Betting on Tesla & the Power of Disruptive Technology w/ Christopher Tsai (RWH045)

Betting on Tesla & the Power of Disruptive Technology w/ Christopher Tsai (RWH045)

Show Video

(00:00) the way I have minimized the chance of  selling great compounding machines too early   is to have a fair number of positions so I'm very  concentrated with respect to how most people would   think about the portfolio but I'm also pretty  diversified with respect to some other managers so   we have about 21 holdings today if I had all of my  money in one stock it's going to be a lot harder   to not interrupt the compounding process than it  would be if you had 21 companies hi everyone I'm   very happy to be here today with Christopher Tsai (00:40) Christopher is the president and chief   investment officer of Tsai Capital he's a  prominent art collector um good friend and   a wonderful human being Christopher it's lovely  to see you thanks so much for speaking with us   William it is so wonderful to see you we've had  wonderful memorable open conversation in the past   and it's just a privilege for me to be here with  you I'm so grateful for this time with you William   nice to see you thank you I'm really delighted  to be doing this I wanted to stop by asking  (01:12) you about your family because you have  this fascinating family background including an   immensely successful father Gerald Tsai who was  a famous iconic investor and a a a CEO but it's   extraordinary I think what your family actually  went through that led you to be here today in   the US and I wanted to start really by asking you  about your family's tumultuous experience in China   and what your grandmother Ruth lived through and  how you all end it up here well that's a that's a   long long history um it was very fortunate for my (01:49) grandmother her name was Ruth she gave a   speech to her church when she finally made it over  to America she lived in Scarsdale New York and the   title of her speech was reminisces of her time  in Hong Kong China in the United States without   that speech I would not have known as much as  I know today what I know is as you alluded to   my grandmother and my grandfather went through  a lot to get my father to America his sister   to America and I'm truly grateful for all the  sacrifices that they made to give you a couple of  (02:39) examples it was I guess in the late  1930s when Japanese troops took over Northern   China my grandmother really wanted to get my  father out of the country and it wasn't easy   it was wasn't wasn't easy to get an exit view  up nobody knows this but she forged my father's   passport so he was born in 1929 and somehow she  made the nine look like an eight got him out of   the country one year early um but it wasn't an  easy process and she needed money as well to help   pay for the tuition so she started Trad tring real (03:31) estate because you didn't need a license   at the time apparently to trade real estate  and she was fairly well connected from what I   understand so she started in that area she made  some money traded real estate eventually became   um a Trader of stocks bonds and commodities on  the Shanghai stock exchange she was a Pioneer   in the sense because she was the first woman to  trade on the floor of the Shanghai stock exchange   this was all happening when um various  International concessions in China were being   formed so there was the um the Dutch settlement (04:12) the Portuguese settlement the Italian   settlement the British settlement and in order to  keep my uh father and his sister in school they   had to move around from different settlements  so it's hard for us I think to understand that   but from what I've read in this spe speech  was that it was incredibly humiliating to be   forced to move around within your own country  then you know after she had accumulated some   money she bought a farm in um in China  not far from from Shanghai I believe in   in sucho and one night there was a knock on (04:54) the door and the was the Communist   authorities and communist authorities said you  have uh like a an a night to vacate a day to   vacate the property we're confiscating your  land so she was stripped of her possessions   after she had accumulated money and she had to  kind of start from scratch so they went through   a lot and um my grandmother and my grandfather  were separated for multiple periods of like 10   years each uh she was separated from her her  children once the kids made it over to America   so it's a long long long history of um (05:35) separation of being interrogated   by Chinese authorities she had this kind of  connection with America because uh her husband   Gerald Tsai not my father but my father's father  Joe side worked for Fort Motor Company so there   was already this connection uh to an American  company then my father went over to uh the states   and so Grandma Ruth was then interroga ated  for three hours a day for over a year by the   communist authorities it was a little whole whole  ordeal and needless to say like when everybody   was eventually reunited uh it was a just a (06:13) joyous joyous occasion and that was   years years later it was an extraordinarily  intense time I I I was reading about it the   other day and there there was this period I  guess of two and a half three years where your   grandmother Ruth was trading stocks and gold and  other Commodities on the stock exchange and then   basically the the Japanese invaded the Shanghai  International settlement which was kind of an   autonomous region at the time I guess it was  it was more or less controlled by the British   and the Americans uh and so even though the (06:47) Japanese had occupied Shanghai a few   years earlier in 1937 you'd had this kind of Oasis  where you could just about live normally and then   and then trading just gets halted completely  and so it's a fascinating example where you   you realize when you study history just how  tumultuous things are just how much we're   subject to uncertainty and change in every era and  I was wondering how that sense of your family's   history the sense of of uncertainty the sense of  external circumstances that can come up and and  (07:25) and ruin markets ruin economies OB  seat families overturn everything how that's   affected your view of uh of the world of Life  of how to invest well a couple things on that   so it's important to remember my father was  born 1929 and this was all happening when he   was roughly 10 years old right so he was old  enough to remember that you know if you're   born in tumultuous times and you're too young  you're not going to remember certain things   he was old enough to remember remember that  and consequently he was old enough to talk  (08:05) to me when I was a teenager about his  life in China of course growing up in a much   more privileged stable environment even today  like I'm not able to fully grasp what he spoke   about but I think I have enough knowledge to  understand that my grandfather my grandmother   my father they've made Extreme sacrifices  to allow me to live the kind of life that   I'm living today uh where I'm wasn't uprooted in  my childhood I wasn't forced to move from home   to home I didn't have to worry about a bomb (08:50) dropping or what was