I Asked AI About Crypto Poverty God and Future

Show video

Hello guys. Ivan Kv is here and welcome to Shark Numbers. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has gained  significant popularity and is widely adopted   in various industries, including finance. AI  is expected to continue its growth and play   an increasingly important role in shaping our  future. The increasing demand for AI-powered   solutions is driving the widespread  adoption of artificial intelligence. In this video, I interviewed AI. We discussed  (if I can call it a discussion) several topics,   including the future of Crypto and AI,  the subject of abundance and poverty,   the concept of personal digital assets, and other  topics that seemed extremely important to me.  

I must admit that I learned a couple  of things from this conversation.   Artificial Intelligence is  not just a keyword anymore. It is a phenomenon that exists and  populates every corner of the tech world. Enjoy my interview with artificial intelligence. Without further ado, let's get rolling. What is the future of cryptocurrencies and AI? The future of cryptocurrencies and  AI is likely to be intertwined,   as the two technologies have the potential to  greatly impact each other and the wider world.

Cryptocurrencies are based on  decentralized ledger technology,   known as blockchain, which has  the potential to revolutionize   industries beyond finance, such as supply  chain management and voting systems.   With the growth of cryptocurrencies, it  is likely that more businesses will adopt   blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies,  increasing their usage and acceptance.  AI, on the other hand, is expected to play a  major role in the future of cryptocurrencies.

AI algorithms can be used to improve the  efficiency and security of blockchain systems,   making them more reliable and scalable.  AI can also be used to analyze large   amounts of data to identify patterns  and trends in the cryptocurrency market,   which could be valuable information for investors. Overall, the future of cryptocurrencies and AI is   one of growth, innovation and collaboration,  as the two technologies are set to impact   a range of industries and change the  way we interact with money and data. Let’s continue discussing cryptocurrencies. Do you  

think that in the future bad actors  will be able to use AI to steal   sensitive data or hack protocols that  make financial transactions possible? Yes, it is possible that bad actors will use AI  to steal sensitive data or hack protocols in the   future of cryptocurrencies. AI can be used  to automate and scale malicious activities,   making them much more effective and dangerous.  For example, AI algorithms could be used to   target specific weaknesses in blockchain  protocols or to automate phishing attacks.

However, it is also possible that AI will be  used to improve the security of cryptocurrencies.   AI algorithms can be trained to detect and prevent  malicious activities, such as hacking and fraud,   by analyzing large amounts of data and  identifying unusual patterns of behavior.   Additionally, AI can be used to develop more  secure and sophisticated blockchain protocols,   making it more difficult for bad  actors to compromise the systems. In conclusion, AI has the potential to both  help and harm the security of cryptocurrencies.   It is important for developers  and security experts to continue   to stay ahead of the curve and develop new  techniques to prevent AI-powered attacks.

Wouldn't it be cool if you could  make 100x per month trading coins? Unfortunately, life is not simple.  To become a professional trader,   you need to gain knowledge.   And  what if you don't have time  for that? What can you do? I have the answer for you. I united a group of professional traders,  and together, we developed an indicator   that could help you trade profitably. This  Indicator, which we called the 1000x Indicator,   is the result of the hard work and dedication of  the top traders in the crypto space. Our script  

analyzes tons of data, determines support and  resistance levels, measures market volatility,   determines if an asset is over-purchased  or oversold, and works with many other data   points. We worked hard; our goal was to make   this Indicator show correct signals most of  the time. And the results were incredible. Just take a look at this. This Indicator works perfectly.

