspiracy is taking place the conservative route to take would be to say "i suspect that CERN is fraudulent but i do not have evidence to prove my suspicions"... but Thornhill is not doing that... he is making declarations!

Nova is fake anyways, just a made up non profit organization. Anything and everything is made up, even a celeb. No one ever lives their dream, they are made

The practical proportions of the matter has no data reflecting the physical in fittest

It's a inconclusive hypothesis

Moe Green The equation in question is Gm1m2/d2

Moe Green Let me know if you want more of those videos and I’ll happily give my opinion on the best ones to begin with. Oh yeah and I agree with what you said. And yes Newton’s Theory runs into some problems but it does show gravity propagates much faster than light and the so called spooky action at a distance confirms this along with the likelihood of an aether.

Moe Green Another nice short and to the point video regarding “gravity waves”. https://youtu.be/G2xEmFoc_0U

Moe Green https://youtu.be/6tB3IBXTgEc

Moe Green A little on Einstein, Newton, Maxwell, Heaviside. Only 12 minutes:

+Enter the Braggn' - "If light was the fastest thing we would get pulled to where the sun was eight minutes ago. There would be no cohesion, no solar systems/galaxies." ya that is an interesting subject imo... Sir Arthur Eddington objected to the idea that gravity waves are limited to the speed of light... i think he tried to show mathematically that solar system orbits would destabilize over a span of centuries unless the influence of gravity was instantaneous, not capped at the speed of light however consider that his objections were raised around the 1920s or so... think how many graduate students and professors studied the subject since then is it plausible to think that not a single one of them noticed such a serious error in constraining gravity to 300,000 km/sec? my guess is that Eddington's objections were officially refuted somewhere between 1920 and 2018... and that gravity was shown to move at the speed of light... but i do not know by whom... but i think it must be the case? because were it not so, it would mean the model of general relativity that has been programmed into supercomputers is in error... and would this not have resulted in models deviating from observation and noticeable GPS errors? science is filled with many hundreds of such unheralded cul-de-sacs :) consider for example the idea of the atmosphere rotating along with the Earth... its a subtle detail that is not really covered extensively in K-12 education... but it is kinda stunning to think that the vast majority of air particles surrounding us when we step outside into a windless environment are actually moving at over 900 miles/hour... but we don't know it because so many thousands of earthbound elements are moving at that same speed... so there is no contrast for it to stand out as unusual or noticeable to our senses like the probable refutation of Eddington's objections, it is a subject that has not received extensive coverage in K-12 and so remains almost totally unknown in my opinion it is important to document such cul-de-sacs, even if most of the scientific community views them as irrelevant distractions hehe so i would like to learn the name of the man or the woman who refuted Eddington mathematically but i guess its also possible that Eddington's objections were never noticed by anybody... we shouldn't discount that possibility... consider how many homeless people have uttered false delusions over the centuries... some of them shout their delusions rather loudly... but if their words make no sense or cannot be proven mathematically by others they are often simply ignored as noisy cranks it is possible that Eddington was never officially refuted by anybody between 1920 and 2018, but simply ignored as a deluded fellow or something :p

+Enter the Braggn' - " He postulated that nothing exceeded the speed of light yet clearly sub atomic particles move much faster which is required for Newton’s equations. " are you referring to Newton's equation of gravity? or which equation do you mean? hasn't it been shown that gravity waves move at the speed of light? according to such findings, were the Sun to somehow instantly vanish, the Earth would not receive the news gravitationally or optically/electromagnetically for 8 minutes... we would still see the Sun in the sky until approximately 8 minutes later when suddenly it would blink out hehe

UnAble Baker https://youtu.be/9CYBa3UWbF0

Able Baker And electromagnetic retardation is still a thing despite your meaningless comment.

+Enter the Braggn' And yet GPS works despite your opinion.