going to happen   I wasn't cut off from from the news I wasn't  cut off from my friends right so I'm totally   grateful for for the everything that they've done  for me and and I understand like how hard it was   for them to create that initial kind of plot of  capital that allowed the whole family to kind   of do what they what what it's what it's done  and this idea of like Capital preservation it   was instilled in me very early like how important  it is to preserve Capital um and we can talk like  (09:34) a lot about preservation of capital and  compounding and the importance of you know um not   having to go back to go um in life and in in in  with not just your life but with money but this   idea of capital preservation was instilled in me  at a very very early age and and and and certainly   through these stories that my father uh told me  about his life growing up and the difficulties   that him and his mother and and father faced  I thought it was fascinating also as I started   your family's story to realize how incredibly (10:07) adaptable they had to be so there there   was this amazing story that you've told before  about what your what your grandmother did for   example with the top soil in the farm where  can you tell that because it it's such a it's   such an interesting example of how um feisty  and formidable and resource ful she had to be   really to get you in this position that you're  in today yeah totally um one quick story before   we talk about the top soil story and I actually  just learned about it today I must have read it  (10:43) before but as I Was preparing for  our talk I was reading this speech that I   had mentioned that my grandmother gave and um I  came across a little section about how when she   was just a child you know she really wanted to to  go to boarding school and get because the boarding   schools were the best schools in in in Shanghai  around Shanghai at the time but her parents didn't   want her to go and her grandmother said to her  that um um if you're too educated you'll never   find a man you know can can you believe like (11:24) how different the times were then but   she fought to go to boarding school and how did  she do that she locked herself in her room and   refused to eat until she was given the okay  wow so this kind of feisty oh and and and she   she she got her way and she wound up going  to the same school that Madame uh shankai   Sheek uh went to the very prestigious School  in in China but that kind of feisty mentality   uh stayed with her so to the top soil story so  the Chinese authorities knock on the door one   night they say you know you have to vacate the (12:06) the property that she had been saving   up to buy for years the most valuable part of the  land is the top soil so she didn't put up a fight   with the authorities she said she'll do as she's  asked but what she also did was that the night   before they they they uh were going to confiscate  the property she hired a bunch of guys to strip   all the soil off the top soil and sell it so she  could recoup some of her investment and um this   nobody knows but um apparently she took that money  she bought jewelry which she eventually put in her  (12:55) hair when she left from China and event  got her exit visa to go to Hong Kong so she was   able to take the money the money with her to  Hong Kong amazing amazing and you spent a fair   amount of time with her as a child right because  she died at 93 so I was wondering what when you   look back on the influence that she had on you and  the things she taught to to you as a kid is there   anything that you've carried forward with you  that's been helpful to you either as an investor   or in life beyond investing not that there is life (13:30) beyond investing well she was a great cook   and I must have been maybe like 10 or 10 years  old or something like that maybe even younger   and I'm sitting around her she lived in  a very modest apartment by the way like   she could have had any home she wanted my father  had already made plenty of money by the time she   was living in Scarsdale but she chose to stay in  her modest apartment in Scarsdale um as actually   part of the projects they weren't like the  the worst apartments in the world but they   were part of the projects I was there many (14:06) many times so I'm sitting at this her   little dining table and uh it's a a square  one and she was making some of my favorite   dishes um and she looked at me and she said you  know look at this table I should have bought   a round table she said in life why be a square  table when you can be round one she was talking   about I think what I mean she intuitively knew  Dale Carnegie right she knew how to deal with   people she knew that it didn't make sense  to be abrasive and that kind of mentality   that understanding of how to deal with people (14:56) actually helped her get her exit Visa   so just a quick example when she was being  interrogated I mentioned earlier that she   was being interrogated for like 3 hours a  day for about a year from what I understand   well one day the uh one of the guys in the room  apparently said you know there there are rumors   about the Chinese children not having access  to food what do you think about that and so she   pulls out photos of her plump grandchildren and  she says look at my look at my children I sorry   her her children look at my children do they (15:29) look skinny to you and apparently   they shut up huh so she was very good with  people and that lesson about you know why   be a a square table when you can be around  one the lessons of Dale Carnegie and how   to Wi friends and influence people I think  they're all very good lessons to you know   appropriate and apply it in one's own life  so she's was totally influential to me and   and how I think about you know dealing with  intera in with building relationships with   people she also had a huge impact obviously on (16:04) your father Gerald s Jr and I I wanted   to talk about him in some dep because he's such  a fascinating figure and for for people who don't   know just a brief snapshot of him he he was born  in 1929 as Christopher said and died in 2008 he   was the first Chinese American to become  the CEO of a Dow Jones Industrial Average   company and he did things like he bought Smith  Bond and changed the name to Primerica turned   it into a financial services JN that was  sold to Sandy W who eventually turned it   into City group but I'm actually so he did (16:38) over a hundred deals I remember   Christopher telling me once but I'm most  interested actually in his investment career   that ended sort of his public investing career  I guess ended relatively early probably in his   early 30s but he was such an iconic legendary  figure and in some ways with sort of the Kathy   Wood of his time um and so both both the  good and the bad I mean it's like a really   complex interesting Nuance story can you tell  us about his investment career and how he came   to be in some ways the first celebrity fund (17:10) manager in the country I think yeah I   mean it's it's hard to think about like real  celebrity fund managers today uh to the same   degree I mean he had apparently like articles  I think it was in the cover of of business week   he