New Screen Tech That Can SAVE Your Eyes

Show video

Anjan Katta: Most other displays when they light,   they have something calLED flicker or pulse  width modulation. And the basic idea there is,   the way they change brightness, is they turn  the light on and off at ridiculous amount of   times per second. And the idea is, it's too fast  for your eye to be able to see it. There's a bell   curve to people's sensitivity to flicker, and  for a lot of folks, it's subacutely causing   them to have some cognitive load and some  stress and some sympathetic arousal. This   is the best evidence for its impact is people  who have had concussions or traumatic brain   injuries. One of the core things that's painful  in the time after the TBI or concussion is screen  

time. And the core culprit of the screen time  is the flicker of the backlight. And so when   they use a reflective display, like a Kindle or a  Daylight, they don't have the same migraines and   headaches from screen time and eye strain. And  so I think that is a really, really good clue. Ben Greenfield: Fitness, nutrition,   biohacking, longevity, life optimization,  spirituality, and a whole lot more. Welcome   to the Ben Greenfield Life Show. Are you  ready to hack your life? Let's do this.

Ben Greenfield: If you're watching the video version   of this podcast, I'm holding up this tablet.  It's this weird paper-like tablet that I've been   messing around with and is based on this new ink  technology and kind of a new way to light screens.   I find this stuff fascinating because anybody  listens to this show knows. I'm kind of skeptical   about the, well, I'm not skeptical about, I'm  wary of the effects of light pollution. And I'm  

very picky about the kind of light I use in my  house, my light bulbs, lighting in my bedroom,   you know, my blue light blockers, all of that. But  sometimes it's difficult to control the screens.   So I wanted to talk today about the science  behind all of these things that we're staring   at during the day, how we should think about  that, and what kind of technologies exist or   could be invented that could help us out with  this whole uphill battle against artificial light. Ben Greenfield: So I found this guy,   Anjan. Anjan Katta. Katta. Katta?  Did I butcher that again, Anjan? Anjan Katta: That's right. Ben Greenfield: Katta, Anjan Katta. And Anjan  

actually is behind this company Daylight. And  they're pretty groundbreaking technology company,   because they figured out how to make screens not  have all these issues that modern screens have,   issues that we'll talk about in today's show.  So all the show notes are going to be at   bengreenfieldlife.com/Daylightpodcast.  Just Daylight, just like it sounds.   Bengreenfieldlife.com/Daylightpodcast. So, Anjan,   tell me about, tell me about how you  got interested in screen technology.

Anjan Katta: Thanks for having me   on first, Ben. This is cool to, I've been  listening to your show for a long time,   and it's cool to finally be here to share  what I've developed. I think for me it was   just the realization that at the end  of the day, what we call a computer,   if you ask a little kid to point, if you  have a desktop, point at the computer,   they're not pointing at the desktop tower. They're  pointing at the monitor. For all the complexity,   for all of the power of a computer, at the end of  the day, a computer is a screen. That is the core   way in which we interface to a computer,  in which the computer interfaces to us. Ben Greenfield: Yeah. And by the way, you are correct,  

because I remember when my family got our very  first computer, I had no clue what the box   beside it was for. Eventually, I took computer  classes and I learned how to take apart the   hard drive and fix things and clean out the  fan and everything. For the longest time,   it was just this mysterious box next to  what I actually interacted with, the screen.

Anjan Katta: And that's the core thing is if we want to   change our relationship to computers, if I wanted  to change my relationship to computers, which like   they're toxic, I found them extremely distracting.  I find them messing up my sleep, messing up my   circadian rhythms. They keep me inside. I could  never really be focused. My nervous system is   jacked up. I learned that at the core of that  is the light, the junk light that a computer is   creating is then the ensuing software that is not  set up to be in alignment with your sovereignty.   It's not set up for your focus. And so I got  really interested in the idea if computers are  

not going away, if we're only going to use them  more, how can we reform computers to be healthier,   to be more analog feeling, to be better for our  nervous system, better for our mental health,   better for our physical health? And that's when I  started to research alternative computer screens. Ben Greenfield: Yeah. And surely the EMF, I doubt you would deny   that the EMF is also a problem. But I mean, like,  at my house, everything's hardwired. So I've kind   of fixed that issue, and I can install software  on my computer that kind of dims the screen. And I   might ask you questions about that software later  on and what you think about it. But, yeah, it is   kind of interesting that you're just kind of stuck  with that screen, whether in bed or in your office   or whatever. And the technology doesn't seem to  have changed much. But I'm also kind of a luddite.

Ben Greenfield: Like, I don't know   what kind of advances have been made in screen  technology. Like, have things been changing at   all? Because surely somebody at Apple or  whatever is aware of some of these issues. Anjan Katta: That's what's pretty interesting, is ultimately   all the computer screens around us are actually,  for the most part, just one category of computer   screen. These are calLED emissive or transmissive  computer screens. If you go back to the history of  

early computing, back in the day of Xerox PARC,  those are the people who came up with the first   graphical user interface as the modern computer  really was invented by them. They were playing   around with a bunch of different modalities to  computer screens. Of course, projectors are one   of them, but the other one is something calLED  reflective or paper like screens. And the basic   idea is, in physics, you can see something because  it is producing its own light, like a star or a   Firefly. That's calLED a transmissive or emissive  screen. That's what everything around us is.

Anjan Katta: Or you can see something   because it's like a natural object. It reflects  light. It bounces the light of the sun or whatever   is in the environment. That's how you see a tree,  that's how you see a dog, that's how you see the   sidewalk. That's how you see normal things.  And so actually, scientists at the time were   playing around with creating computer screens  of both varieties, emissive and reflective. Ben Greenfield: Now, why did. Well, it   sounds like you were just about to get into that.  I was going to ask you, why emissive one out?