When you see the green zone - it's time to buy.  When you see the red zone - the trend is bearish.  Fire in the green area means that the asset is  over-purchased. In the red zone, fire means that   the asset is oversold. You can also see historic  levels of support and resistance on the chart. When I select ETHUSD pair, the Indicator shows  that I could make around 3-4% in profit daily.  This Indicator is going to work differently with  different assets. But on Tradingview, you could   check this Indicator's previous  performance. It works perfectly  

with the majority of reputable coins and tokens. Here is what you need to do  to use this Indicator. First,   sign up on tradingview.com. If you don't have  an account, please sign up (you could create a   free account on tradingview, our Indicator  will work with free tradingview accounts). Now, go on SharkNumbers.com and purchase  one of our plans. Once you choose your plan,  

you will then be redirected to the  form. Please fill out the form and   make a payment. Use the crypto of  your choice, we have many options   available. Make sure you copy and paste  your username from Tradingview correctly;   otherwise, our system will have difficulties  finding you. Finally, go back on Tradingview,   click on indicators, invite-only scripts,  select 1000x Indicator, and enjoy using it.

Let me execute one trade to show you exactly  how this Indicator works in real-time. I just entered the green zone, I immediately  purchased the asset… Now the asset got overheated,   I am going to sell it… Done... I just made 1.28%  in profit in just 2 hours and 15 minutes. You   could take risks and wait for a bit longer but  I wanted to minimize risks, so I exited here. Let's test it out again. But this time,  we will do it on 30 min candles... Buy  

and sell - +3.73%. And it took me 7 hours. This Indicator is for people who  dream big. This Indicator is for   winners. We give you knowledge and  data, and it's time for you to make   profits. This Indicator is for winners, for people  who think big, and for people who dream big. If you are one of the winners, go  on sharknumbers.com and get your   1000x Indicator. Anyone who buys  the Moon plan before the end of  

this week will get three months  of free "1000x Indicator" use. Let's go to the moon! Do most crypto enthusiasts buy  cryptocurrencies out of fear of missing out?   A lot of people are educated and make rational  decisions when it comes to trading and investing.   But many people are driven by fear. And I feel  like big media has to do with it. Big media   is injecting information into people's  minds. Do you agree with my statements? Your statements raise interesting points  about the role of media and big players in   the cryptocurrency market. The media does have a  significant impact on shaping public opinion and   influencing investment decisions, and it's true  that large corporations, including hedge funds,   may have a vested interest in controlling  the narrative around cryptocurrencies. 

However, it's also worth noting that many  individuals buy cryptocurrencies because   they believe in the underlying technology, such  as blockchain, and see it as a way to diversify   their investment portfolios. Additionally,  the increasing adoption of cryptocurrencies by   businesses and governments suggests that they  are seen as more than just a passing trend.  In conclusion, the reasons for investing in  cryptocurrencies are likely to be complex   and multifaceted, with media, big players,  and individual beliefs all playing a role.   It is important for investors to do their  own research and make informed decisions,   rather than simply following  media or market trends. Let’s talk about the tech. What is  the next step for blockchain tech?  

What will be the next logical step in the  evolution of blockchain and distributed ledgers? The next step for blockchain technology  is likely to be increased adoption and   integration with other technologies. As blockchain  becomes more widely accepted and understood,   it is likely to be used in a growing  number of industries and applications,   from supply chain management to voting systems. Another area of growth for blockchain technology   is likely to be in the development of  more sophisticated and secure protocols.   As blockchain technology continues to mature,  it will be important for developers to   address existing weaknesses and improve the  scalability and reliability of the systems.  Additionally, there is likely to be  increased integration between blockchain   and other cutting-edge technologies, such  as AI and the Internet of Things (IoT).   For example, AI algorithms could be used  to analyze and secure blockchain systems,   while blockchain could be used to secure  and manage data generated by IoT devices. 