was in Newsweek uh the Press spoke about  him as this kind of celebrity figure he had   a ponytail by the way oh so uh he had his  he had kind of crafted his own image um his   bit of a of of a bad boy within the world of  fund management because you have to understand   back then uh you know the institutions the (17:53) Pension funds the trust Departments   of banks were super super super conservative  I mean their their their kind of focus was   on electric utility companies gas companies  railroads you know very very stable kinds of   businesses and here my father comes in and he um  focuses almost entirely on growth companies and   the way he trades them was unique so there's a guy  by uh uh one of his close friends was John rosenal   um John rosenal was vice chair of be  Sterns he's currently Vice chair of JP   Morgan uh I'm still in touch with John (18:39) today John spoke at my father's   funeral uh but John and my father did the  first real block trades so they would go in   and they would buy uh huge blocks of these growth  companies and really really move markets and when   news got out that uh that my was moving into  one particular company these companies would   would soar and conversely when he news got  out that he might be selling these stocks   would would plummet so he he really moved markets  and he shook up this institutional conservative   mindset about investing just in kind of (19:20) utility companies and more stable   um more established businesses and he did that  at it capital fund first so Edward Johnson Senior   um gave my father when he was I think 29 or  so around that time the role of running the   Fidelity Capital fund Fidelity Investments was  pretty small at that time maybe like I don't   know the exact figure but I'm guessing maybe  50 million 100 million in AUM something like   that compared to maybe four and a half trillion  today so this is really early right this is so   he I mean Chris Christopher's dad basically (20:00) leaves Boston University um where his   parents had sent him and and joins Fidelity  in 1952 as an analyst and then it starts this   aggressive growth fund that Christopher mentioned  the fidelty capital fund at the age of about 29   and it's tinier it's like $12 million and  then grows to 340 million and he becomes   the president of fidelity and then basically  leaves Fidelity around 1965 and launches a   thing called The Manhattan fund I think with  encouraging from Ruth and so this is kind of   at the peak of the bull market can you tell us (20:33) what happens cuz in a way it's like it's   it's a sort of really important emblem of the  go- go years that were not dissimilar I guess   to the late 90s when you and I were starting  to become fascinated by investing actually you   were fascinated by it from Bas basically the  womb but when I was getting fascinated by it   in the late 90s yeah so tell us the context  of what what happened to your dad at the   Manhattan fund well before we get to Manhattan  fund just quickly so why did he leave fit   that that was always a question that I (21:02) had for him because from what I   understand he was a 25% owner of fidelity  wow which you know back then when they had   500 million under management sounds it's it's  less impressive than it is now right but um he   wanted the the top role and Ed Johnson the  you know senior uh was he he approached Ed   Johnson and Ed Johnson said you're never  going to have the top role because my son   Ned is going to take over that's that's what I  understand to have transpired and you mentioned   my grandmother being influential in these (21:35) decisions and he spoke to his mother   about almost every decision that he made these  100 plus deals particularly this this role at   Fidelity and my dad always wanted to to to run the  show and so that's really why he left plus he had   circled the country I mean countless times going  to all these Regional broker dealers traveling   to you know hundreds and of cities building his  reputation while he was at Fidelity getting to   know all the Brokers and broker dealers throughout  the country so when he was ready to leave  (22:17) Fidelity to start his own thing he had  already the kind of network so he leaves Fidelity   launches Manhattan F and so as you're driving  into Manhattan today you go over the um the tri   B Bridge onto um just before the FDR which is  now renamed um and there's a big billboard and   and and um and you know these big Billboards  that align the highway so my father had that   big big billboard as you come in from when I was  sing he had you know advertisements from a patent   fund and he advertised all over the place so (22:59) the advertisements plus his relationships   allowed Manhattan fund to launch with a huge  amount of capital so they launched um with about   250 million of capital which was multiples of what  he expected to raise and was the most successful   offering in American mutual fund history at  the time so he launched his Manhattan fund   after a great performance record at Fidelity  into a bull market um and he was always very   good at timing his purchases and sales  whether that be skill whether it be luck   whether it would be uh whether it was a (23:50) combination of both which   probably was a combination of both um  regardless he was very good at that   and more Capital flew into the fund and he  decided to exit by selling the management   company which was s Management and research that  was a management company from Manhattan fund he   sold it to uh CNA Financial right at the top of  the market and of course we know what happens   afterwards there were other momentum types of  managers because he gets labeled with the momentum   crowd the two Freds the Fred Carr um and and they (24:37) they disappeared but my father was unique   in the sense that he took his um capital from  the sale and he went into an entirely different   direction which was building businesses but  the the the reputation kind of dogged him in   a way that obviously kind of plagued him and I  I wanted to read something by one of my favorite   writers um this is Joe Nera who when when I  was a young journalist I before I would write   a feature story a long magazine feature story  my ritual was always to read stories that Joe   had written for Fortune because I could kind (25:15) of get in my mind oh here's how a good   story is written so he was sort of my model  of a great magazine writer um in my late 20s   and early 30s and he actually edited um a a  sort eight or nine page profile Bill Miller   that I did uh for Fortune back in about 2001  and um so when your father died in 2008 um The   New York Times always does this annual feature  about basically the greatest people who died   that year and so Joe was brought in to write  a piece called The Goo investor and he talked   about your father as this symbol of an (25:51) era the great goo years of the   1960 bll market and he he described him  as becoming this symbol in much the same   way that Michael milim became the symbol of the  junk bond fueled excesses of the 1980s and Henry   blet the symbol of the internet bubble and then  he talked about how basically from between 1958   to 65 your dad had was on this incredible  hot streak and I'm just going to