Anjan Katta: So the problem with reflective is it ultimately,   at the time, was not very the process technology  was not there for it to look good. When you're   reflecting light, ultimately, whatever is the  color of the light of the environment, whatever   is the intensity of light in the environment, is  what your screen will look like. And back then,   their process technology was not high enough to  reflect a large percentage of the light that hits   it. And so what happens is in some environment  it'll look dark, some environment it'll look warm,   some environment it'll look bluer. And so if  you're trying to show movies, tv, video games,   any content like that, you need to be able to  recreate the colors. You really need to be able   to recreate the fidelity of the picture well.  And so emissive screens because you're providing  

your own light source. It's consistent  regardless of what environment you're in. Anjan Katta: You're able to control it. Ben Greenfield: Because the light   source is actually built into  the screen itself. It's backlit. Anjan Katta: Exactly. The light  

source is built into the screen. It's kind of like  a flashlight that is then shining into your eyes,   versus a reflective thing, which is  like a piece of paper where the ink   particles move to make different letters  or shapes or whatever is there. And so   a reflective screen is a natural object.  It's an analog object. But a transmissive   remissive screen is a manufactured object. But it  looks sexy, it looks consistent, it looks cool,   even if it's not natural. And that's why it  kind of won out and took over everything.

Anjan Katta: And we totally forgot that there   was this other category of displays that existed.  The big insight I had when I went back to it,   I was like, okay, we're going to use computers  forever. They're going to fill our lives. Think   about VR. We're forever living in this world  of emissive transmissive screens that are then   emitting junk light. To your point about do they  know about the consequences of this? I think the  

reality is they're late to understanding  technology from the perspective of health,   whether it be physical health or mental health.  That's not how engineers look at it. They're   looking at it from supply chain, they're  looking at it from engineering efficiency. Anjan Katta: They're looking for end user application. And the   reality is, it's also convenient because an iPad,  an iPhone, a monitor, they all can use the same   white LEDs, which are blue LEDs underneath. They  can kind of use the same screen technology. And so  

when I kind of really got obsessed with circadian  rhythms and blue light and regulating my nervous   system and felt, hey, you have to make a screen  that goes from being an unnatural, emissive,   transmissive screen to a natural, reflective or  paper like screen, because then the computer is   really just an analog object that moves. That's  when I started to do my research and find out,   oh, there's things like the Kindle and  E ink that exist, but they're so slow.   The refresh rate of the display technology, how  quickly it can scroll or zoom or type. Your iPhone   or iPad is 60 to 120. So you can scroll, you can  type, you can move, and Kindle screen is one FPS. Anjan Katta: So it's fine for   Harry Potter if you're just flipping  a page, but you basically can't type,   you can't scroll, you can't zoom, you  can't use a browser. You can't use apps. Ben Greenfield: Or watch a video, for example.

Anjan Katta: Or watch a video. Exactly. And so that was   the core insight here is, whoa. What if we could  resurrect this long lost arc to computing, which   is of reflective screens? If we can solve the  technical problem of making them fast enough, then   we could have laptops, tablets, phones, monitors,  whiteboards with these kind of healthier screens. Ben Greenfield: So the Kindle paper is an example of a reflective   screen technology that already exists that a  lot of people might have experienced before. Anjan Katta: Right? Exactly.

Ben Greenfield: Okay, so how do   they light it up? Because if I'm reading a  Kindle, I I used to have a Kindle paper. I   don't know where it went, but I remember,  like, on a dark airplane or in my bedroom,   I could still read on it. I don't recall having to  shine a flashlight on it or something like that. Anjan Katta: So what they do is they put   auxiliary. So the screen itself is reflective.  But think about, like, those little book lights   where when you're reading a book, they kind of  cantilever over. Essentially, they're using a   micro book light. And so they have lights on  the side that are then bouncing off the screen.   And so that's the idea behind that  is, well, reflective screens require   the sun. They require environmental  lighting, just like analog objects,  

how to use them at night. And so basically,  what you can use is an auxiliary light. Anjan Katta: And that's one of the things that we figured   out also, is to how to make that auxiliary light  that you can optionally. You don't need to use it.   You can optionally use at nighttime how to make  that flicker free and completely blue light free. Ben Greenfield: Well, how do you do   it? I want to nerd out on this. I'm  actually curious how you pull that off.

Anjan Katta: To give the high level picture.   What success looked like was if I could make  a computer screen that I could use in direct   sunlight so I could do more of my computing  outdoors. That didn't strain my eyes, which   meant it was reflective or paper like versus  emissive. It was easy on my nervous system.   And that's where that paper like reflective  screen doesn't have the same screen apnea,   putting you in a sympathetic response. And  it is completely blue light free. So I could   use it at nighttime or even during the day. I  don't need to wear blue blockers all the time.