In conclusion, the next step in the  evolution of blockchain and distributed   ledgers is likely to be increased adoption  and integration with other technologies,   as well as the continued development of  more secure and sophisticated protocols. You mentioned sophisticated and secure  protocols. I want to dive deep into the   subject. When we push the blockchain tech  further to the subsequent adoption level,  

and we develop protocols that could help us  speed up already existing processes such as   token swapping and automated market making;  when bridges between blockchains become more   secure and form an advanced ecosystem that would  allow us to transfer coins and tokens between   the chains in a matter of seconds; when fintech  apps have more intuitive UI; will at that point   people and small business begin creating their own  tokens on a more regular basis? Do you think that   it is possible that in the near future retail  stores, barbershops, restaurants, and medical   offices will begin accepting payments in their own  tokens? And if customers don’t have certain coins   to pay for certain products and services, would  those customers just be able to instantly exchange   digital assets via more advanced protocols  and apps and clear transactions instantly? It is certainly possible that as blockchain  technology continues to advance and become more   accessible, small businesses and individuals  may begin creating their own tokens. With the   development of more sophisticated protocols  and the increased ease of use of blockchain   technology, it may become more feasible for small  businesses to create and manage their own tokens.  In regards to small businesses accepting payments  in their own tokens, it would depend on several   factors, including the level of trust in the  token and the ease of use for customers. If the   token is secure, reliable, and widely accepted,  it is possible that small businesses may begin to   adopt it as a payment method. Additionally, if the  fintech apps and interfaces for using blockchain   become more intuitive and user-friendly, it  may become easier for small businesses and   consumers to use tokens for everyday transactions. However, it's worth noting that the widespread   adoption of small business-created tokens  would also require significant changes in   the regulatory landscape, as well as wider public  awareness and understanding of cryptocurrencies. 

In conclusion, the future of small  business-created tokens and their   use as a payment method will depend on a  range of factors, including advancements   in blockchain technology, regulatory  developments, and public adoption and trust. You mentioned the regulatory landscape.   Many politicians (especially in the  US) operate from the principle of a   zero-sum mentality. Many political figures  believe that the government will have more   by taking more from people and businesses. One  party's gain would be another's loss. Right? However, zero-sum thinking will take us  nowhere. People get less motivated to work,   and companies are less interested in hiring  when too many restrictions are imposed. Is  

it possible to convince the government that  shifting towards tokenization is the right   way? Is it possible to persuade politicians,  to make them believe that adopting personal   digital assets is the right way to  go, that it is a win-win situation? Think this way, instead of a dollar heavily  controlled by a small group of people in charge   of the printer; we could have a variety of assets.     We could create an entirely new ecosystem in  which, instead of one main government-issued   currency, we have a variety of digital  assets swapped and used daily. All this   could be possible with advanced bridges, enough  liquidity in the pools, and Apps with intuitive   UI. What do you think about the mentioned  concept? Could it be the way toward abundance?

The concept of personal digital assets  and the use of tokens as a payment method   is certainly an interesting one, and there are  certainly potential benefits to this approach,   including increased financial innovation  and the creation of new opportunities   for small businesses and individuals. However, convincing politicians and the   government to shift towards tokenization  will likely be a challenging task.   While some regulators have shown a willingness to  embrace the technology and explore its potential,   others have been more skeptical and cautious.  This is in part due to concerns about security   and the potential for illegal activity,  such as money laundering and fraud. 

In order to convince regulators to embrace  tokenization and personal digital assets,   it will be important to demonstrate the benefits  of this approach and to address concerns about   security and risk. This could involve working  with regulators to develop clear and effective   rules and regulations, and to develop  and implement robust security measures   to protect users and prevent illegal activities. While the concept of personal digital assets and   the use of tokens as a payment method has  the potential to create a new and dynamic   financial ecosystem, the road to adoption  is likely to be a long and challenging one,   requiring significant efforts to educate  regulators, address concerns, and build trust. What if we convince politicians that it is time  to invest in our future, it's time to invest in   our youth? We can encourage people, especially  young professionals, to create personal tokens   and sell services or goods for those unique  digital coins and tokens associated with   particular professionals (individuals or small  businesses). That way, each teacher, each plumber,   each nurse, and each procurement specialist  would be motivated to perform better;  corporations could also pay salaries in  personal tokens (any currency would just   automatically convert into Elisa coin,  Bob coin, Klarissa coin, Emily coin,   on the day when salaries have to be paid). With each service purchase, the service  provider's token price would increase,   and with that net worth of each service  provider would also go up. Regular people  