read you   a few sentences he says people were dazzled by his  swashbuckling fores into the glamour stocks of the   day like Polaroid and LTV which seemed only to go (26:24) up and up and his seeming ability to time   the Market's every move it was a beautiful thing  to watch his reactions Edward Johnson then the F   owner of fidelity said what Grace what timing  glorious nobody had ever run a fund like that   before and the press in particular portrayed him  as an investing genius Gerald s Jr wrote Newsweek   at the height of his Fame radiates total cool he  was the first fund manager to receive celebrity   treatment in the Press which probably made what  happen next inevitable after dazzling 1965 set SII  (26:56) set out on his own seeking to raise 25  million for his new Manhattan fund he wound up   with 10 times the amount his investors clamored  to get into the fund Etc and so then he says um   that in these books by people like John Brooks  and Adam Smith who are both these Legends after   your dad's fund had gone down 90% he said Sai  was a figure of scorn in their books he says   Brooks in particular portrayed size fall as a  kind of deserved come up and for his investing   style a metaphor for the excesses of the  age little did the authors realize that  (27:25) one day thousands of mutual fund and hedge  fund manag with copy size investing strategies   buying hot stocks primarily because they were  going up which works in good times but not in   bad ones only they called it momentum investing  so it's just wondering what what do you think   what what what does that raise both in terms of  your sense of unfairness or or fairness or any   other thoughts that you have let me first start  with the side that would be most favorable to my   father and then I'll I'll give you (27:56) another perspective   um from what I understand that is that my  father stopped managing that fund um he   was he was still the the management company  was still involved um it was the sale wasn't   completed but my father had stepped back from  the portfolio management of of that fund and all   of his friends who were in that fund had left so  when my father announced the the sale all of his   friends like blar Tish who became my sister's  Godfather and Harold Janine who eventually ran   it and um all these brilliant businessmen who (28:45) were invested with my father immediately   left so unfortunately yeah the the public lost  whatever was 90% or uh and I spoke to my father   about that and says well the number was less  than that because there was a dividend and   but regardless it's you know it's it's it's it's  it's a lot of money and the reason why they lost   that is because um underpinning these Investments  that were in the fund like Polaroid and LTV as you   mentioned um had probably you know very little  intrinsic value relative to the market value of  (29:25) the holding so um his approach was very  much uh momentum B based as you as you said uh   it's certainly not my Approach and but um you  have to also keep in mind that look this was   a very now I'm trying to be fair to him this was  a very um small part a small but meaningful part   of his career in other words these 10 or so years  in fund management it at Fidel at Manhattan fund   maybe a few more than 10 years but not that many  more than 10 years that allowed him uh he was   smart enough to capitalize that he was early (30:09) to this kind of momentum trade he was   smart enough to raise a fund raise $250 million  and during the period when the commissions by the   way the load was like six s or 8% or something  like you know something huge like that so they   just raped in this money the management company  sign management research was extremely Prof   profitable he was able to sell that for something  like 30 million dollar from what I understand   in present value terms that's a lot of money  right and he used that as the seed Capital to  (30:46) do everything else that he he did in  life it was a small part of his career but a very   meaningful one in terms of uh being able to have  that seed Capital now to go on and do many many   more things it's also just so interesting in  terms of your your own life because in some   ways you're totally different from that as an  investor and so I'm really interested in we'll   talk more about your investing philosophy but  I'm really interested in in the similarities   and differences because in some ways I mean (31:17) I remember your father talking about   how he had this fairly concentrated group of  of very high quality growth stocks but then he   he wants it to you you know something about um you  know you shouldn't feel like you have to stay with   a stock it's like a wife you know you don't have  to stay uh and so he wasn't um you know he didn't   have the long-term perspective that you have but  he also did have a respect for quality and so can   you just talk about how having this background of  this father who is an extraordinary and kind of  (31:52) iconic figure shaped your own investing  philosophy yeah I mean it's is the more I realize   in life like people are full of contradictions  right they're just full of full of contradictions   and they say one thing they behave another  way what I learned very early because I I did   work for my father in my teens and which he was  probably one of the hardest bosses I had I had two   internships one with Mario gabelli one with John  Levan who was a partner with Michael steinhardt   those were tough bosses and and I'm still in (32:29) touch with them today and but my   father was a really tough boss and um I was  looking at a company once and he you know I   was it was a Medical Products company and he  said you know do some research come back to   me let's talk about it in those days you  know you couldn't just go online and just   download everything at least I didn't have that  access so you call up the company i' get the 10   Q's the 10ks do all my research I came back to  him like couple Weeks Later three weeks later   and I said I really like this idea we should (33:03) we should buy some for the foundation   because I was help I was involved with his  foundation and on the investment side and   he said don't don't worry about that I sold  that stock already so he had already bought   some which I did not know and then he already  had sold it so I realized that this is like   this is not the way I want to think about  investing uh and I learned that very early   that is not the way I want to think about  investing that is not the way I want to spend my   time in my life and fortunately I was reading Ben (33:37) Graham and Peter Lynch and Phil Fisher and   a bunch of other you know invest books by other  managers and I just gravitated to call it the   world of value investing and so we went in very  very different ways but to answer your question   like I learned some very very important things  from him I learned not to dismiss a company's a   company as a potential investment just because on  the surface its valuation looks expensive the best   um Investments that he's made in his life and  most of the money by the way he's made in Deal  (34:21) making so I think that probably the public  doesn't really understand that but most of the   money that he's