Anjan Katta: And long story short,   I discovered a really old reflective screen  technology that was thrown kind of in the dustbin.   And a bunch of different professors had been  trying to work on one little problem of it for   about 25 years. Another professor for 30 years.  And so from the nineties onwards, a bunch of   random professors in Germany, Netherlands, Florida  state and Japan had been trying to solve this   problem of an old reflective screen technology  called reflective RLCD. And essentially,   I found out that the process technology  had finally got good enough. And I came   up with a way of combining a couple different  material science innovations. And so the core  

difference of this is it's a reflective, paper  like screen, but you can microperforate it, so   you can optionally backlight it at nighttime, so  you can use it at night. And it's 60 to 120 FPS. Anjan Katta: It's the same   speed as an iPad or iPhone or anything else. Ben Greenfield: That's the part that's   interesting. How do you actually go  from one FPS to like 60 to 100 FPS? Anjan Katta: So the big difference is,   in a conventional Kindle, paperwhite or e ink  screen, it's moving ink particles up and down   like this across an entire capsule. And the  time it takes to move across that capsule,  

it's like running from one side of the football  field to the other, end zone to end zone. What we   were able to do is instead we can make it go from  black ink to a white reflector. Like, kind of like   it goes from paper to the ink by turning instead  of moving the entire football field. Imagine the   football field is super skinny and you can just  kind of run from sideline to sideline, but there's   only 2ft of a gap. And so it's a total different  principle in which to create a reflective screen. Ben Greenfield: Okay, that's super interesting. Okay,  

so I want to back up a second here because, you  know, you talked about some of these problems   that you wanted to solve. Being able to look  at it in the sunshine and being able to be   able to see it well in a dark room and having  the higher resolution, or FPS. But of course,   the other thing you mentioned was you didn't want  to deal with a lot of the perceived health issues   you were experiencing from a normal screen. Have  you looked much into this? This whole concept of  

flicker or backlit LED what we're actually talking  about when it comes to the biological effects. Anjan Katta: That was one of the   core advantages of a reflective screen  is because it can be used without any   backlighting at all. There is no flicker. It  can use the spectrum of the natural light. One   of the cool things we invented on top of  that is we found a way to microperforate   the screen so you can optionally light it at  nighttime. And one of the core things we did   there is we made our own, manufactured  our own custom LEDs that have, like,   a campfire spectrum, so totally blue light free.  It has oranges and reds in the longer wavelengths. Ben Greenfield: Almost like the same type of,   like, biological LED or OLED. A lot of  people, including myself, are installing in,   say, like a bedroom or sleeping area  of the home or something like that.

Anjan Katta: Yeah. Figuring out what   wavelengths actually are healthy to sleep and  circadian rhythms and doing that. But there's   a second layer to what we did as well, which is  most other displays, when they light, whether   it be lighting around you or in your computers,  they have something calLED flicker or pulse width   modulation. And the basic idea there is the way  they change brightness is they turn the light on   and off a ridiculous amount of times per second.  And the idea is, it's too fast for your eye to   be able to see it. And if they want to make it  brighter, it's on two thirds of the time and off   only one third of the time. And they flick through  that faster. If they want to make it darker,  

it's only on one third of the time  and off two thirds of the time. Anjan Katta: And that's actually how they're changing   brightness, is they're changing the percentage of  time in 1 second in which it's on versus off. And   so when they did this, they did very simplistic  studies to be like, I guess this is okay. This is   above the threshold of cognition. The core thing  that was missed is actually there's a bell curve  

to people's sensitivity to flicker. And for  a lot of folks, it's subacutely causing them   to have some cognitive load and some stress and  some sympathetic arousal. And for some folks,   it's quite acute. And I can get to that where the  evidence is super interesting. That's the case. Anjan Katta: But we were able   to do is we did essentially what originally  LEDs were lit by, which is something calLED   dc dimming. And so basically, there is no flicker.  We created a flicker free, direct, current driven,   blue light free LED. And so during the day,  you get a paper like reflective experience.   It's equivalent to reading a Kindle or reading  a printout or a book. And at nighttime,  

you get this beautiful flicker free,  campfire spectrum optional lighting. Ben Greenfield: A really interesting way   that I think I heard this explained once, maybe  it was an audiobook, a podcast, I really don't   remember. But the comment was basically from,  like an ancestral or an evolutionary standpoint.   A human being would normally not experience an  extremely high level of flicker unless they were,   say, like, sprinting through the forest with  little bits of sunlight coming in here and there,   as they ran. Or doing something that  involved sympathetically activating   activity out in the sunlight and that there's  some kind of transfer over of that same type   of sympathetic stimulation. When you have  this flicker, even if it's sub perceptual,   when you're standing in front of your computer all  day. Is there any accuracy to that kind of idea?

Anjan Katta: I think the core thing   is the magnitude. If you're running through the  forest, we're talking about maybe like 50 hertz,   a hundred hertz. When we're talking about  flicker, we're talking about thousands of   hertz and millions of hertz. I think the answer  is yes. Essentially you're providing a stimulus   and removing and providing a stimulus and removing  and providing a stimulus. Your brain's baseline   is to want to orient towards that stimulus. And  your saccades, your ability to perceive it, are   all being confused. There's nothing in the natural  environment that turns on and off at that speed.

Anjan Katta: And what's fascinating   is for most of us I think the effect is pretty sub  acute. It's a chronic effect. But for some of us,   flicker is perceived acutely and I think this  is the best evidence for its impact is people   who have had concussions or traumatic brain  injuries. One of the core things that's painful   in the time after the TBI or concussion is  screen time. And the core culprit of the   screen time is the flicker of the backlight.  And so when they use a reflective display like  

a Kindle or a Daylight or a printout, they  don't have the same migraines and headaches   from screen time and eye strain. And so I  think that is a really, really good clue. Ben Greenfield: There's this guy   I interviewed named Andrew. I'm blanking on  his last name. I'll hunt it down and link to. Ben Greenfield: It in the shownotes Ben Greenfield: Show notes gonna be at   bengreenfieldlife.com/Daylightpodcast. We did a  podcast all about TBI concussion. He's actually   a big bitcorner, so we thought about bitcoin  and NFT and stuff like that as well. But he   was talking about how when he had a really bad  head injury, which oddly enough was while doing   intensive Wim Hof style breath work while standing  on concrete and passing out and hitting his head.   So warning to folks about stand up breath work  on a hard surface. The worst culprit in terms  

of re triggering headaches, migraines,  you know, confusion, brain fog, fatigue,   etcetera, was light and in particular light from  screens. And he became adamant like blue light   blockers and installed all the software on his  computers. Like Iris and Flux, and, you know,   would stay in a. Or stay in a dark room a lot  of the time, you know, sleep with an eye mask.