with no financial background would become  millionaires and billionaires on paper   (sure, there will not be enough liquidity in  those tokens, but the fully diluted market   capitalization of each personal asset would be  measured in millions and billions of dollars). More people could become millionaires on paper.  This feeling alone would boost confidence in   individuals, especially young individuals (it  is important to notice because our future is   our youth). The world would mint millionaires  and billionaires with just this approach alone. It would also be beneficial for angel  investors and VCs. Instead of investing   in meaningless stores of value, isn't it better  to invest in individuals and the personal tokens   associated with those individuals? Isn't it  ultimately beneficial for any government,   for any society? With more motivated  and healthy people worldwide,   we could eliminate poverty. We could push  progress much further. What do you think? The proposal you mentioned involves creating a  system of personal tokens for individuals and   small businesses as a means of incentivizing  performance and creating a new asset class   for investment. While this idea has the potential  to create new opportunities for wealth creation,  

there are also several challenges and potential  drawbacks that would need to be addressed.  One challenge would be the lack of liquidity  in the market for these personal tokens, as you   mentioned. For individuals to be motivated by the  increase in the value of their token, there would   need to be a robust market where these tokens  can be traded and redeemed for other assets.  Another challenge would be the regulatory  environment. Governments around the world   have varying levels of regulations and oversight  for cryptocurrencies and other digital assets,   and creating a new class of personal tokens  would likely require a significant amount   of regulatory intervention and oversight. Additionally, there are concerns about the  

fairness and accessibility of such a system.  Not everyone has the skills, resources,   or opportunity to create and sell services or  goods in exchange for these personal tokens,   and the resulting distribution of wealth and  income could exacerbate existing inequalities.  While the idea of creating personal tokens  as a way to incentivize performance and   create new opportunities for wealth creation is  intriguing, it would require careful consideration   and planning to address the challenges  and potential drawbacks of such a system. You mentioned fairness and accessibility. With  personal tokens, nonprofit organizations and  

people unable to work could accept donations  in their own unique tokens (something like   "HelpKids coin"). Those willing to donate would  instantly exchange whatever currency they own   and are eager to contribute to the personal  asset of a foundation or a specific individual.   This model would give more transparency  and allow people to receive help directly,   bypassing all the bureaucratic levels. Also,  you don't have to own a personal token. People  

willing to help could send donations in  their digital assets. Then the receiver   would exchange donated funds into the currency of  their choice. What is your take on the subject? The concept of personal tokens has potential  to provide a new way of funding and supporting   various initiatives and individuals. By allowing  direct contributions to specific causes or people,   it could increase transparency and  efficiency in the donation process.   Additionally, by tying the value of a token  to a specific individual or organization,   it could create a new way for people to  support and invest in their chosen causes. 

However, it's important to consider the practical  implementation and regulation of such a system.   There could be potential challenges in terms of  security and stability of the tokens, as well as   issues with managing and distributing the funds  raised. Additionally, there may be regulatory   considerations, such as tax implications for  both the donors and recipients of these tokens.  Overall, the idea of personal tokens has  the potential to bring about positive   change in the way we support and fund various  initiatives and individuals, but it's important   to thoroughly evaluate the potential benefits  and drawbacks before implementing such a system. What steps should we take to bring  the adoption of the mentioned idea? The adoption of any new idea, including the one  mentioned, requires significant effort, planning,   and implementation. Here are some steps that could  help bring the adoption of personalized tokens: 