made uh was in dealmaking I think  that if I looked at his his trades in in publicly   traded equities not so good uh but he was involved  early in some private companies that became public   and then he wound up holding them for very long  periods of time because he was friends with the   the founder and the CEO and he just would not sell  something that he was close to the the COO so that   kind of forced him to you know stick with these (34:56) Holdings and I can give a bunch of   examples but he made most of his money in  these private deals I just wanted to stop   stop you there because there such an interesting  thing it's a little bit like um the realization   that we often talk about that Ben Graham the the  you know the patron saint of value investing and   buying cheap as Charlie Munga would often point  out made much of his money off Geico a really high   quality stock and it's really interesting here  that I just wanted to to pause and Ponder the  (35:27) fact that that Gerald junor the great  icon of momentum investing actually made much   of his money from investing in businesses and  then sticking with them for like what do you   make of that it's such an interesting Insight like  I said people are full of of contradictions and so   Ben Graham was you know preaches diversification  to students and yet he's highly concentrated in   Geico personally right um the the businesses  that um my father made money on were again   the private ones that became public or in in (36:04) Deal making he made money there and he   made a lot of money I mean not relative  to the whole to the whole pie but he he   did very very well in real estate and in art  incidentally like really really well in art   what I learned from all of that if I look at his  mistakes and successes I learned a couple things   uh the first is most of the money he's made by  holding on to things the momentum trading that   he was known for in in public equities and  number two he made most of his money buying   quality like quality is is was was very very (36:42) important to his success and that's   something I've I've taken from him and  I truly believe like the environment   in which you grow up dictates the kind of  person and mentality you will have in life   so let me just quickly expand on that if  you grow up during the Great Depression   I would presume you're you're focus on  saving every penny and looking for cheap   cheap cheap and I think I'm just taking  a guess that you're going to be much more   focused on buying cigar butts in life then you (37:24) might be on buying the highest quality   um asset you can find and maybe paying up for it  um somehow my father figured out that the real   money is in the best businesses and the higher  quality assets and he instilled that in me very   early and sometimes these things look expensive  and so my point earlier is that he taught me   very early not to dismiss something um that might  look expensive on the surface before you do the   Deep work and really understand what you're buying  and what it's worth and the problem that a lot of  (38:11) value investors have I think is that they  all screen they all screen for low P ratios High   dividend yields you know low EV uh cash flows what  whatever it is they're screening and they will   Miss because the the the kind of any value in  that area is can get competed away and so I'm   more interested in businesses that uh might look  expensive on the surface but actually aren't and   you have to be careful because a lot actually are  expensive right and there's no margin safety there   but there is Peter Kaufman said there is (38:53) um there's margin where there's   mystery I I think that's so true there's margin  where there's mystery and so sometimes the best   investments are those that are misunderstood and  might appear expensive and they're often quality   kinds of businesses so I gravitate toward  quality partly as a result of that influence   he had on me if that makes sense so so let's  jettison about four pages of my questions for   you and go straight to Tesla which is really an  important embodiment of of this and illustration  (39:28) of this and tesra when when we were  hanging out in Switzerland a couple of months   ago was your largest position and your highest  conviction idea and uh had gone up about sixfold   since you bought it can you talk about how  Tesla is in some ways a perfect illustration   of what you do that it's it's something that maybe  looked expensive has been regarded as overpriced   by a lot of people it's been a favorite of short  Sellers and you looked at it and thought actually   no and this is much more dis disruptive Than (40:02) People realize it's a much it's got much   broader potential Than People realize it's much  more than a car company it illustrates so much in   the way that you do things but if you could so  so yeah let let rip tell us tell us what Tesla   Illustrated about for a start something that that  seemed expensive on the surface but actually maybe   wasn't I wish I were smart smarter than I you know  I wish I were smart in the sense that I think that   I was late to Tesla um I started looking at the  company in 2018 or so uh that had this huge huge  (40:42) runup as it it turned profitable in 20  uh end of 2019 and so I missed this runup uh was   interesting to me for a lot of reasons which  I'll get into uh but then we had this covid   selloff in February or we had a selloff the stock  in February 2020 that's when we took our initial   position we our average I think is about $41. (41:06) 66 a share so we've we've done very   well uh since that time but I think it's it's  early Innings and I could totally be wrong but   I think that this company is is definitely uh  one of the most most misunderstood companies   that I've I've seen in my 25 years or so of  managing money for others it's it's such an   interesting um company and it and it's it's so  misunderstood and I think it's misunderstood   for uh a few reasons one you have this kind  of overarching personality where people start   to formulate opinions based on what Elon is (41:42) is is has decided to say during the   day um they people think about it as a as a as a  car company um and we can talk about that I don't   think fundamentally that it it is and that  might seem like a this crazy statement but   I'll I'll get into that and third it is a um most  people haven't actually dived in right they've not   spent the hundreds and hundreds of hours on this  company and they haven't um really gone through   the financials to understand the the economics  of the business so there are few things coming  (42:24) together where I think that this this  company still remain misunderstood but there's a   reason why it's up whatever 15,000 or so since the  IPO and there is a reason why it continues to go   higher uh over time and because there are plenty  of people that do get it right and that it's it's   just getting more and more concentrated into what  I would probably call um hands of smart money   but um again I I could be wrong but the market  seems to to agree that this is something very   special so let let's break this down a little bit (43:02) so sure one thing that you've said is that   the Skeptics and critics and the