Ben Greenfield: And, yeah, there's   something incredibly stimulating about  light that becomes even more magnified,   particularly when it comes to the flicker  if you've had a TBI or concussion. Anjan Katta: I think that's what's so   powerful about this is the academic research  is still so far lagging. What is the amount of   case studies of people that we have? You go to  neurologists, and they all say one of the core   unsolved issues is what to do about screen time  in the weeks after somebody gets a concussion   at TBI. Your example of your friend where it is  magnified, I think that's what's fascinating here,   is we're still just in such early innings in  kind of accruing all of the negative stuff   from our relationship to a computer to its  blue light, to its flicker, its distraction,   and so on. And so it's almost like there's a  societal reckoning of, if this is the rest of our   lives and relating to our main sources of light  are like this, we got to do something about this.

Ben Greenfield: Yeah, yeah, I agree. And I don't want   to bore people with, gosh, it seems like I tweet  out a new study just about every week about the   impact of blue light on sleep and the impact of  things like the flicker that we're talking about   on kind of low level brain fog during the day.  We could scaremonger people all day long with a   lot of stuff that I've already talked about. But I  want to come back around to this idea of more of a   solution oriented approach. So the first question  is, before we jump back into this whole idea of   reflective screen technology and what that would  actually look like, why couldn't you just wear   blue light blockers or install a software program  like Iris or Flux for people who don't know what   those are? Those can reduce the amount of blue  light on the screen, you know, lower the color   temperature of the screen, etcetera. Of course,  the glasses can block some of that glare and   reduce some of the irritation of the flicker. But  why couldn't we just do things like that first?

Anjan Katta: I think that's a really good thing. I think   everybody who can wear blue light blocking glasses  use Flux and Iris. I'm a fan for that. I think the   problem is there, they're somewhat half solutions,  and they're kind of band aid solutions. So on the  

band aid solution point of view, I think it's just  hard to get mass compliance in society across the   board. Get kids, get everybody to download these  programs to wear blue blocking glasses. I think   we actually have to just change the computer  itself if we want this to be a mass market. Ben Greenfield: That seems like a   much bigger uphill battle, or maybe as big as  getting everybody to wear blue light blockers.

Anjan Katta: Well, I think the   difference is the convenience is the habit,  like how often you have to remember to wear   your blue light blockers. Easy to lose them if  your computer, you just use your computer as is.   But I think that's only half of the argument.  I think the other half of the argument is blue   light blocking glasses. Iris Flux, they don't do  anything about flicker. And that's one of the core   things that we wanted to do, is a reflective  screen and a dc dimming backlight. You're able   to add a hardware level, remove flicker because  there's nothing you can do at a software level.

Ben Greenfield: And that, that might be news for some   people. So if I install some kind of software  or put my phone in night mode or something   like that, and the brightness of the screen is  diminished, that's not impacting the flicker? Anjan Katta: No, that's flicker. Ben Greenfield: Is it impacting   like the intensity of the flicker, though? Anjan Katta: It's actually making the flicker worse? Oh,   the flicker is worse at lower brightnesses  because it needs, the duty cycle is further out.

Ben Greenfield: So that's interesting. And you know, by the way,   Brian Hoyer, the guy who did my building biology  walk through, he said he wasn't a huge fan of   dimmable switches and some of these bulbs that  weren't super bright but didn't have flicker   free technology built in, because as you use the  dimmer or as you use some of those, those, those   flickering technologies, it could also increase  EMF. So anyways, the idea here, though, is just   dimming the screen not only doesn't get rid of  the flicker, but it could actually increase it. Anjan Katta: Yes, the answer is yes. The flicker would   go up at the lower brightness. Something like Flux  is only reducing blue light. Like kind of 20, 30,   maybe 50%, something like Iris or putting a  red color filter reduces it a fair bit more.  

We're still like 99.9, so we're blocking blue  light at a hardware level. This is all trying   to do it in a software level, so we're able to  kind of remove all of it. And for some people,   even that 1020 percent of blue light  that's coming through is still enough   to kind of put them over the threshold.  The other thing that's happening is if you   look at the spectrum of a display, when  you have Iris on it, it's extremely narrow.

Anjan Katta: It's just basically one   red peak. And that's really unnatural. Like,  that's. You never see that in the natural   environment. If you look at the spectrum of an  incandescent bulb or a campfire, it's a broad   based spectrum. It's got reds, it's got oranges,  it's got yellows. And so that's what we've done,   is we're actually giving you a broad  based spectrum, not just a narrow peak,   that's unnatural. And we think the impact of that  is that your body can better relate to the light. Ben Greenfield: Do you know how much   of the blue light that blue light blockers  filter versus how much flicker they blocked? Anjan Katta: They don't block any flicker at all. Ben Greenfield: None. Interesting. Okay.