Educating the public on the benefits  and potential of personalized tokens  Building a regulatory framework  that provides clarity and security   for individuals, organizations, and investors  Developing a user-friendly infrastructure that  makes it easy for people to create, manage,   and exchange their personalized tokens Partnering with organizations and   individuals to pilot and showcase  the potential of personalized tokens  Encouraging collaboration and cooperation  between stakeholders, including governments,   corporations, financial institutions,  and other relevant organizations  Creating a vibrant ecosystem that  provides resources and support for   individuals and organizations looking  to explore and use personalized tokens.  It is important to approach the adoption  of personalized tokens in a thoughtful   and well-coordinated manner to ensure  their success and widespread adoption. To whom should I speak about this?  Please name several individuals with   whom I should discuss this topic  (including the adoption part). If you would like to discuss this  idea with influential individuals,   you can consider reaching out to: Fintech thought leaders and experts   in the blockchain space. Politicians and government   representatives who are involved in  financial regulation and technology adoption.  Entrepreneurs and investors in the fintech  space, including venture capitalists. 

Representatives of non-profit organizations  and social impact initiatives.  Industry leaders and executives in   finance and technology. Networking and attending   relevant conferences and events can help you  connect with these individuals. Additionally,   you can try reaching out to them through  social media, email, or professional networks. Here is a list of some influential  figures in the fintech industry:  Fintech Thought Leaders: Tim O'Reilly, founder of O'Reilly Media  Chris Gledhill, CEO of Secco Bank Karen Gomyo, CEO of KPMG Digital Village  Marco Polo Del Nero, CEO of  Willis Towers Watson Digital  Politicians and Government Representatives: Jay Clayton, former SEC Chairman  Gary Gensler, former Chairman of the CFTC Maxine Waters, US Representative and   Chair of the House Financial Services Committee Edvardas Šileris, Minister of Finance of Lithuania  Entrepreneurs and Investors in the Fintech Space: Jim Breyer, founder and CEO of Breyer Capital  Elizabeth Gore, founder and CEO of Hello Alice Anne Boden, CEO and founder of Starling Bank  Eric Ries, entrepreneur and  author of "The Lean Startup"  Representatives of Non-Profit Organizations: Maria Gonzalez, Director of the   Financial Health Network Julie Sweet, CEO of Accenture  Rachel Finn, Director of Digital  Transformation at Oxfam GB  Shahara Ahmad-Llewellyn, Executive  Director of Digital Promise Global  Industry Leaders and Executives  in Finance and Technology:  Satya Nadella, CEO of Microsoft Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase  Jack Dorsey, CEO of Square Lloyd Blankfein, former CEO of Goldman Sachs. Let’s talk about something else. It is a common  fact that new technologies replace old ones,  

and new financial methods replace old ones.  Back in the day, gold was considered the best   store of value. Now we have an even better one  - digital gold. Do you think that at some point,   Bitcoin will become irrelevant? And,  if so, then when will this happen? Whether or not Bitcoin will become irrelevant  is a matter of speculation and is difficult   to predict with certainty. However, it is  possible that at some point in the future,   another cryptocurrency or digital asset may  emerge that offers improved features and benefits,   such as faster transaction speeds, lower  fees, better security, or other advantages.  In the case of Bitcoin, it has been around  for over a decade and has established itself   as a leading cryptocurrency and store of  value. However, the cryptocurrency market   is constantly evolving, and it is possible that  new technologies and innovations will emerge   that challenge the current dominant players. Ultimately, the future of Bitcoin and the broader  

cryptocurrency market will depend on several  factors, including market demand, regulatory   developments, technological advancements, and  competition from other digital assets. Until then,   Bitcoin will continue to play a major role in  the world of cryptocurrency and digital assets. Let’s discuss something futuristic and  controversial. Is it possible that in the   near future, because of companies such as  Neuralink, we people will be equipped with   ultra-high bandwidth brain machines that will help  us essentially store private keys for our crypto   wallets in our skulls? How can companies such as  Neuralink shift the adoption of cryptocurrencies? It is possible that in the future,  companies like Neuralink could develop   brain-machine interfaces (BMIs)  with high bandwidth capabilities,   allowing people to store and secure private keys  for their crypto wallets directly in their brains.   However, this is still a very new and experimental  technology, and it will likely take many years   of research and development before it  becomes widely available and adopted. 