short Sellers and  the like fail to understand that it's really not   just an electric vehicle company so what is it and  I'm I'm agnostic about all of this I'm just I'm   just unpacking this I I don't have a um a dog in  this race I'd say it's not just a car company it   is very much an EV company but it's not just a car  company so let me give you the framework or let me   let me explain the the framework that I use at (43:33) least to uh rationalize my decision to   be invested whether whether right or wrong  in the early 1900s um you know there's this   ice vehicle Henry Fort comes out 1908 with the  with the the Model T and um people were really   really skeptical about the Model T there  was a magazine called Carriage monthly and   editor-in chief of carriage monthly which was  like the this was a very popular magazine at the   time the editor and chief said that human  beings have been carried by beasts by for   thousands of years why would the future look any (44:10) different and of course it it it did um   why were people skeptical well there were no  paav roads Supply chains were very limited   there were very few fueling stations there  was very little Manufacturing capacity kind   of sound familiar right to today in EV terms um  but ice Vehicles Henry Ford disrupted the horse   and carriage very quickly within 20 years which is  happens to be pretty much the time frame um during   which SC curves take formation is a 20-year  disruption period uh with respect to pretty   much all these transformational Technologies (44:56) going back to the guten per printing   press and the steam engine and the spinning  wheel it's all about 20 years so my point is   that there's all of this skepticism and you  had horse and carriage competing against this   noisy ice vehicle both were forms of  transportation both got you from point   A to point B but one was fundamentally  different it was fundamentally different   because it was a much more efficient um process  of getting you from point A to point B and that   is the lens um from a kind of very high top (45:38) down level that I look at Tesla and   electric vehicles in general they're just a much  more efficient way to get you from point A to   point B than ice vehicles and what I mean by that  is the cost of ownership and cost per mile is just   much lower and so then it's a question of what are  the risks what are the competitive advantages does   Tesla have over the rest of uh the competition  in EV and how will Tesla um survive and thrive   the ice vehicles are going the way of the dinosaur  that that is a big assumption that I believe is is  (46:21) true because I think that EV adoption is  following the traditional s-curve adoption phase   and there's not a lot of time left for um for ice  vehicles to to exist so you've written a lot in   the last couple of years about disruption can you  talk a little bit about why why in a way we just   have trouble as humans understanding disruptive  companies it's an evolutionary um issue that   we all we all have um because evolutionarily  our brains are wired to think in linear   terms they're not designed to think in (47:10) um exponential terms which is how   disruptive um Innovations and Technologies  take their for as as an esur and so there's   typically in in any disruptive technology again  going back to um the you can go back to the   printing press you can look at the spinning  wheel and the steam engine the adoption of   um cable uh the adoption of ice Vehicles right  the adoption of cable the adoption of streaming   they've all happened within roughly a 20-year  period And by all happened I mean they've gone   to 90% adoption so typically you start out (47:54) pretty slowly and then um there's a   Tipping Point where this s-curve formation really  takes the exponential um component of the s- curve   takes place and there's just massive very very  fast widespread adoption and our brains are not   uh wired to think like that and that's another  reason why we can't understand the power of   compounding like we have to sit down and actually  take the calculator out and we can do the math and   we can do the math and look at look what happens  if you put $1 in have $630 today so you have 630  (48:29) times your money in 66 years like it's  and that's 10% compounded so we just don't think   like that I think the same thing is happening  with um the adoption of of electric vehicles   when you and I had dinner in clusters uh  in Switzerland at the value X event that   that gu spear hosted a couple of months ago um I  remember at one point you mentioning the without   Marcel PR who's my favorite writer probably you  might actually not have invested in Tesla and   it's a it's an unusual comment that was perfectly (49:06) designed to Peak my interest and approval   tell us why what the um what the great Insight was  from puce when he was writing around 1913 well I   have this problem like whenever I read fiction I'm  looking for little anecdotes of of what I can take   from that fiction and apply it to the world of  investing I should stop I should stop doing that   but and just enjoy the fiction but in this case  uh PR uh who was the Monumental French author who   wrote In Search of Lost time uh as you said uh he  he wrote I believe it was in you you'll know more  (49:43) better than I know the the fourth or the  fifth book within In Search of Lost time he said   the real Voyage of Discovery is not in seeking  new Landscapes but in having new eyes that is so   was when I read that I said wow this is this  is this is Marshall PR speaking about um asset   light growth businesses that are reinvesting now  penalizing their earning power now uh to create   a higher intrinsic value later and Adam Cecil by  the way gets it Adam Cecil totally gets that and   um the thing to remember like with asset like grow (50:27) companies especially software companies   the investment is often hitting the  income statement fully so by that I   mean that there's no capitalization of the  expense so if you have a let's say if you're   talking about a a drug company pharmaceutical  company the the R&D is is is is is is flowing   through the income statement and hitting the  income statement uh when you have a software   company the same thing is happening but if you  have let's say a steel company or a very asset   heavy company you're capitalizing that expense (51:07) over seven 10 even 15 years right and so   um the the the consequence is like the multiple  is going to be lower because just you're going   to have a higher earnings power today if you're  penalizing all of your your income statement now   your earnings are going to be lower and your  mul is going to be higher so that's often why   uh rapidly growing asset light in particular  growth companies uh have a higher multiple than   other companies do and it's super important to  understand that like and and that's that was proce  (51:41) to me just understanding that you  have to think about valuation with with new   new eyes to align with the kind of world that  we're living in a world that has moved away   from Acid heavy to acid light hey guys it's  Kay Fink here host of we study billionaires   today I wanted to tell you about our show sponsor  Vasa the dream of owning a vacation