Dr. TJ Omg In that article they use extra dimensions to explain it. You are monumentally dumb. Quantum entanglement and Newton’s equations show that gravity is an “instantaneous” connection or at least at a speed that far exceeds light. I shouldn’t have to explain that, that speed, is required for a coherent Universe. I shouldn’t have to explain the slingshot effect you would get if gravity propagated at the speed of light. I shouldn’t have to explain the speed of subatomic particles when light is made of atoms. Their orbital motion is going to be much faster. I’m done. Cognitive dissonance is your middle name. You think what you want. Good luck with the Space Blankets made of clocks.

From an economic analysis I would state that the ownership and make believe realm has secured an interest. Can you inherently tell me exactly the difference between a qubit and a bit. They both are yes or no. and when calculating something there is programing in which utilizes teh same properties in a larger scale, and the city... fastest route example is poor. There is no way to determine the process speed. If you have a map... of all points.. X. The computer inherently contains the answer already of which is the fastest route, becasue its all data and programmed in... So it would take seconds to simply isolate teh route for the user. then there is intuitive feedback from living users and traffic control information... and thus the route is changed instantly to follow that direction. Then there is the what I call teh linear path, which is the most square path, its typically a mid way, but it uses the least amount of turns or complex traffic junctions. So again, I would state that this comes across as a public narrative to steal teh inheritances of the American people. As soon as I saw an Asian in the field ther is little trust. Korea, undermined electronic market. China the rag market with Hong kOng. Japan and its social engineering and Russia with entertainment and well Africa as the aggressor in other areas, ad ntehft and choas.. .So its afeel good show that provided no evidence and therefor is ruled incomplete and uninformed.. The ideal fo quantum computing was another form of encryption that existed in the 80;s, Which was a way of making ciphers. So basically you could take all the literature of any book written in the entire world in a 40 string line of characters, in which a complicated forumale could reconstruct that information. However, if you increase the itereations of the charactes one could create page, in which any cipher put to it, would give out information. Of course someone would have ot have tehcipher, but that is like most encryption techniques... its nonsense and sometimes impossible to find what it is stating witout a pattern. Of couse the method I state has and would contain a pattern. So one could write in a variant form in which it has no congruent pattern. this then contains no math within its core as its contains no pattern to be deciphered and so the message cold be written in a different war. This could be decoded, but the other that reads it that is the same as the one that wrote it, ie, living quantum mechancis. Meh.. where was I going with this.. I would state.. the world is a unkind world... contraptions and knowledge, but... lacking a kind spirit, simply socialized and created by apparently high minded crazies, and clearly sharingthigns with such spirits of the flesh... do onto all of life terrible things.. and so it causes and destroys all teh foundatiosn layed nad put down..

It's all a recipe

It seems that those producing the content of the program and those responsible for the music are not entangled.

Another program of lies to program stupid people to believe lies.

oh and how about dark matter as space scaffolding

Is the intention to confuse or explain the experiment ?!?? Entangled pair of photons are generated on Earth. They have nothong to do with quasars. Quasars are used solely as random number generators for uninfluenced measurements on entangled states. Thats all.

time is unity

surveillance as entanglement

Spooky math is what we have here. Follow the math down a rabbit trail and it leads nowhere.

this quantum entanglement fact still can't explain the biggest puzzle: what is the meaning of life

If there's no "space" then wwhat did the Apollo missions fly through?

24:33 Hot nerd chick!

Spooky action at a distance... LOL, that's what the Spanish Inquisition said about witches...

Relativity didn't prove going faster than the speed of light was impossible (as the narrator describes), it was only a convenient hack to make physics work...