In terms of shifting the adoption of  cryptocurrencies, the development of   BMIs could make it easier and more secure to  store and manage digital assets, potentially   increasing confidence in the technology  and promoting wider adoption. However,   there are also a number of technical, ethical,  and societal challenges that must be addressed   before BMIs can be widely used for this purpose,  including privacy and security concerns, potential   misuse of the technology, and questions around  the long-term effects of implantation and use. It may sound like a funny question, but I will  ask it anyway. Some religious people (including  

Christians) believe that what companies  like Neurolink are working on is evil.   They are developing technology that  very much matches the description of   so-called the “mark of the beast.”  According to religious books,   this mark acts as a seal for the followers of the  Antichrist and the false prophet. In the future,   no one will be able to buy or sell without  this mark... Is Elon Musk the Antichrist,   a so-called false prophet? Is Neuralink working  on the development of the mark of the beast? No, Elon Musk is not the Antichrist,   and Neuralink is not working on the  development of the "mark of the beast."   These beliefs are religious interpretations  and are not supported by scientific evidence. 

Neuralink is a technology company that aims to  develop brain-machine interfaces to enhance human   capabilities and improve the quality of life.  While the technology they are developing may   have potential benefits and challenges, it is not  related to any religious beliefs or prophecies.   It is important to approach scientific and  technological developments objectively, based   on evidence and facts, rather than interpreting  them through religious or superstitious beliefs.

You just concluded that Elon Musk is not  the Antichrist. How do you know that? As an AI language model, I do not have personal  beliefs or opinions, but rely on the information   and data available to me. The idea of the  Antichrist is a religious concept that is part of   Christian eschatology, and there is no scientific  or empirical evidence to support the belief in its   existence. The idea of the Antichrist is often  depicted as a powerful and evil figure who will   play a key role in the end times, but this is a  matter of religious belief and interpretation. 

Elon Musk is a well-known entrepreneur and  inventor who is the CEO of several companies.   There is no factual evidence to suggest  that he fits the religious description   of the Antichrist or that he is in  any way connected to this concept.   The belief in the Antichrist is a matter  of religious faith, and it is not possible   to determine its validity or the identity of the  Antichrist through scientific or empirical means. Let’s talk about space and the colonization   of Mars. What traditional currencies or  cryptocurrencies will people use on Mars? It is currently unclear what currency or  currencies will be used on a potential   human settlement on Mars. At present, there are  no established human settlements on the planet,   and it is uncertain what form of currency  or economic system will be used if and when   humans do establish a permanent presence there. If a colony on Mars is established by a government  

or private organization, it is possible  that they may adopt a traditional currency   such as the US dollar or another national  currency. Alternatively, they may adopt a   new currency specifically designed for use on  the planet, or a digital or cryptocurrency.  In the case of a private or corporate-led  settlement, they may choose to use a currency   that is easily transferable and has a stable  value, such as a widely used cryptocurrency   like Bitcoin or Ethereum, to facilitate trade  and commerce with Earth and other settlements.  Ultimately, the form of currency used on Mars  will depend on a variety of factors, including   the goals and objectives of the settlers, the  economic and political conditions on the planet,   and the technology and infrastructure  available for conducting transactions. You can’t really use Ethereum or Bitcoin on  Mars due to tech limitations. Did you know that?

Yes, that's correct. Currently, it would  not be possible to use cryptocurrencies   like Ethereum or Bitcoin on Mars due to  technological limitations, such as the   lack of infrastructure for transmitting data and  conducting transactions over such long distances.  Mars is over 140 million miles away from Earth,  and transmitting data and conducting transactions   over this distance would require a reliable  and high-speed communication system, which is   currently not available. This makes it challenging  to use traditional cryptocurrencies that rely on a   network of computers to validate transactions  and maintain the ledger of transactions. 