home can be   daunting from finding the best guests to the  maintenance to organizing the cleaners after   every guest day with vassa they make that dream  into a reality as a full service vacation home  (52:21) management company with vacation homes  and key destinations across the US they know how   to make owning a vacation home easy and  profitable on top of proactive Property   Maintenance visits by professional local teams a  datadriven booking platform and around the clock   support homeowners earn on average 20% more  revenue from their vacation homes Vasa makes   vacation home ownership easy if you're looking to  make more from your vacation homes by doing less   partner with vacasa vacasa.com that's vacasa. (52:57) com in a way it reminds me of what Bill   Miller said to me back in 2000 and 2001 when he  was getting pillared for buying 15% of Amazon and   Bill was hugely influenced by philosophers like  William James and Vicken Stein and that was one   of the reasons why he could be so agnostic  about these things because he could say Let   Let me let me look at Amazon with new eyes let  me look at it without bias and say well what   really is this is it a money losing company  that's doomed to fail and it's the embodiment   of the excesses of the do era or is it (53:31) something that actually has this   unbelievable CEO who's very longterm and is um  deferring the rewards because he's incredibly   patient and it has a cost advantage that's  going to become apparent down the road and   so because Bill is such a free thinker and  had a different set of sources that he was   drawing on philosophical sources that enabled  him to see things more agnostically without   bias he was able to understand Amazon and so  it it seems to me and and I mean he he told   me last year or so that basically he's the (54:09) he's the biggest single individual   shareholder of Amazon who isn't called Bezos  um this before Jeff bezos's ex-wife changed   her name from Bezos because she's obviously  a huge shareholder but so I think this gets   at a really important issue which  is which I think PR is getting at uh   and Vicken Stein and William James got out in  the field of philosophy which is that you have   to try to actually Define like what is it that I'm  looking at like and and if I look without bias and   with fresh eyes um will I see something that the (54:42) crowd isn't seeing but it's complicated   here in some ways because as you've pointed  out in some of your writings we're in this   age of incredibly rapid technological change and  we've never really seen this happen and so it's   very hard to see Tesla and be like well what  really is this because as you point out it's   is it a car company or is it a uh you know  what are the other fields that that Tesla   can actually revolutionize so uh so I gave  you the first kind of like lens at which I'm  (55:11) looking at Tesla as competing um as  an EV company against ice vehicles and EV as   a whole being much more efficient than than ice  but the other lenss I should share is that um I   don't think you can understand this company if  you don't understand assuming that assuming that   I'm right right it could be totally wrong but  uh as assuming that I'm right I don't believe   you can understand the company if you don't  understand that um to me it's an advanced   electronics manufacturer and software company (55:51) competing against a traditional   automobile manufacturing company and so why  is this important and and and and there's a   reason why I believe that and I can and I can  talk about that but why is this important this   is super important it's an electronic software  company competing against traditional Auto it's   super important to understand that because  there's certain things that kind of like   come into play there's there was a um aeronautical  engineer by the name of Theodore um Theodor Wright  (56:23) and Theodore Wright devised this concept  called rights law which states that for every   doubling of cumulative production that costs Fall  by a constant percentage and when you understand   that Tesla is an electronic software company you  understand like where is this company along this   rights law curve Tesla is so much further along  the curve than any of the ice vehicles that are   constrained because they're not electronic  in software companies they're traditional   auto companies um and it's Tesla's  so much further along the curve  (57:06) with respect to other EV companies and so  as ice Vehicles traditional Auto catches up Tesla   just moves much further along the curve and so the  the the spread between the competitive advantage   of Tesla the other EV companies and traditional  Auto is actually widening it's not getting more   narrow it's widening because of its massive scale  which allows it to push itself out along the the   cost curve further than anybody else and so one of  the major competitive advantages that the company   has is that it's a lowcost producer like that is a (57:46) very important to understand and the   street sees that the street sees that  they spend a$7 billion for a factory   a factory can produce a million vehicles and the  gross profit per vehicle right now is about 7200   which means that they put up a factory for 7  billion and they're making their investment   back in a year nobody else can do that Ford  is losing 36,000 or so uh on each EV so while   Tesla is making uh 7200 or so gross profit  per vehicle I'm not a fan of like looking   at unit economics in terms of CAC and and (58:35) and long-term value and and and blah   blah blah but I am a huge fan of thinking  about what are the unit economics of like   the what they're selling you know if you're  selling a a soda can how much is Coke making   per can right if you have a McDonald's how much  is it making per restaurant if you have a uh if   you're thinking about Tesla well how much is it  making for each Factory which really is its core   product is the factories you know how much  are they making per Factory that they they   put up and what's that worth you know what's (59:09) what's the present value of that so   I think it's super important to understand  that this you know when you when you think   about Tesla's an electronic and software company  different things come into play like like rights   law and second law of thermal dynamics is also  super important to understanding this company   so you've said that the there are a lot of there  are a lot of things going for the company right   I mean they um they're in the early stages of  this massive migration towards electric vehicles  (59:40) they're very formidable in power  storage and Generation Um there are all   these other kind of unique optional that you've  talked about like you've you've said that it may   be that they can eventually license their  technology for self-driving Vehicles full   s driving Vehicles so there's a lot of there's  a lot of tremendous upside so let's say we buy   that but then at the same time the market is  telling us that there's something deeply wrong   right there was an article in the New York Times (1:00:07) yesterday that was headlined Tesla's   troubles raised questions about its invincibility  there's this tendency obviously as the momentum   