Anjan Katta: The flicker is   the light turning on and off. They can't  do anything about that. They're simply. Ben Greenfield: That makes sense. Anjan Katta: There's actually one   last interesting point here, which is there's a  curve called v lambda, which is the sensitivity   of our eyes to different wavelengths. So when  we do use Iris or things like that to make our  

red color filters, we're picking a red color  that actually our eyes are most sensitive to,   green. And then there's a drop off on either  side towards blues and violets and towards red.   Actually, the melanopic impact is not just  the spectrum, but is also the intensity of   photons. And so when you are that red color,  the v lambda, the sensitivity of your eyes to   that is actually so low, you need to actually  amp up the brightness a fair bit. For example,   two green photons can look as bright as ten  red photons based off of not just looking on   melanopic impact based on wavelength, but also  then combining that with what is the intensity   of photons? To actually read something, you come  out with a slightly different point in the curve,   which is optimal, which is not super dark red, but  actually more this kind of orange or fire. Now,  

if you want to do environmental lighting, red  is fine because it's kind of dim enough. But   if you want to resolve letters, which is what you  want to do on a computer, if you want to be able   to read things, you're actually better off in  our perspective from being slightly more orange   and going up the v lambda because your eyes  are more sensitive to those orange spectrum. Ben Greenfield: So you can make a case then, by the way,   if I were able to manually adjust, like the  nighttime color filter on the phone, don't have it   super dimmed in red, have it slightly brighter and  a little bit orange, because if I don't do that,   then I'm risking things like eye strain and  myopia and things of that nature. It's going   to be very difficult to find a sweet spot. Like,  you could reduce eye strain by decreasing the red   and increasing the brightness, but then you've got  more blue light, and you could get rid of the blue   light by dimming the screen and switching it  to more red, but then you've got eye strain. Anjan Katta: And that's why   we invented what we did, which  is you break those trade offs,   which is you don't get flicker. You can be a  lot lower brightness, and you can have something  

that's the combination of least amount of  melanopic lux and v lambda maximization. Ben Greenfield: That makes sense. We'll   hold this tablet again. So this one that you  guys sent to me to mess around with so I could   wrap my head around what this technology looked  like prior to the podcast is about the size of   a large Kindle or an average size iPad. Tell  me about how you went from reflective screen   technology research to actually being able to  make something that would actually work like this   tablet. Because I've got like 20 apps on, it's  got YouTube, it's got Google, it's got Chrome,  

and most of the functional apps on it that you'd  find in the Google Store or the Android store. Anjan Katta: My vision was, it took me,   I started this in mid 2018, completely spent my  entire life savings to try to develop it. And it   took three years to come up with the first proof  of concept, which was, whoa. Reflective display.   That's as fast as an iPhone and iPad, which  means you can make phones, laptops, monitors,   whiteboards, tablets. You could do all of kind  of computing with it for the first time. This was  

never possible before. It reflected displays. And  the first product I chose to make was a tablet. Anjan Katta: And the reason was it   was what I thought would have the most broad based  appeal. It's kind of hard to get people to start   by replacing their phones, but it's a little bit  easier to get somebody to replace their iPad. A   lot of kids, tablets are the main thing. They use  a lot of the elderly. And so I really felt, too,  

that a device that could be used at nighttime,  a tablet, was a great recline on the couch,   read things, relax type thing. And that's the  place where I felt computing was most harmful, was   at nighttime, that kind of night routine. And so  it took another about three years to then get the   screen technology into production, build the rest  of the hardware. Turns out building a computer   is extremely difficult, which is why there are  basically no new personal computing companies. Anjan Katta:  The last big one was Oculus a decade ago.  So it was a pretty monumental effort to  

then try to produce a computer. And then we just  launched it earlier this year and we sold out. Ben Greenfield: Have you guys done any actual research,   or have you looked at even, like, anecdotal  case studies of people who are giving it to   their kids instead of an iPad or anything  like that? As you started to roll it out? Anjan Katta: We're starting to get a fair   bit of. As we're rolling it out now of reports  back from people around how much better the kids   are sleeping, how much more energy they have,  how much easier it is to get up in the morning,   how much less distracted and addicted, how much  you're actually able to wind down. And so it's   been cool to just see that validated. There's  a fair bit of case reports from people using  

Remarkables and Kindles and things like that  that have kind of validated the reality of,   yes, if you remove blue light, yes, if you  remove flicker, you do get the impacts you   suspect. And we're basically just the same  technology now, broadening it to other things. Ben Greenfield: Well, you said   reduction of addiction. Why would that be? Anjan Katta: It's basically   you've made a not overstimulating computer. Ben Greenfield: So you've got a reduced dopaminergic   response or something like that when you're using  a reflective screen versus an emissive screen. Anjan Katta: Exactly.

Ben Greenfield: Yeah. Anjan Katta: Well, I think most people   focus just on the software aspects of distraction,  and I do think there's actually a physiological   aspect to it as well, which is the blue light,  the flicker, if you are in a sympathetic state,   you are going to seek to kind of numb that. And  that is, it's kind of when people binge eat to   deal with stress, I think there's a subtle version  of that happening with social media or feeds. And  

so in so much as you've removed the color, in  so much as you've removed the kind of the over   saturation, and you've made something that's kind  of basically boring, I think at a hardware level,   you've leveled the playing field so that these  things are no longer super normal stimuli.   Because that's, at core, what's happening  is the software is being designed to take   advantage of your evolutionary impulses and make  you into a dopamine slot machine monkey. And so a   reflective black and white screen is kind of at  a hardware level, leveling that playing field. Ben Greenfield: Yeah, I kind of became a trend, I think,   after that book Dopamine Nation. Maybe it was  suggested there. I've seen it suggested elsewhere,   too. Flip your phone, your phone to grayscale or  super red mode, which might have issues, as we've  

already established, when you're wanting to reduce  your propensity to doom scroll or excessively use   it. So, yeah, it's absolutely something I've  come across, and I'm familiar with it. But the   sun thing is also interesting to me because I  took it out in the sun. How come it works so   well in the sun? Like, without a screen protector  or an anti glare device or something like that? Anjan Katta: It's the same reason   that a piece of paper is visible in the sun  is because a normal, emissive, transmissive   screen is trying to produce its own light and  compete with the sun. And because the sun is  

brighter than your iPad or iPhone, you can't  see it. But if you think of a piece of paper,   it's not competing with the sun. It's reflecting  the sun. It's in harmony with natural light. And   that's what our display is, is it's in harmony  with natural light. It is actually utilizing the   sunlight. So when you're using a Daylight outside  in the sun, the light that's then reflecting off   the computer display into your eyes, that's  sunlight, that's full spectrum sunlight.