Sᴏᴍᴇ Dᴀʏ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴡɪʟʟ Iɴᴠᴇɴᴛ ᴀ Qᴜᴀɴᴛᴜᴍ Bᴏᴍʙ, Fᴀʀ Mᴏʀᴇ Dᴇsᴛʀᴜᴄᴛɪᴠᴇ ᴛʜᴀɴ ᴀɴʏ Aᴛᴏᴍɪᴄ Bᴏᴍʙ... Iᴛ Wɪʟʟ ʙᴇ Cᴀᴘᴀʙʟᴇ ᴏꜰ Dᴇsᴛʀᴏʏɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇ Uɴɪᴠᴇʀsᴇ. Tʜɪs ɪs Wʜʏ ᴛʜᴇ Sᴄɪᴇɴᴛɪᴛs ɢᴇᴛ Fᴜɴᴅᴇᴅ?

It is not whether it's in Tangled it's hell to control the entanglement it seems very clear that magnetic fields could be more powerful in the entitlement

haha did it really take a quantum computer to figure that out 35:05 looks obvious

It's so creepy how enthusiastically you mention the atomic bombs, a warcrime.

I enjoyed the electronic music!

I can hear God singing, .."you are always in my mind"

I would like to think the moon is there not because I am looking at but because GOD put it there - Elbert Einstein is still correct.

The most mind boggling part of this? That the magician got paid to perform 3 tricks and they used it a hundred times without paying royalties

Pretty cool video, love this stuff. I was a Physics major (with an eye towards Theoretical Physics) in my lower class undergrad years before switching to Engineering, and I have my own unproofed mind exercise theory on Entanglement that I won't get into in this post. However, Re: Quantum Computing/Quantum Computers I would like to make a comment. First let me say, this is not classified as it was previously approved for publication, albeit sparsely, to an open source Industry media publication, but it Is little known. The F-35's suite of sensory systems' software code was/is so voluminous and complex (Read: Robust/Lethality Enhancing) that it became almost impossible to debug (as one basic example, regression testing) by conventional computing methods/machines, which led the vendor to purchase at least one Quantum computer. That is all (a recently retired PhD. Computer Engineer who worked for a large American defense contractor for 32 years. Regarding Niels Bohr. I've always liked what he said about the possibility of building a nuclear bomb during WWII. He stated that while it was theoretically possible, it wasn't going to happen because it would require one of the big industrial countries to convert their entire economic and industrial base into a singular project to build the weapon. After the war when he was chided for being wrong and upon touring the U.S. Manhattan project sites at Oak Ridge, Los Alamos and Hanford, he stated "see I was right".

Quasars are not so far away as they assume. They have an intrinsic red shift. See my YouTube video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ywu8cVgRpwE&t=142s

Why is entanglement so scary?

Not good.

Time is an illusion. It doesn't really exist. The illusion of time exist because of our movement through space. The faster you move through space the slower time seems to pass. They theorize that at the speed of light time would stand still. What no one talks about is the reverse. The slower you move the faster time would pass. What about what would happen to time if you weren't moving at all? True dead stop? Time wouldn't exist. The state you would be in then would be eternity, eternity not being a very long time but no time, a second, a billion years, all the same moment. Without time distance becomes irrelevant and particles can be linked anywhere.

+Beena Plumber True dead stop is not moving at all. We are moving at extreme speed. Our Galaxy is moving. Our sun is moving relative to that. Our world is moving relative to our sun. Our planet is spinning on top of that. We are not at a stop!

That's really an interesting thought experiment. But there's one problem. You are always at true dead stop unless you are accelerating. Everything moves relative to you. If you are going 99% the speed of light, from your point of view, time would be normal, like at a dead stop. The weirdness is in everything you see moving past you. It would all look super high-speed. Still, your watch would show time passing at the same rate as always. I think the problem is that we have an illusion of moving through time. I think that's an artifact of how our brains work. We could just as likely be moving through one dimension of space, with all eternity happening at once, but we only experience one event at a time as we move spatially.

Nova when to hell the day a Kroch Brother took it over.

It really cracks me up when a person can believe in a holographic universe but yet a prime mover (God say...) is a nutty idea.

It requires a special kind of idiot to believe that dice (Particles) will roll up the same numbers infinitely; be entangled.

If your conclusions make no sense, they are ipso facto WRONG.