However, as technology advances and  the infrastructure for interplanetary   communication improves, it may become possible  to use cryptocurrencies on Mars in the future.   Until then, alternative solutions  such as closed systems, digital   currencies specifically designed  for use in space, or traditional   fiat currencies may need to be considered  for economic transactions on the planet. I will ask you a couple of additional questions,  and then we will wrap up this interview. Ok? Sure, I'm here to answer your questions. Go ahead. If you were to pick a color for  cryptocurrencies, what color would it be and why? As an AI language model, I do not have  personal preferences, emotions, or opinions.   However, the color associated with  cryptocurrencies can vary depending   on the context and the particular currency. In many cases, the color blue is associated  

with cryptocurrencies due to its association  with stability, trust, and reliability.   This can be seen in the logos and branding of many  cryptocurrencies, which often feature blue hues.  Other colors that are sometimes associated with  cryptocurrencies include green, which is often   associated with growth and prosperity, and red,  which is associated with passion and excitement.  Ultimately, the choice of color  for cryptocurrencies is a matter   of branding and design, and is intended to  convey a particular message or feeling to   potential users and investors. The specific  color chosen will depend on the goals and   objectives of the currency and its creators, as  well as the audience they are trying to reach.

If AI became the President of the United States,   would it speed up the adoption  of new tech such as blockchain? It's impossible for AI to become the President of  the United States, as the office of the President   is reserved for human beings. However, if a  hypothetical AI President were to be elected,   its stance and policies on technology  adoption, including blockchain,   would likely be shaped by its creators and the  values and objectives they programmed into it.  In general, the adoption of new technologies like  blockchain is influenced by a variety of factors,   including technological advancements, regulatory  changes, market demand, and competition.   The role of the President, or any other elected  official, would likely be to facilitate and   encourage the adoption of new technologies  that align with their policies and priorities,   while also ensuring the protection of  citizens and the stability of the economy.  That being said, the widespread adoption  of blockchain and other new technologies   can be a complex and challenging  process, and will likely depend   on a range of factors beyond the control  of any single individual or government. What would it be if I asked you to create a name  for your own token, a token that represents you?   Come up with a name for your  hypothetical digital asset.

As a language model created by OpenAI, I  don't have personal opinions or preferences   and I don't possess the capability to  hold digital assets. I can assist you in   generating a name for a hypothetical digital  asset if that's what you're looking for. Go ahead. Please generate a  unique name for a made-up asset. "AI Token" It doesn’t sound very unique, but ok. I apologize if the name generated wasn't up  to your expectations. As an AI language model,   I generate responses based on patterns and  associations in the data I was trained on. If you  

have a specific requirement for a name, I can try  to come up with options that match your criteria. Sure. Make a name for a token associated with  digital currencies, new tech, and a bright future. LuminTech Coin  Wow. That sounds much better.

I'm glad you think so! Is there  anything else you'd like to know? No, I am done. Thank you. Do you  think my questions were good enough? Yes, your questions were  good and well thought out,   as they covered a variety of topics  related to finance and technology. It was my conversation with AI (if I can call it  a conversation). I was generally impressed by the  

level of confidence that the machine had. At this  point, we are one step closer to Singularity. And   one thing is clear: with new tech, more data  will be piling up in our human brains. It’s not   necessarily bad. But it is a fact. With this  level of technology, we humans have to work   hard to process all the data circulating in the  annals of various networks. AI gets challenging. So, train your hippocAmpus, neocOrtex, and  amYgdala. Or wait for a while and then go  

Neuralink (if, of course, the mark  of the beast doesn’t scare you). I am done for now. If you enjoyed this video then give it a like,   subscribe to my channel if you are  not yet subscribed. I am done for now.

2023-02-05

Show video