Ben Greenfield: Got it. So this is   very similar to reading an actual paper book  in the sunlight if you bring it out there. Anjan Katta: Exactly. And so if you   were to boil down what we've done, we've basically  made a computer that feels like paper. And so it's  

a boring, minimalist computer that's healthier  for you, and it's the least amount of computer   that you need. And that's, I think the crux of  what this is, is computers are hijacking objects,   they're overstimulating objects. How do we kind of  tame them? How do we make them our servant rather   than our master? And we think starting with the  screen, but then also the software ergonomics,   emfs. Over time, you can start to create a  whole category of healthier personal computers. Ben Greenfield: I'm kind of a Luddite.   Like I mentioned, I don't have Wi Fi  at my house. When I got the tablet,  

I just use an Ethernet cable to plug it into the  Ethernet or the Internet. And I synced some of my   preferred apps that I thought I might use with  it. Specifically, I synced YouTube so I could   watch some YouTube videos on it, and I sync  Kindle so I could download my Kindle library   to it. And I'm one of those minimalist  technology guys. I don't do a good job  

using every last feature. But tell me about the  features of something like this versus an iPad. Ben Greenfield: Like, if I were to get one of these Daylight   tablets, can I do everything with it that I would  normally do with, say, an iPad or a modern tablet? Anjan Katta: Yeah, we have two   modes to the device. We have a locked down mode,  which we call kale mode, and then a cocaine mode.   What you got is cocaine mode where there  is no software blocking or this. You can  

kind of do whatever you want. All your core apps  you'll be able to use. You'll be able to use the   browser. The only difference is anything  that's iOS exclusive or Apple ecosystem,   Apple doesn't allow anybody to  do it other than themselves.

Ben Greenfield: Right. So I couldn't sync my Apple   iOS app store with this. It would all have to be  stuff from the. It's the Android store, right? Anjan Katta: Yup, it's the Android   Store and then web apps. So this is anybody who  wants to try to make an alternative to Apple.

Ben Greenfield: What about storage   space? Is the storage space different  than that of a normal iPad or tablet? Anjan Katta: It's about the same.   It's 128 gigs and it's got a micro SD. Ben Greenfield: And it's just one.  

It's just one model that you guys have right now. Anjan Katta: Just one model? Yeah. Ben Greenfield: Okay. So that gets me thinking about just the   adaptation. I mean, you could obviously just say,  hey, we got something that's like a Kindle paper,   but you can do way more with it because you  got more apps to play around with on it. Is  

that what you guys are thinking? Or could this.  I mean, I. Because honestly, I use a tablet,   but not a ton, mostly for reading. Could this  eventually be like a phone or a computer monitor? Anjan Katta: A Daylight can actually   replace your iPad. Any of the things you want to  do, reading, Spotify, note taking, email, it can   do all of that. And our vision is now that we've  invented the first kind of high refresh rate,  

blue light free reflective screen technology, we  want to make a phone, a distraction free kind of   healthy phone that comes out of that. We want to  make a monitor, we want to make a laptop. And so   the hope is people will then have a choice to kind  of have a healthier computer. And we have a lot of   ideas of what to do on the software side, too, to  kind of make it minimalist and distraction free.   And the hope is a computer that's actually  better for you versus a computer that,   in practice, in the Apple ad, is supposed to make  you the best version of yourself. And in reality,  

you're just distracted, addicted, feeling  like shit, sleeping badly, staying up late. Anjan Katta: All the metabolic   issues that accumulate over time. Ben Greenfield: Yeah, definitely.   With overuse and improper use, it can be a  definite issue, especially based on time of   day of use as well. I mean, surely, though, the  R and D on this stuff on this reflective screen   technology was not inexpensive. How would you  compare the price point to a typical tablet? Anjan Katta: We're about the   same price as an iPad Pro or 729. It's a  first generation product. It's like the  

Tesla roadster. We don't actually make  very much money at that price point.   And the idea is, start with the folks who have  the greatest needs for this. People who struggle   with sleep, people who struggle with eye strain,  concussions, TBI, people who want to minimize   blue light, and over time, start to scale down  the price and get it more into mass market. The  

kind of ultimate audience we're most passionate  about is a healthier, safer computer for kids. Ben Greenfield: Okay. Okay. Got it. And again, like,   I don't. I don't want to say this too much, but I  am a little bit of a Luddite. Like, I don't even  

know the difference between a reel and a story.  And I'm barely capable of logging into my own   Instagram account. And so I don't quite understand  certain aspects of things, like tablet technology. Ben Greenfield: So forgive me if this is a dumb question,   but how does the stylus work? Like, what are some  ways you could use the stylus that comes with it? Anjan Katta: Essentially, what we're doing,   it's a Wacom technology. And so one of the  great parts about it is our stylus actually   has no battery, no bluetooth, no electronics in  it. So if you're somebody who's electrosensitive,  

you'll be able to operate our display without  touching something that has actively emitting   electronics. And we made the tablet actually  have a friction to it. It took us two years   such that it feels like you're writing on paper.  So, compared to an iPad, which is very slippery,   when you write on it, we try to make it feel  like our favorite Japanese paper. Once again,   how do you kind of make a magical  piece of paper as a computer? Ben Greenfield: Yeah, that's interesting. I'd   be a poor use case, because, again, I haven't  used the stylus much, but I downloaded this   workbook to it. This PDF workbook, for a branding  course that I'm going through in the workbook,   has a place to take notes, and I was taking  all my notes with the stylus, and, yeah,   it felt like I was writing with a pen on paper.  And that's not normal to feel that with a stylus?