No matter how hard you try;' no matter how hard you push your expectation into your conclusion; in this, Einstein was correct.

I love how you so casually interchange words that mean a thing is DEFINITIVE with words that mean a thing is UNCERTAIN. Correlation and proof are NOT interchangeable.

Entanglement doesn't say that one photon can be in more than one place. (That's somewhere else in quantum theory.) Entanglement says a photon pair is generated together, and they are forever entangled. If you do something to one photon, the other will immediately respond, even if it has reached another galaxy. The scientists don't know what the connection is, but one explanation might be that the universe is really a giant hologram, and we all exist in the shell and the universe only appears to be 3D. What confuses this even more is that the scientists they interview don't know the answers, but in this program they don't say that clearly. So if it doesn't make sense to you, it might be because it doesn't make sense to the scientists either. I hope this helped! I prefer curiosity in a friend over smarts.

You need to have a really nice wank - maybe in the bath in candle light. Treat yourself. One little mistake isn't worth the headache! Add a really nice bottle of champagne. Let one slip past, one little mistake. You've got more important things to think about, like whether you can edge until the champagne is gone. Enjoy!

Both you and the object exist on the surface of the sphere. It only appears to happen inside the sphere. There is no speed at all when you change something that is virtual.

Nothing was settled!!

I have questions about the theory of woven universes The woven universes are connected together in the cosmic carpet But these woven universes are separate in time Because there are new universes because of spatial expansion 1-The first question is about the density of matter and energy in the universe How much energy and matter is there in the universe? 2-The second question is about the curvature of the universe Is it a zero curvature or positive curvature or negative curvature ??? 3-The third question about the extension of the place of the universe Is the extension of the universe final or has an infinite stretch? If we live in the Infinite Universe, this is evidence of the existence of the woven universes Please send my three questions to cosmologists

+Jun Xian Wu --- you've lost it and really badly too.

+jeffwads you are correct that nothing is written in stone when it comes to science but that it happened at all is the main point.

A nice little video here on the speed of gravity as long as the viewer posses some critical thinking skills. https://youtu.be/73mZMcV-OgU

+Robert Cathcart Reality is purely theoretical

+Jun Xian Wu -- I'm talking about reality not mathematical theory science that cannot be demonstrated experimentally. I put Einstein in the same category as that ridiculous ''Weekend at Bernies'' stiff Stephen Hawking, the pair of them tried to theorize reality mathematically -- it don't work it's just ''theory'' -- real scientists deal in facts and experimental demonstration.

These videos are always entertaining, if at least for the completely derange comments tat appear below them. It's as if these topics tend to attract the lowest of I.Q. individuals when you would assume the opposite.

Good subject matter but could not watch due to the loud obnoxious background noise/music/drums.

The truth is we have within us (not for the moment counting the spiritual), the natural, any one of a world of traditions and, what is considered in any age to be civilised. To abandon any of these selves in favour of just one is to limit our joy in life and our belonging. I am a musician. My eldest son has an A1 degree in physics. He tried to tell me once - just once - that music can be explained by mathematics. I simply answered that one subject does not rule another, though it may well contain elements of other subjects. Any subject, including physics, is simply a degree of the whole circle of human activity ... no more! I abhor this manic obsession with technology!

Tell everyone!

if matter can neither be created or destroyed, then how can it be observed or not observed? could light always be one particle, but just many places in the universe at once?

crap .. 20 years ago they gave the right info .

They obviously don't understand what they speak about, so, to present that as teaching us, [and entertain us with nice music] is irrelevant, this universe is being created all at once, [not created in the past!] only taking a space/time location, one self, one incarnation, as you do now, creates the illusion of time, which is perceived motions, this acting like a prisma, allowing us to perceive waves, from a given position, so making us able to perceive sounds waves, and colors waves. Einstein got many good ideas, but never ever understood the counter nature of time, as he would have read more into Hinduism, he certainly would have being able to ''unify'' all theories in one !

Other news