in terms of perception of Tesla has changed  there's all this criticism sales growth is   the sales growth rates are slowing the there  are all these Brands like BMW and byd that are   flooding Market with electric cars musk is  obviously an incredibly divisive figure and   people always say he's too thin stretched and  unfocused and uh I guess his his pay package   for over $50 billion got struck down by a (1:00:40) judge recently and the New York   Times is complaining there have been no  new models of the car since 2020 what   do you make of all this is this  just an opportunity to buy more   at a reasonable price or is there  something that's gone wrong here   well first of all we we actually did buy more uh  around current prices and um it these arguments   most of them at least except for the 50 billion  compensation package most of these arguments sound   like the same arguments you could go back and read  since the company went public they're probably  (1:01:21) probably less negative articles  today than there were around 2011 2012 13   but they seem very very similar and yet the stock  continues to go higher up 15,000 or so percent   since its IPO and what is um what's the case with  pretty much every Growth Company from Amazon to   Microsoft to any any great Growth Company there  are always periods when the stock is not going up   right there have been so many massive draw  Downs in Tesla since its IPO like there's   about to be couple dozen at least 40% draw  Downs since it's IPO for at least 30% draw  (1:02:15) downs and that's just part of investing  in growth companies no no businesses and I and   I wrote I wrote a paper called power and  challenges of of compounding which is on   our website but growth companies just don't go  in in straight lines they they move more like   in a in a step formation and if you look at the  kind of longer term um chart of Tesla Tesla's   just kind of in a step formation just like Amazon  was and Microsoft was let's let's talk a bit more   about that paper on the power and challenges (1:02:53) of compounding you you mentioned   um the statistic in there that you you talked  about before that over 66 years $1 invested in the   S&P 500 in 1957 would have grown 630 times and so  then you raised this very important question where   you said why then are there not more millionaires  or even billionaires and you said the answer I   believe is because the vast majority of investors  interrupt the compounding process unnecessarily   and you quote Charlie manga saying nervous money  never wins can you talk about the importance of  (1:03:24) simply not interrupting the compounding  process because it seems very Central to to your   philosophy in of investing whether it's in Tesa  or anything else well I can tell you that uh I've   made so many mistakes mean I've been investing  since I was 11 years old and um I use the term   investing Loosely you know when I was 11 years  old I I invested like $100 and but when I was in   my late 18s I actually had a fairly sizable chunk  of uh United Healthcare for whatever reason I was   spent a lot of time on um managed care companies (1:04:07) publicly traded managed care companies   and I put quite a bit of money uh for me at the  time in United Healthcare and uh they had this   they had a massive selloff like shortly thereafter  and I panicked and I sold everything and that   stock must be up hundreds of times I decided not  to look because I had too painful but that stock   must be up hundreds of times since I sold that  um I've sold many other companies over my you   know over the years the three decades plus that  I've been involved in in equities I've sold many  (1:04:45) companies prematurely and what I  came to realize that that's the real cost um   Peter pet Peter Keefe who I had this wonderful  conversation with recently at at lant's work   calls it the silent killer right selling great  compounding machines too early so I've made that   mistake many many many times in my life and I've  come to the point where uh I realize like that's   that's a huge huge huge cost so you don't want to  interrupt the compounding process unnecessarily   but that's easier said than done so like how (1:05:18) do you do that and I have my own   system for for doing that and it's an evolving  system uh but that's not easy and you're talking   about all of the negative press regarding Tesla  but there's plenty of negative press regarding   other Holdings and the longer you hold something  the more you're going to come across negative   articles uh you're going to come across friends  who will try to influence you and but at the   same time you have to be totally open-minded  right you don't want to get um just in this  (1:05:54) commitment consistency uh by you don't  you don't want to have commitment consistency yet   you you you also don't want to interrupt the  compounding process unnecessarily just not   easy right and as Charlie said why should it be  easy you you asked a an important question to   Peter Keefe who's a I I would really encourage  our listeners to learn more about P Peter was   a guest on this podcast and it's it's just  an amazing long-term investor incredible   investor and very thoughtful person I I'll (1:06:20) include our interview in the   in the show notes but when Christopher was  interviewing him I was listening I was list   to a recording of the interview last night  from the ltis work conference and you said   to him how do you resist the temptation to sell  compounding machines and to what degree are you   comfortable letting market value exceed your  estimate of intrinsic value and I wonder if   you could answer that yourself because that seems  to me an immensely difficult challenging question   what to do when these companies that you (1:06:51) love that a great business is   become really pricey and how do you think  of that because I've seen you in the past   in your letters to shareholders blaming  yourself for selling TR panion before it   quadrupled again um I've seen you kind of  holding on to some of these great growth   stocks that people complain about and then at  the same time you know you could say that in a   way you're guilty of the same thing that your  dad was guilty of of buying these very high   price stocks that were beloved and and having (1:07:22) a concentrated portfolio although   you stay wedded to them for much longer how  do you unpack that for us yeah so I think   investing is a super super personal journey  and you have to figure out the style that   meshes or lines with your own personality and  your own approach to investing the way I have   minimize the chance of selling great compounding  machines too early is to have a fair number of   positions so yeah I'm I'm I'm very concentrated  with respect to how most people would think   about the portfolio but I'm also pretty (1:08:14) Diversified with respect to some   other managers so we have about 21 Holdings today  I have found that having more Holdings it allows   me to be able to hold on to businesses that  might be experiencing difficult times or might   be in periods of overvaluation if I had all of my  money in let's say you go the opposite direction   all of my money in one stock it's

2024-05-31 07:16

Show Video

Other news