Anjan Katta: No, not at   all. That's one of the interesting things. Ben Greenfield: Wow, how cool. So   in terms of the availability of this  thing, are people able to get one now,   or are you making so few that there's  a waitlist or something like that? Anjan Katta: We're sold out right now, but there   is a waitlist that people can put a deposit down  for, and we're hoping to get more inventory soon. Ben Greenfield: Well, that's good to   know. So let's say. I mean, you're obviously  somebody who thinks a lot about light. Let's   say I were to visit your house, Anjan, are there  certain things you've done in your living space or   something you might do when you go to Airbnbs  hotels to manage light? I'm just curious what   your own light management protocol looks like  with as much as you think about lightning.

Anjan Katta: I think the biggest thing is I try to spend   as much time as possible outside or with a window  open and get actual full spectrum light, uv and   infrared, and that I try to have a lot of natural  light during the day. At nighttime, I make sure   to have no overhead lighting. All the lighting  is not above my head and it's all warm lighting. Ben Greenfield: Why would that be? That it's not above your head? Anjan Katta: Because in evolutionary history,   you had lighting at nighttime. It was  never above. The only time lighting   would come from above is from the sun. So  if you think about fires, things like that. Ben Greenfield: That's a good point.  

I never thought about that. What about the moon? Anjan Katta: So the moon,   stars? It's an interesting question about  the moon. I actually looked into it, too,   because moonlight is reflected sunlight,  essentially. It's just intensity is attenuated   enough. But if you actually look, there's a  lot of cultures that talk about staying up  

later or being energized on a full moon, and that  might be one of the reasons why it's essentially. Ben Greenfield: Oh, yeah, I can tell you right now,   I sleep better when it's not a full moon cycle.  The thing with not having the lighting overhead,   though, how are you pulling that off?  Do you just have a lot of lamps or. Anjan Katta: Exactly. I have basically   little pools of light. I have little lamps all  over the place. And so I have. It's interesting. Ben Greenfield: What else are you   doing in terms of, like, the  style, like, in those little   lamps? Is there a certain type of light  bulb that you have in the. In the light?

Anjan Katta: Can I like. A   couple of them are incandescent. A couple of  them are blue blocked. I have some pink salt   lamps as well, because I really like  the aesthetic that comes from them. Ben Greenfield: Okay, got it. And   you're wearing blue light blockers  right now. I assume we're not doing   this podcast on your end on  the Daylight tablet, are we? Anjan Katta: Unfortunately,   the Daylight webcam attachment  is still in the works.

Ben Greenfield: Okay. Okay,   got it. So you're wearing blue light  blockers. Are you picky about those,   about the style? Or do you look at the  lens technology or anything like that? Anjan Katta: For me,   it's more just about what spectrums  is it able to block and how much? Ben Greenfield: Okay, got it. And   since you guys don't have a phone or  monitor yet, what do you do to your own   phone or monitor right now to mitigate  some of the issues we talked about? Anjan Katta: The big ones are I   try to put it with reduced white point. I  try to put its brightness at a reasonable   amount such that it's not the lowest amount of  flicker. And then I put the red color filter on.

Ben Greenfield: I'm familiar with how to   turn the red. That's easy because you can just  go to color filter settings, and I'm familiar   with the sliding scale for the brightness. But  what's the white point that you talked about? Anjan Katta: It's in a similar thing. If you   go to display accessibility, essentially what it  does is it just drops the intensity of the white. Ben Greenfield: Oh, I didn't know   you could do that. Interesting.  Okay, what about with the monitor? Anjan Katta: With monitors, I essentially have Iris   maxed out. Or sometimes if the red from that is a  little bit too intense, I'll have Flux maxed out.

Ben Greenfield: Okay. Which do you think is better,   the Iris or Flux? Or can you explain to  people the difference between those two? Anjan Katta: Yeah, Flux will have   a little more of a broadband spectrum, a little  bit more yellow and orange, and Iris will be like,   kind of pure red. But for me, the core thing  there is just moderation. I try to. I try to   spend as much time as I can moving more  and more of my computing to Daylight. Ben Greenfield: Yeah. And do you travel much? Anjan Katta: I travel a lot, yeah. For. Ben Greenfield: Are there certain things that you do   when you travel to mitigate light exposure because  you're in control of a lot less in that scenario? Anjan Katta: Yeah, it's really   tough when you're traveling. Oh, gosh. The  way hotels are lit and other people's houses  

and this and that. I have a little light  that I bring with me that I use as my,   like, I won't really turn on the  overhead lighting when I go to places,   and so I try to keep it pretty dark evening  onwards. And just use my little pocket light. Ben Greenfield: Yeah, I'm similar. I   have a little red light reading, you know, a  portable red light head reading light that I   can clip onto the nightstand. I use just a basic  cheapo headlamp that I got on Amazon. That's one   of the ones that can produce red light. And then I  wear blue light blocking glasses, and that's just   kind of how I jam. And then, of course, I'm sure  many people have heard about this, but the old,  

the hanger curtain trick, you grab a.  Do you know about this trick, Anjan? Anjan Katta: No. Ben Greenfield: You grab a hanger   from the coat closet in the Airbnb or the hotel or  whatever, you close the curtains. And you know how   there's always that annoying sliver of light that  comes through? And if you're staying in a city,   even at midnight, there's a bunch of light  pouring through from the artificial lights,   or maybe you've traveled, you  know, whatever, from east to west,   and it's lighter than what you want in the  morning. You can use that coat hanger to keep   the curtain way more shut and essentially turn it  into much more like the equivalent of a blackout   curtain. The last thing I do is I always have a  strip of black electrical tape in my backpack.   And you know how if you walk into a hotel room,  sometimes you turn off the lights and you realize,   oh, my gosh, things lit up like a Christmas  tree? Well, if I really want to optimize sleep,   I would literally just go cover up those  little lights with the electrical tape.

Anjan Katta: I think what's cool   to what you're pointing to is it's going to take  redesigning our entire environment. It's not just   going to be one aspect or one object. It's going  to be really thinking through everything from the   perspective of light, temperature, EMFs, water.  It's going to be refactoring everything. I think   it's fascinating to think about what are the other  categories? The way we wake up in the morning, the   type of alarms we use are the type of computers  and whiteboards and so on. Are we really all going   to go into VR and put that on our face? Is that  really our future? What's the alternative to that? Ben Greenfield: Exactly. It's crazy  

how many biohacking technologies arrive  at my house for me to try to have screens,   and they're super bright, but they're technology  meant to be used for relaxation or sleep. So it's   kind of funny because you can get just blue light  blocking Saran wrap off. Amazon kind of looks like   Christmas wrap. And I literally have almost every  screen in the house overlaid with that slightly   transparent blue light blocking red light, and  it kind of fixes it. But yes, it's shocking  

how many companies just design an amazing piece  of equipment that actually does work really well   and then just backlit the hell out of it. One  company who I just interviewed on the podcast,   Jasper, they're a standalone HEpa air  filtration company. They do a good job. Ben Greenfield: Like they have a button you push on it that's   dark mode, and you press it and let's say you have  one of those running in your bedroom and it goes   totally black. So now I look, you know, to know  if a company's thinking holistically, I look at a,   can you disable things like Wifi or Bluetooth  so that's not running constantly, particularly   if it's something near your head or while you're  asleep. And then secondarily, have they designed   a way to dim the screen or set it into dark  mode? And I think more people should be thinking   about that when it comes to the, you know, the  health of the technologies that we're using.

Anjan Katta: This is not how   anybody in tech really thinks about it. Like,  this is going to be a bottom up wave of us who   realize Maslow's hierarchy. Like, you need  your physical health and mental health and   nervous system health to build up of it. And  that's not how tech, you know, we're in the   middle of Silicon Valley. I went to Stanford.  I got to see kind of the belly of the beast.

Ben Greenfield: From a business standpoint,   this reflective screen technology. Let's say you  guys do a really good job of this and you hit   it out of the ballpark, and maybe you do come  out with a better phone or a computer monitor.   What's the likelihood that somebody like Apple or  Dell or some big computer company would acquire   you? Or is the cost of goods sold just monumental  for something like reflective screen technology? Anjan Katta: I think the way we think about   it is if you want to make healthier products, you  got to think about it holistically. So we don't   want to just innovate on one aspect of it and then  have somebody just slap it on. Like, how do we,   the natural materials that make up this, how do we  choose that? How do we have kill switches for Wi   Fi or Bluetooth? So I think our interest is not  just to kind of create a screen technology and   call it a day. It's to continuously keep reforming  computers to kind of be healthier and saner. Ben Greenfield: It's a very interesting   tap. I'm going to hold it up again and  again. A ton of functionality. I haven't  

even tapped into half of the things  this thing's capable of. It's called   the Daylight. I'll put a link to it and more  information in the show notes. If you go to   BenGreenfieldLife.com/daylightpodcast, I'll  include a few other helpful links there,   like the podcast I did with the guy who got  the concussion. I think I did one with the  

guy who invented the the Iris software as  well, if you want to check that one out. Ben Greenfield: And then all the   information about the Daylight computers,  I'll put over there as well. Anjan,   this has been super interesting. I've been  wanting to learn more about this weird   looking tablet ever since I got it, and you've  debriefed me pretty thoroughly. So thank you. Anjan Katta: Yeah, thanks for having me on. I hope   this is just the first innings for society and  reforming computers with AI, this is only going to   be more computer y things around us. Maybe they're  even trying to be in us and stuff like that.

Ben Greenfield: More computer y   things. Hooray. Well, I'm glad that in  about two weeks I'm just heading off in   the mountains to go elk hunting. So I'll  be away from all computers except maybe   a satellite phone for a while. So anyways,  though, the show notes folks are going to be   at BenGreenfieldlife.com/daylightpodcast. Check it  out. They're doing cool things. Spread the word. Ben Greenfield: And until next time, I'm Ben Greenfield   along with Anjan Katta, signing out from  bengreenfieldlife.com. Have an incredible week.

Ben Greenfield: Do you want free access to comprehensive show   notes, my weekly roundup newsletter, cutting edge  research and articles, top recommendations from me   for everything that you need to hack your life and  a whole lot more, check out bengreenfieldlife.com. Ben Greenfield: It's all there. Ben Greenfield: BenGreenfieldLife.com see you over there.   Most of you who listen don't subscribe like or  rate this show. If you're one of those people who.

Ben Greenfield: Do, then huge thank you. Ben Greenfield: But here's why it's   important to subscribe like and or rate this show.  If you do that, that means we get more eyeballs,   we get higher rankings, and the bigger  the Ben Greenfield Life Show gets,   the bigger and better the guests  get and the better the content. Ben Greenfield: I'm able to deliver to you. Ben Greenfield: So hit subscribe, leave a ranking, leave   a review. If you got a little extra time, it means  way more than you might think. Thank you so much.

2024-10-17

Show video